A recap (assumming the company is pretending to be using sASICS):
* Company is offering pre-orders before product is ready (which isn't necessary as they would have had to already acquire the sASICS)
We are going in circles here. I see nothing weird about selling their first batch of test chips for a discount for all the reasons already mentioned.
* Company claims product will ship in 4-6 weeks but the prototype isn't even working yet 7 weeks later (the 6 weeks from initial claim was on 11/18 so they already missed that).
IIRC the preorder actually had a 4-8 week delivery schedule. They have not missed that yet. Even if they do, a tiny delay (if that) is evidence of a scam now? Better tell AMD, nVidia, intel, microsoft, etc.
* Company also puts all shipping estimates for new pre-orders at a continual 6 weeks out which just happens to put every single order (both past and future) outside of Paypal chargeback period.
So anything with a 6 week shipping date is suspicious to you? Better tell my Audi dealer as I ordered my car 3 months ago and Im still waiting.
* Speaking of Paypal. The company has the assets to acquire a multi-hundred thousand dollar sASIC design and run but can't accept credit cards via their established merchant account and instead relies on Paypal which has much less protection for the consumer.
And less protection to the seller. I had to give my Audi dealer a certified bank check. Scammers!
* Company calls themselves "Butterfly Labs Inc." but there is no "Butterfly Labs Inc." in the US. There are 12 BF Labs Inc (and one B.F.L. Inc) in the US but nothing on the website links them to that particular entity and no information available for BF Labs Inc link them to Butterfly Labs.
Since you can pay with a bank transfer, Im sure you'll get the correct name and address, though I agree they should put that on their site.
* Company claims to have decade of experience but has no prior products and didn't exist 6 months ago.
Obviously the people in that company have experience and the company is a startup (/spin off). We said the same thing when we spun out a cmos image sensor chip company, since the team had many years of experience, just not under that company name.
* Company planned a public demo 2 weeks ago but was unable to have product working in time.
Big deal. Particularly since that demo was not even officially announced.
* Company has never explained how 32 boards = 50x performance.
* Company claims that product is useful for medical imaging (which would be incompatible w/ sASIC design).
* Company performance claims are not impossible (although improbable) w/ high end sASIC but board voltage and onboard flash loader would indicate high end FPGA not a sASIC.
Not knowing the technical details of their yet to ship product is not evidence of a scam.
* Company now plans a public demo in which no hard numbers can be provided.
Inaba is allowed to say whether or not the board generally meats the performance claims; considering they admit issues with the software, I think thats entirely reasonable. When is the last time AMD or Intel allowed publishing benchmarks of preproduction hardware? If for whatever reason there still is 10-20% lower performance than promised, it doesnt exactly prove a scam or does it.
* Company "knows" board will produce 1.05 GH (note the 3 significant digits) but actually hasn't mined anything yet. They also know the rig box will produce exactly 50.45 GH (an uneven multiplier) despite the simpler product not yet working at the claimed speeds.
+-10% running variance.
* Company (in one of the very few announcements) claimed it wouldn't put rig box up for pre-order until singles had been demoed yet it failed to live up to that claim.
Yeah, there has been a small delay, I think you mentioned that already a few times.