1933 (111,114 BTC) moving - page 2. | Bitcointalksearch.org

ivroer

member

Activity: 89

Merit: 14

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on March 10, 2014, 12:36:02 AM

Quote

Now it just changed to the above, and Google has this thread index, whereupon it wasn't there a few minutes ago, as I have shown and everyone here would have experienced the same thing I did at the time.

Quote from: joesmoe2012 on March 10, 2014, 12:38:28 AM

Allegedly its prevent search engines indexing duplicate content, which is very bad for SEO.

Also from briefly reading a couple threads over @ the SMF forum on the issue, in this version of SMF, the search de-duplication doesn't work well.

I just noticed when I referenced a different thread from my watchlist (i.e. goto "new" posts) the noindex directive is given. This would support the theory that SMF sets it on "special" pages to avoid duplicate content for crawlers.

When I open the same thread directly from the main forum list, noindex is not in the source.

/end side-track.

Phinnaeus Gage

legendary

Activity: 1918

Merit: 1570

Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending

Got it!

Post #4 was indexed, but post #5 onward was when the robot/no-index was manually put in place.

The following thread was just created, but no robot/no-index meta tag is in place: mtgox is really hacked again?

lindatess

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

I'm excited, as it is someone probably getting ready to dump.

joesmoe2012

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 501

Ching-Chang;Ding-Dong

Allegedly its prevent search engines indexing duplicate content, which is very bad for SEO.

Also from briefly reading a couple threads over @ the SMF forum on the issue, in this version of SMF, the search de-duplication doesn't work well.

Phinnaeus Gage

legendary

Activity: 1918

Merit: 1570

Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending

Quote

Now it just changed to the above, and Google has this thread index, whereupon it wasn't there a few minutes ago, as I have shown and everyone here would have experienced the same thing I did at the time.

Boris-The-Blade

full member

Activity: 156

Merit: 100

Must be nice!

joesmoe2012

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 501

Ching-Chang;Ding-Dong

Quote

It's conditional case.

$context['robot_no_index'] is set on only pages that are duplicates of others, which is said to help indexing.

http://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php?topic=234844.0

So maybe after page 1 it puts that or something? That's what the SMF forum people are saying about it.

Phinnaeus Gage

legendary

Activity: 1918

Merit: 1570

Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending

Quote from: StarfishPrime on March 10, 2014, 12:20:08 AM

Quote from: StarfishPrime on March 10, 2014, 12:10:25 AM

The truth will probably be stranger than anything we can imagine right now. My guess is that the 311k coins that have been moving are still safely under trustee control.
...

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on March 10, 2014, 12:00:52 AM

Amazingly, this thread is not being indexed, ergo no Google crawl.

Quote

Perhaps I spoke too soon. Not quite so certain now. Good one...

I've noticed it before being in place with other quasi-controversial threads, but opted to not call it out, kinda hoping/guessing that it was an anomaly.

Only an admin would have such privileges, and would have to be available and know that such was warranted.

Phinnaeus Gage

legendary

Activity: 1918

Merit: 1570

Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending

Quote from: ivroer on March 10, 2014, 12:12:59 AM

Quote from: joesmoe2012 on March 10, 2014, 12:10:00 AM

Quote from: ivroer on March 10, 2014, 12:09:12 AM

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on March 10, 2014, 12:00:52 AM

Amazingly, this thread is not being indexed, ergo no Google crawl.

Quote

Well spotted sir, but what would you speculate the motivation is behind that?
Also, am I right to assume only mods and/or admin can set this meta tag on a thread?

I think its assigned on every thread isnt it?

Nah, most of the threads are indexed by search engines. Go have a look at the source of just about any other thread page, no robots meta tag...

In fact, Google indexes this forum instantly, unless instructed not to. I just went to a random thread, then copy and paste a phrase submitted minutes ago and searched for it via Google:

https://www.google.com/search?q=I+think+it+is+designed+as+decentralized&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS549US549&oq=I+think+it+is+designed+as+decentralized&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i64l3&sourceid=chrome&espv=210&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8#q=%22I+think+it+is+designed+as+decentralized%22

StarfishPrime

sr. member

Activity: 358

Merit: 250

Quote from: StarfishPrime on March 10, 2014, 12:10:25 AM

The truth will probably be stranger than anything we can imagine right now. My guess is that the 311k coins that have been moving are still safely under trustee control.
...

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on March 10, 2014, 12:00:52 AM

Amazingly, this thread is not being indexed, ergo no Google crawl.

Quote

Perhaps I spoke too soon. Not quite so certain now. Good one...

joesmoe2012

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 501

Ching-Chang;Ding-Dong

Quote from: ivroer on March 10, 2014, 12:12:59 AM

Quote from: joesmoe2012 on March 10, 2014, 12:10:00 AM

Quote from: ivroer on March 10, 2014, 12:09:12 AM

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on March 10, 2014, 12:00:52 AM

Amazingly, this thread is not being indexed, ergo no Google crawl.

Quote

Well spotted sir, but what would you speculate the motivation is behind that?
Also, am I right to assume only mods and/or admin can set this meta tag on a thread?

I think its assigned on every thread isnt it?

Nah, most of the threads are indexed by search engines. Go have a look at the source of just about any other thread page, no robots meta tag...

Odd, so I guess the mod's must have a way of enabling it on individual threads.

What makes this thread worthy of such a tag?

ivroer

member

Activity: 89

Merit: 14

Quote from: joesmoe2012 on March 10, 2014, 12:10:00 AM

Quote from: ivroer on March 10, 2014, 12:09:12 AM

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on March 10, 2014, 12:00:52 AM

Amazingly, this thread is not being indexed, ergo no Google crawl.

Quote

Well spotted sir, but what would you speculate the motivation is behind that?
Also, am I right to assume only mods and/or admin can set this meta tag on a thread?

I think its assigned on every thread isnt it?

Nah, most of the threads are indexed by search engines. Go have a look at the source of just about any other thread page, no robots meta tag...

joesmoe2012

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 501

Ching-Chang;Ding-Dong

Quote from: StarfishPrime on March 10, 2014, 12:10:25 AM

sold at least once - likely several times - for a paltry 100btc.

He was even willing to sell parts of it for 10BTC if people didn't want the whole thing.

StarfishPrime

sr. member

Activity: 358

Merit: 250

Quote from: RandyMagnum on March 09, 2014, 11:54:35 PM

Just blech. The whole thing continues to be irritating. I was a verified, trusted user, but exited last year. My holdings are safe, but I'm assuming my information is in a digital pile with everyone else, waiting to be sold to the highest bidder; all the while we have what looks like Mark moving close to 300,000 coins around after declaring bankruptcy.

If the final story culminates in Bitcoin Foundation involvement, shame on me I suppose.

The truth will probably be stranger than anything we can imagine right now. My guess is that the 311k coins that have been moving are still safely under trustee control.

Far more unsettling for MtGox users in general should be the fact that a large portion of blockchain has now been mapped directly to specific users (or can easily be), with ID scans, addresses etc. and full trading histories, balances, etc. The entire data dump was supposedly sold at least once - likely several times - for a paltry 100btc.

The Target card skimming scandal is nothing compared to this.

joesmoe2012

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 501

Ching-Chang;Ding-Dong

Quote from: ivroer on March 10, 2014, 12:09:12 AM

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on March 10, 2014, 12:00:52 AM

Amazingly, this thread is not being indexed, ergo no Google crawl.

Quote

Well spotted sir, but what would you speculate the motivation is behind that?
Also, am I right to assume only mods and/or admin can set this meta tag on a thread?

I think its assigned on every thread isnt it?

ivroer

member

Activity: 89

Merit: 14

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on March 10, 2014, 12:00:52 AM

Amazingly, this thread is not being indexed, ergo no Google crawl.

Quote

Well spotted sir, but what would you speculate the motivation is behind that?
Also, am I right to assume only mods and/or admin can set this meta tag on a thread?

Phinnaeus Gage

legendary

Activity: 1918

Merit: 1570

Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending

Amazingly, this thread is not being indexed, ergo no Google crawl.

Quote

StarfishPrime

sr. member

Activity: 358

Merit: 250

Very high probability the 111K is a gox controlled address. At least two gox deposits are confirmed to have been consolidated into this addr.

Phinnaeus Gage

legendary

Activity: 1918

Merit: 1570

Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending

https://blockchain.info/address/1HoTTpCYwAkoR3FCvoRT8WM8UPosYh3S6J

RandyMagnum

sr. member

Activity: 662

Merit: 250

Just blech. The whole thing continues to be irritating. I was a verified, trusted user, but exited last year. My holdings are safe, but I'm assuming my information is in a digital pile with everyone else, waiting to be sold to the highest bidder; all the while we have what looks like Mark moving close to 300,000 coins around after declaring bankruptcy.

If the final story culminates in Bitcoin Foundation involvement, shame on me I suppose.

Topic: 1933 (111,114 BTC) moving - page 2. (Read 7139 times)