[1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool - page 465.

phillipsjk

legendary

Activity: 1008

Merit: 1001

Let the chips fall where they may.

Quote from: SpAcEDeViL on November 20, 2013, 05:23:50 PM

i have build it in my node last week... i mine with 14 GBs, 45x 333 Mhz

*twitch*
GBs == Gigabytes per second?
Mhz == Millions of cycles per second.

While there is no SI unit for "hashes" as far as I know, 14Ghash/s and 333Mhash/s would be more correct IMO.

zvs

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1000

https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com

Quote from: wlz2011 on November 20, 2013, 03:42:13 AM

Quote from: zvs on November 16, 2013, 11:30:10 PM

OK, so I'm guessing people probably use 204.10.105.113:9332/static because of the domain p2pool.org... even though it's horribly set up & has a 2% fee. quite sad really, when one looks at the one month/one year chart. (oh and ofc he never took me up on my offer, no mails from that guy)

now, second question, why do people use elizium.name?... or is it just all local traffic? though I'd be shocked if 95% or more of it wasn't just from random people using a remote p2pool. 400 shares I think is enough to get a trend & 55 orphans is bad. I can see there's 11 outgoing connections, but I guess I'll assume that those are just random outgoing connections? It looks like my node @ 198.12.127.2 used one of its random outgoing connections to hook up w/ it, but not connected to me at the other two places. normally i'd add it to --p2pool-node since it seems to be on a fast enough computer & good connection, but i've just been observing the sub 100% efficiency for the last few days & curiosity killed the cat. Is it all just because of that interface? The most important part is busted (the share explorer).

I also don't understand why so many people use 183.136.216.39:9332/static/graphs.html?Year when it's absolutely horrid. 10 outgoing connections, that are either totally random or not good choices. For location (China), he's not connecting to some critical western US & Russian nodes that he should be on. I *think* it's also on an old version of bitcoind. at least it's at 0% fee

But why would you use that over this: mine.yuyi.tw:9332 a far superior pool in Taiwan with 1/10th the hashrate. This one runs 0% fee too, so that's not it

is there some place i'm missing where these sites are being advertised? reddit? asic hardware manufacturer forums? lol.

some people want to use p2pool for whatever reason, but don't want to spend money on hosting for their own node (I'll assume they live in a crap rural area like myself w/ shit for bandwidth). but why always choose the wrong pools? then you get all the bullshit misinformation about how p2pool pays out less than . yeah, probably cause you were on one of these low efficiency pools or running a local node that was getting 15% orphans and 5% DOA.. though if it weren't for those people, I guess the rest wouldn't be picking up the bonus

but, seriously, who is mining on one of those 3 pools right now and why? is there anyone that reads this thread that does? if not, where are they coming from?

你懂中文吗？我不懂英文，183.136.216.39：9332是我建立的，但是我不懂编程这些技术，这是个普通的P2POOL节点矿池。我不知道如何去固定节点，或者应该怎么固定你说的美国俄罗斯节点。我只是和朋友在一起挖矿，可能是最差的池，来自一个完全不懂电脑程序的人，服务器是朋友提供的，没有打算收取任何费用。很高兴能引起你的关注，同时我也希望能得到技术上的帮助。如果你懂中文，是否可以用中文来帮助我解决这些问题，谢谢。钱包是的0.85版本。

I had to use google translate. Grin

I'd say talk to this guy: mine.yuyi.tw:9332

https://twitter.com/TaiwanPool (for one, you'd want him to --p2pool-node to your pool, since he has 0 incoming)

I've been saying for a while it's by far the best server in Oceania area.... it looks like he picked up a lot of hashing power recently and is still doing well on orphans

jedimstr

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Quote from: SpAcEDeViL on November 20, 2013, 05:23:50 PM

Quote from: maqifrnswa on November 20, 2013, 04:54:56 PM

Quote from: SpAcEDeViL on November 20, 2013, 02:42:07 PM

Quote from: HellDiverUK on November 20, 2013, 02:24:52 PM

Quote from: SpAcEDeViL on November 20, 2013, 01:33:41 PM

Is zvs the developer of the p2pool?

forrestv is.

Ah, thx.

Did anybody know, how can i setup p2pool to generate p2pool-share from all miners globally?
And pay them out over there shares on my node?

I know its not "hop-proof" but i have many small miners with usb sticks, and the p2pool-diff is too high for a single share from a miner.
So i mean many miners works on a node-share to p2pool network and become payouts based on miner shares to the node.

Or must i use eloipool ?

there is no built in functionality for that. You could set fee to 100% and then write your own script to parse http://yourserver.com:9332/web/log to find out what everyone's hashing power was per day and payout each daily based on that.

That is a good idea, but maybe outside of the scope of p2pool. A key property of p2pool is the trustless payout scheme. If you start centralizing payouts, then people start depending on a third party for payment.

A better way would be to lower the hashrate cap so large hashers don't flood the sharechain and push out small hashers. I think forrestv has done it, it's now:
https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool/commit/69d7300919e0f9b23ec81c1d01c0bf12cdb1ebc5
basically you get a max of 48 large-value shares per day so smaller miners can scrap up a few smaller value shares. At best it should lower difficulty for a share by 3 - might not be enough for usb sticks though.

Hy,

i have build it in my node last week... i mine with 14 GBs, 45x 333 Mhz
I mine over 5 days and no p2pool-share was generated. Unlucky? I dont think so.
I think, the USB Miner can not generate a share over 200K or over 100K in 10 sec or 20 sec. And when, This is luck.
But so i can mine over weeks, month and become no shares, and when, so become only < 0.002 BTC...
But when i mine on a pool i become 0.01 per day, actually...

When forrestv add a modification in p2pool, i think a many small miners discover p2pool.
And when forrestv add a option for the miners, e.g. *address*/p0.02 for mining in node-share mode and payout 0.02 from node wallet-address. when it reached.

OR you write it, lower p2pool Diff. But this increase "dust"...

Hmm that doesn't sound right. I have similar hash power (15Ghs) also using 45x Block Erupters and I have plenty of shares. As of this writing 14 accepted and 1 orphan for the same 7 days of runtime. Check it out here: http://galactica.geekgalaxy.com:9332/static/

I just checked out your pool at http://smileandgo.de:9332/static/ and it looks like your 45 block Erupters aren't registering any hashrate at all on your pool node. Are you sure you have your mining software pointing at your node correctly? All I see is a few spikes here and there, but usually just 0 hashrate, so of course you won't get any shares.

zvs

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1000

https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com

Quote from: jedimstr on November 20, 2013, 12:03:13 AM

Wait, you got tired of people potentially donating to you (may not have been a mistake) and that's why you left P2Pool? What if they were legitimately paying you a tip/donation with hash cycles?

If they wanted to donate, they could have just mined under a real mining address... it did have a 1% fee set

this is the monthly chart (missing the last two days since i've taken it down)

www.nogleg.com/temp/monthly_graph.html

and the weekly:

www.nogleg.com/temp/weekly_graph.html

i don't see that many workers on any other public nodes... that come in for a couple seconds then leave (even discounting 50% or more of the addresses being invalid)

my guess is my server is some fallback on some mining software somewhere? either way, all those diff ppl ate up sockets that never closed. i think it impacted 'real' miners when i set the max to 3 sockets per user

SpAcEDeViL

legendary

Activity: 986

Merit: 1027

Miner-Control.de Pooler

Quote from: maqifrnswa on November 20, 2013, 04:54:56 PM

Quote from: SpAcEDeViL on November 20, 2013, 02:42:07 PM

Quote from: HellDiverUK on November 20, 2013, 02:24:52 PM

Quote from: SpAcEDeViL on November 20, 2013, 01:33:41 PM

Is zvs the developer of the p2pool?

forrestv is.

Ah, thx.

Did anybody know, how can i setup p2pool to generate p2pool-share from all miners globally?
And pay them out over there shares on my node?

I know its not "hop-proof" but i have many small miners with usb sticks, and the p2pool-diff is too high for a single share from a miner.
So i mean many miners works on a node-share to p2pool network and become payouts based on miner shares to the node.

Or must i use eloipool ?

there is no built in functionality for that. You could set fee to 100% and then write your own script to parse http://yourserver.com:9332/web/log to find out what everyone's hashing power was per day and payout each daily based on that.

That is a good idea, but maybe outside of the scope of p2pool. A key property of p2pool is the trustless payout scheme. If you start centralizing payouts, then people start depending on a third party for payment.

A better way would be to lower the hashrate cap so large hashers don't flood the sharechain and push out small hashers. I think forrestv has done it, it's now:
https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool/commit/69d7300919e0f9b23ec81c1d01c0bf12cdb1ebc5
basically you get a max of 48 large-value shares per day so smaller miners can scrap up a few smaller value shares. At best it should lower difficulty for a share by 3 - might not be enough for usb sticks though.

Hy,

i have build it in my node last week... i mine with 14 GBs, 45x 333 Mhz
I mine over 5 days and no p2pool-share was generated. Unlucky? I dont think so.
I think, the USB Miner can not generate a share over 200K or over 100K in 10 sec or 20 sec. And when, This is luck.
But so i can mine over weeks, month and become no shares, and when, so become only < 0.002 BTC...
But when i mine on a pool i become 0.01 per day, actually...

When forrestv add a modification in p2pool, i think a many small miners discover p2pool.
And when forrestv add a option for the miners, e.g. *address*/p0.02 for mining in node-share mode and payout 0.02 from node wallet-address. when it reached.

OR you write it, lower p2pool Diff. But this increase "dust"...

maqifrnswa

sr. member

Activity: 454

Merit: 252

Quote from: SpAcEDeViL on November 20, 2013, 02:42:07 PM

Quote from: HellDiverUK on November 20, 2013, 02:24:52 PM

Quote from: SpAcEDeViL on November 20, 2013, 01:33:41 PM

Is zvs the developer of the p2pool?

forrestv is.

Ah, thx.

Did anybody know, how can i setup p2pool to generate p2pool-share from all miners globally?
And pay them out over there shares on my node?

I know its not "hop-proof" but i have many small miners with usb sticks, and the p2pool-diff is too high for a single share from a miner.
So i mean many miners works on a node-share to p2pool network and become payouts based on miner shares to the node.

Or must i use eloipool ?

there is no built in functionality for that. You could set fee to 100% and then write your own script to parse http://yourserver.com:9332/web/log to find out what everyone's hashing power was per day and payout each daily based on that.

That is a good idea, but maybe outside of the scope of p2pool. A key property of p2pool is the trustless payout scheme. If you start centralizing payouts, then people start depending on a third party for payment.

A better way would be to lower the hashrate cap so large hashers don't flood the sharechain and push out small hashers. I think forrestv has done it, it's now:
https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool/commit/69d7300919e0f9b23ec81c1d01c0bf12cdb1ebc5
basically you get a max of 48 large-value shares per day so smaller miners can scrap up a few smaller value shares. At best it should lower difficulty for a share by 3 - might not be enough for usb sticks though.

SpAcEDeViL

legendary

Activity: 986

Merit: 1027

Miner-Control.de Pooler

Quote from: HellDiverUK on November 20, 2013, 02:24:52 PM

Quote from: SpAcEDeViL on November 20, 2013, 01:33:41 PM

Is zvs the developer of the p2pool?

forrestv is.

Ah, thx.

Did anybody know, how can i setup p2pool to generate p2pool-share from all miners globally?
And pay them out over there shares on my node?

I know its not "hop-proof" but i have many small miners with usb sticks, and the p2pool-diff is too high for a single share from a miner.
So i mean many miners works on a node-share to p2pool network and become payouts based on miner shares to the node.

Or must i use eloipool ?

HellDiverUK

hero member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 501

Quote from: SpAcEDeViL on November 20, 2013, 01:33:41 PM

Is zvs the developer of the p2pool?

forrestv is.

SpAcEDeViL

legendary

Activity: 986

Merit: 1027

Miner-Control.de Pooler

Is zvs the developer of the p2pool?

wlz2011

member

Activity: 71

Merit: 10

Quote from: zvs on November 16, 2013, 11:30:10 PM

OK, so I'm guessing people probably use 204.10.105.113:9332/static because of the domain p2pool.org... even though it's horribly set up & has a 2% fee. quite sad really, when one looks at the one month/one year chart. (oh and ofc he never took me up on my offer, no mails from that guy)

now, second question, why do people use elizium.name?... or is it just all local traffic? though I'd be shocked if 95% or more of it wasn't just from random people using a remote p2pool. 400 shares I think is enough to get a trend & 55 orphans is bad. I can see there's 11 outgoing connections, but I guess I'll assume that those are just random outgoing connections? It looks like my node @ 198.12.127.2 used one of its random outgoing connections to hook up w/ it, but not connected to me at the other two places. normally i'd add it to --p2pool-node since it seems to be on a fast enough computer & good connection, but i've just been observing the sub 100% efficiency for the last few days & curiosity killed the cat. Is it all just because of that interface? The most important part is busted (the share explorer).

I also don't understand why so many people use 183.136.216.39:9332/static/graphs.html?Year when it's absolutely horrid. 10 outgoing connections, that are either totally random or not good choices. For location (China), he's not connecting to some critical western US & Russian nodes that he should be on. I *think* it's also on an old version of bitcoind. at least it's at 0% fee

But why would you use that over this: mine.yuyi.tw:9332 a far superior pool in Taiwan with 1/10th the hashrate. This one runs 0% fee too, so that's not it

is there some place i'm missing where these sites are being advertised? reddit? asic hardware manufacturer forums? lol.

some people want to use p2pool for whatever reason, but don't want to spend money on hosting for their own node (I'll assume they live in a crap rural area like myself w/ shit for bandwidth). but why always choose the wrong pools? then you get all the bullshit misinformation about how p2pool pays out less than . yeah, probably cause you were on one of these low efficiency pools or running a local node that was getting 15% orphans and 5% DOA.. though if it weren't for those people, I guess the rest wouldn't be picking up the bonus

but, seriously, who is mining on one of those 3 pools right now and why? is there anyone that reads this thread that does? if not, where are they coming from?

你懂中文吗？我不懂英文，183.136.216.39：9332是我建立的，但是我不懂编程这些技术，这是个普通的P2POOL节点矿池。我不知道如何去固定节点，或者应该怎么固定你说的美国俄罗斯节点。我只是和朋友在一起挖矿，可能是最差的池，来自一个完全不懂电脑程序的人，服务器是朋友提供的，没有打算收取任何费用。很高兴能引起你的关注，同时我也希望能得到技术上的帮助。如果你懂中文，是否可以用中文来帮助我解决这些问题，谢谢。钱包是的0.85版本。

jedimstr

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Wait, you got tired of people potentially donating to you (may not have been a mistake) and that's why you left P2Pool? What if they were legitimately paying you a tip/donation with hash cycles?

zvs

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1000

https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com

Quote from: agibby5 on November 19, 2013, 11:45:20 AM

Quote from: zvs on November 19, 2013, 11:14:12 AM

the guy running p2pool.org is oblivious. p2pool.org:9332/static/graphs.html?Day ... upgrade ... bitcoind ... version ...

Except to the fact that he was able to secure p2pool.org.

What, did something happen to it earlier? I'm confused..

Quote

funny, I came back to report that failover-only was working on zvs's pools, when he took them down this time they didn't lock up the miners.

Yeah, mostly just got tired of all the ppl coming without even using their bitcoin address, even though they generated me a couple of taco bell meals over the last couple of weeks.

When I look at p2pool.org's daily log, there's not a single person listed that didn't use a proper bitcoin address (well, a few litecoin addresses).... but his getblocktemplate latency chart is lol Grin

maqifrnswa

sr. member

Activity: 454

Merit: 252

funny, I came back to report that failover-only was working on zvs's pools, when he took them down this time they didn't lock up the miners.

agibby5

sr. member

Activity: 267

Merit: 250

Quote from: zvs on November 19, 2013, 11:14:12 AM

the guy running p2pool.org is oblivious. p2pool.org:9332/static/graphs.html?Day ... upgrade ... bitcoind ... version ...

Except to the fact that he was able to secure p2pool.org.

zvs

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1000

https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com

Quote from: jedimstr on November 19, 2013, 04:14:44 AM

Zvs: I guess this means we should remove your 3 servers from our Bitcoin addnode and p2pool -n lists?

Yah.

Quote

It's almost as if it was never meant to have that many connections. Oh wait...

Sure seems that way. I imagine it's why p2pool.org runs so horribly.

Doesn't mean that it's a problem that should be ignored.

Quote

Cool, should mean less wall-of-text meaningless ramblings on this thread, too.

Even the poster above you caught the drift, but you just seem to be oblivious

on second thought, you're not oblivious, just a jackass. the guy running p2pool.org is oblivious. p2pool.org:9332/static/graphs.html?Day ... upgrade ... bitcoind ... version ...

HellDiverUK

hero member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 501

Cool, should mean less wall-of-text meaningless ramblings on this thread, too. Roll Eyes

Krak

hero member

Activity: 591

Merit: 500

Quote from: zvs on November 18, 2013, 06:10:01 PM

ed: haha, ok, this time I'm seriously done w/ p2pool. too buggy & f*cked up. bogs system down hardcore when 100 people connect to you for 2 seconds. fails to close closets. could be a python problem. plus no response from developer... oh, yeah, gg having like 400 sockets clear after closing p2pool process

It's almost as if it was never meant to have that many connections. Oh wait...

jedimstr

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Zvs: I guess this means we should remove your 3 servers from our Bitcoin addnode and p2pool -n lists?

zvs

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1000

https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com

Well, I just restarted everything w/ the latest git of p2pool.

28 shares, 1 orphan, 5 DOA amongst all four

All 5 DOA came from one reporting a 12% DOA & the historical DOA would make around 2-2.5 or so normal. I did notice that all 5 DOA came from the same worker, while the other workers had 0 (the worker with 5 DOA shares had 8 or 9 total.... just extremely unlucky, or it's underreporting some DOA % or what?). I did notice the web values don't always coincide with the values you see in your log

Anyway, nothing changed other than the index.html & number of outgoing and incoming connections on this new git. Not sure if it still did/does the stratum connection interrupts or not?

btw: I'm assuming this increasing latency from everyone is because of all the free priority transactions that p2pool stores?

Code:

2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:38 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:40 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:40 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:40 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:40 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:40 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:40 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:40 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:40 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:40 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:40 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:40 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:40 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:40 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:40 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2013-11-18 23:59:40 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool : free transaction rejected by rate limiter

i'm assuming it stores them all somewhere, else i'd get a lot more of the

log:2013-11-18 17:46:18.884577 invalid hash for xxx 'remember_tx' 248810 54ae5455
log:2013-11-18 17:46:53.459911 invalid hash for xxx 'remember_tx' 248925 9d3b9599
log:2013-11-18 17:47:30.062552 invalid hash for xxx 'remember_tx' 248888 b5e1de16
log:2013-11-18 17:47:41.372764 invalid hash for xxx 'remember_tx' 248888 b5e1de16
log:2013-11-18 17:47:45.965405 invalid hash for xxx 'remember_tx' 248823 b174ddb7
log:2013-11-18 17:47:50.254166 invalid hash for xxx 'remember_tx' 248823 b174ddb7
log:2013-11-18 17:48:17.342628 invalid hash for xxx 'remember_tx' 248929 b771bc0a
log:2013-11-18 17:48:23.296767 invalid hash for xxx 'remember_tx' 248778 05d4da52
log:2013-11-18 17:48:28.075889 invalid hash for xxx 'remember_tx' 248778 05d4da52

ed: haha, ok, this time I'm seriously done w/ p2pool. too buggy & f*cked up. bogs system down hardcore when 100 people connect to you for 2 seconds. fails to close closets. could be a python problem. plus no response from developer... oh, yeah, gg having like 400 sockets clear after closing p2pool process

zvs

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1000

https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com

Quote from: semaster on November 17, 2013, 01:07:03 PM

zvs, thanks that you care so much about p2pool
if you have some suggestions about efficiency of http://elizium.name write me please.
this node based on an excellent server with a lot of memory, bandwidth, good pings, 99.9% uptime so there is a lot of reasons to use it any ways

yeah, i've noticed it's on a really good system (next time i restart it, you're in my p2pool-node list so that should help some anyway)

i'm having issues w/ my own right now, at least some of it is probably connected to dropping efficiency rate w/ higher hash rate?

but finally someone w/ decent hash rate sat on here for a bit, now i'm getting occasional stratum interrupts on my video card. it resyncs fine, but some other ppl report that it essentially destroys the connection and never fixes itself?

i'm trying it now with an expiry time of 60 seconds instead of 120 seconds, then stratum should never time out?

i know machine isn't overloaded or anything, so not really sure what the deal is with that/.. but whoever that was is gone now, so i'll have to test some more later i guess, haha

i see the getblocktemplate latency went up a lot.. i guess i should put p2pool in tmpfs also, that's strange. i do still have memory leak issues with bitcoind, it was up to 6GB memory, so i reset that

i'm also getting those random miners again w/o having a bitcoin address set. this time fr333n3rgy, which looks like another minecraft player, same with ccg121. capitall is too generic a name, tomparis2000, well, i don't know what's up w/ those google results. just a lot of ppl that come over for a minute or two w/o bitcoin addresses.

is there someone running a modified pool somewhere where people have user accounts & they have other p2pools as backups?

do you get a lot of ppl w/o a bitcoin address as username as well? it's also still having the issue of leaving 9332 sockets open, i have about 200 so far now

Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool - page 465. (Read 2592017 times)