Author

Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool - page 808. (Read 2591971 times)

legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
I was hashing for literally my first 2 minutes on p2ppool and this happens:



Also thus far I have 0 accepted 2 rejected in roughly 6 minutes.

1) What caused the error?
2) Is this rate normal?
3) Is mining with 200-241 MHz too inefficient with p2ppool?
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1000
Where can I find these graphs?  The ones I found (at http://mymachine:9332/graphs/) don't show individual workers.

on p2pool startup it prints a vip password.
use this as a miner password and /graphs will display per-worker-stats.

EDIT: as all graphs use rrd its easy to make seperated graphs per worker (even with commandline only)
hero member
Activity: 737
Merit: 500
I'm personally really happy about the new built in per-worker graphs:


Where can I find these graphs?  The ones I found (at http://mymachine:9332/graphs/) don't show individual workers.
eja
newbie
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
It's the same rate that the p2pool daemon displays in the logging.
The rate is derived from the number of valid p2pool shares generated for that address in the last two hours and should update more or less immediately as shares are found.
The figure is not always accurate though, for example mine now says 0MH, but that is just because my miner did not find any shares in the past hours.
And if you're on a lucky streak it may indicate too high.
legendary
Activity: 2126
Merit: 1001
Does anyone have a clever way to monitor several miners?

I've created a p2pool rate icon/badge generator.
http://p2pool.us.to/p2pool_rate.php?address=

That is nice!
So I could give every miner its own payout address, and make me a html page with all icons..
With one look I would see the hashing speed of every miner. Works fromanywhere too, not just in my lan.
What do you think is the updating rate of the icons? After every found block? After every found proof-of-work? Or faster than that?

Ente
legendary
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
BitMinter
Hello, no problems with cgminer. That was the ztex miner for my fpga boards. Looks like the software needs an update to work with p2pool.
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1008
^ What cgminer version are you using? I experienced that error ("Worker submitted share with hash greater than target") when using an older version of cgminer. Try upgrading to the newest cgminer if you're using an older version.
legendary
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
BitMinter
Can someone tell me if this is working ? I know that it works with cgminer but what about the ztex software ? Why does the client tell me "worker submitted share with hash xxx" and with cgminer it doesn't ? Thank you

Code:
2012-01-29 14:59:28.189000 Worker submitted share with hash > target:
2012-01-29 14:59:28.189000     Hash:   c3421332b80abfc17bf0d192d2e8ab522f86bfab9
e95459b59a4fbca
2012-01-29 14:59:28.190000     Target: 1ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
fffffffffffffff
2012-01-29 14:59:34.115000 Connection timed out, disconnecting from 24.167.17.24
8:9333
2012-01-29 14:59:34.116000 Lost peer 24.167.17.248:9333
2012-01-29 14:59:34.812000 Outgoing connection to peer 24.23.118.244:9333 establ
ished. p2pool version: 2 '0074a36'
2012-01-29 14:59:34.813000 Got share hash, requesting! Hash: 888cb6d0
2012-01-29 14:59:35.151000 New work for worker! Share difficulty: 274.676403 Pay
out if block: 0.005477 BTC Total block value: 50.024500 BTC including 72 transac
tions
2012-01-29 14:59:35.364000 Pool: 141GH/s in 13216 shares (4579/13220 verified) R
ecent: 0.00% >0H/s Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Peers: 10 (0 incoming)
2012-01-29 14:59:35.365000 Average time between blocks: 0.46 days
2012-01-29 14:59:35.365000 Pool stales: 9%
2012-01-29 14:59:40.141000 New work for worker! Share difficulty: 277.989760 Pay
out if block: 0.005543 BTC Total block value: 50.024500 BTC including 72 transac
tions
2012-01-29 14:59:41.375000 Pool: 141GH/s in 13217 shares (4580/13221 verified) R
ecent: 0.00% >0H/s Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Peers: 10 (0 incoming)
2012-01-29 14:59:41.375000 Average time between blocks: 0.46 days
2012-01-29 14:59:41.376000 Pool stales: 9%
2012-01-29 14:59:47.140000 New work for worker! Share difficulty: 290.218655 Pay
out if block: 0.005787 BTC Total block value: 50.024500 BTC including 72 transac
tions
2012-01-29 14:59:47.384000 Pool: 143GH/s in 13217 shares (4581/13222 verified) R
ecent: 0.00% >0H/s Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Peers: 10 (0 incoming)
2012-01-29 14:59:47.384000 Average time between blocks: 0.45 days
2012-01-29 14:59:47.385000 Pool stales: 9%
2012-01-29 15:00:00.250000 New work for worker! Share difficulty: 289.937785 Pay
out if block: 0.005782 BTC Total block value: 50.024500 BTC including 72 transac
tions
2012-01-29 15:00:02.405000 Pool: 141GH/s in 13218 shares (4582/13223 verified) R
ecent: 0.00% >0H/s Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Peers: 10 (0 incoming)
2012-01-29 15:00:02.405000 Average time between blocks: 0.46 days
2012-01-29 15:00:02.406000 Pool stales: 9%
2012-01-29 15:00:04.769000 New work for worker! Share difficulty: 307.602721 Pay
out if block: 0.006134 BTC Total block value: 50.024500 BTC including 72 transac
tions
2012-01-29 15:00:04.786000 Requesting parent share fdcef64e from 95.158.65.96:93
33
2012-01-29 15:00:05.411000 Pool: 143GH/s in 13219 shares (4583/13224 verified) R
ecent: 0.00% >0H/s Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Peers: 10 (0 incoming)
2012-01-29 15:00:05.412000 Average time between blocks: 0.45 days
2012-01-29 15:00:05.412000 Pool stales: 9%
2012-01-29 15:00:09.605000 Processing 1001 shares...
2012-01-29 15:00:09.822000
2012-01-29 15:00:09.823000 GOT BLOCK FROM PEER! Passing to bitcoind! a1965e15 bi
tcoin: 903d4b0c5393ab89e2ebb51d26cf57b82a7c651c1aea6f4cf9b
2012-01-29 15:00:09.823000
2012-01-29 15:00:20.414000 Requesting parent share aa600cd7 from 66.68.219.188:9
333
2012-01-29 15:00:20.416000 ... done processing 1001 shares. New: 1001 Have: 1422
5/~17280
2012-01-29 15:00:20.518000 Pool: 143GH/s in 14220 shares (5584/14225 verified) R
ecent: 0.00% >0H/s Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Peers: 10 (0 incoming)
2012-01-29 15:00:20.518000 Average time between blocks: 0.45 days
2012-01-29 15:00:20.519000 Pool stales: 9%
2012-01-29 15:00:20.540000 New work for worker! Share difficulty: 289.667461 Pay
out if block: 0.005778 BTC Total block value: 50.037500 BTC including 80 transac
tions
2012-01-29 15:00:20.612000 New work for worker! Share difficulty: 296.030914 Pay
out if block: 0.005905 BTC Total block value: 50.037500 BTC including 80 transac
tions
2012-01-29 15:00:22.151000 New work for worker! Share difficulty: 301.083235 Pay
out if block: 0.006006 BTC Total block value: 50.041000 BTC including 87 transac
tions
2012-01-29 15:00:23.524000 Pool: 142GH/s in 14224 shares (5587/14228 verified) R
ecent: 0.00% >0H/s Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Peers: 10 (0 incoming)
2012-01-29 15:00:23.525000 Average time between blocks: 0.46 days
2012-01-29 15:00:23.525000 Pool stales: 9%
2012-01-29 15:00:26.159000 New work for worker! Share difficulty: 303.776345 Pay
out if block: 0.006059 BTC Total block value: 50.041000 BTC including 87 transac
tions
2012-01-29 15:00:26.529000 Pool: 140GH/s in 14225 shares (5588/14229 verified) R
ecent: 0.00% >0H/s Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Peers: 10 (0 incoming)
2012-01-29 15:00:26.529000 Average time between blocks: 0.46 days
2012-01-29 15:00:26.530000 Pool stales: 9%
2012-01-29 15:00:33.140000 Worker submitted share with hash > target:
2012-01-29 15:00:33.141000     Hash:   e2a6a29e5971338e04cbf70aaa5ac7805fd1be188
91a780471a23352
2012-01-29 15:00:33.142000     Target: 1ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
fffffffffffffff
2012-01-29 15:00:39.159000 New work for worker! Share difficulty: 301.933951 Pay
out if block: 0.006023 BTC Total block value: 50.044500 BTC including 94 transac
tions
2012-01-29 15:00:39.187000 Requesting parent share aa600cd7 from 31.151.238.43:9
333
2012-01-29 15:00:41.556000 Pool: 140GH/s in 14225 shares (5589/14230 verified) R
ecent: 0.00% >0H/s Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Peers: 10 (0 incoming)
2012-01-29 15:00:41.557000 Average time between blocks: 0.46 days
2012-01-29 15:00:41.557000 Pool stales: 9%
2012-01-29 15:00:46.441000 New work for worker! Share difficulty: 302.756704 Pay
out if block: 0.006040 BTC Total block value: 50.044500 BTC including 94 transac
tions
2012-01-29 15:00:47.569000 Pool: 139GH/s in 14226 shares (5590/14231 verified) R
ecent: 0.00% >0H/s Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Peers: 10 (0 incoming)
2012-01-29 15:00:47.569000 Average time between blocks: 0.47 days
2012-01-29 15:00:47.570000 Pool stales: 9%
eja
newbie
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
Someone else made a nice looking avatar image (that you can put under your name in the left sidebar).  Scroll up for the details.
Doesn't seemt to work currently though:

http://p2pool.us.to/p2pool_rate.php?address=1L4fyJqCy5uLmoMo4cG74TaTvgtUwwSHJx

It seems my p2pool daemon crashed/dissappeared during the night and that caused the image generator to fail.. should be back up shortly.

full member
Activity: 373
Merit: 100
With current p2pool from git (= commit 210a3f432598536073c3268cd9b975941bb2c2d2), I just got the following excption when a block was found:


I assume it has something to do with me specifying the "--irc-announce" parameter.
legendary
Activity: 2126
Merit: 1001
Aah, I have a question fitting right in:
Does anyone have a clever way to monitor several miners?
One webpage with "Miner 2 is mining/offline" etc would be enough, bonuspoints for "Miner 2: 123mh/s".
In short, something as convenient as the centralized pools status windows, not needing to remotely login to every single mining rig.

Any ideas?

Ente
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1008
Someone else made a nice looking avatar image (that you can put under your name in the left sidebar).  Scroll up for the details.
Doesn't seemt to work currently though:

hero member
Activity: 737
Merit: 500
How to make this signature pic?

You can't.  I added it to btcstats.net for myself only as it gets its data on my hashrate from my personal proxy.  I suppose I could try to figure out how to find other people's hashrates from the p2pool RPC api if people wanted it, but I don't think you can put images in signatures anymore, so it would be kind of pointless except at other websites (it works for me here only because I haven't changed my sig since the new rule went into affect). 

Someone else made a nice looking avatar image (that you can put under your name in the left sidebar).  Scroll up for the details.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
I pointed my modest setup at p2pool.  It wasn't too painful.  We'll see how it goes.
How to make this signature pic?
hero member
Activity: 737
Merit: 500
I pointed my modest setup at p2pool.  It wasn't too painful.  We'll see how it goes.
legendary
Activity: 960
Merit: 1028
Spurn wild goose chases. Seek that which endures.
What decides share difficulty? I only have 300 mhash and 250 and 300 difficulty shares are kind of slow to mine.
From what I understand, it's automatically adjusted in the same way as any blockchain difficulty - just with the "network size" being the total hashpower on p2pool, and the target frequency being 10 seconds instead of 10 minutes.
full member
Activity: 193
Merit: 100
What decides share difficulty? I only have 300 mhash and 250 and 300 difficulty shares are kind of slow to mine.
full member
Activity: 215
Merit: 100
I was just able to configure P2pool. Starting next week, I will move all of my 500 MH/s to P2pool from deepbit. It is nice to have decentralized mining pool. I feel P2pool will be the future of bitcoin mining.
Why next week?

Oh! I have the P2pool working in my laptop, but my miners are at another location. I will go there next week to reconfigure.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
Having a GUI version, maybe merged with CGminer would really help
hero member
Activity: 516
Merit: 643
Its around six computers, with 12 miners (gpus) running. What would be the difference between running six local p2pool nodes and running one central p2pool "server"? As it takes quite long to do a proof-of-work-share, will my efficiency differ? Those miners run 24/7, so it should even out at the same efficiency eventually? I would love to have only one central p2pool node running, but my friend prefers more redundancy with independent computers..

I would just run one... You get combined worker statistics and have less work to do setting it up.

EDIT: I can confirm that Qoheleth's summary is completely correct. Smiley
Jump to: