Therefore, I suggest that, the company (site) should be banned or restricted from the Bitcointalk forum, so that people will not fall victim and not to register in it. If the company (site) is still active Bitcointalk forum and they (1xbit) create signature campaign and people apply for it, then the administration of Bitcointalk should be blamed. For that the moderators should not tag the red negative trust to the people that apply. If the site is ban or inactive nobody would apply. We need only legit or genuine activities in this forum. So the administration, moderators should also do their work. Don't blame people that apply for the sit because you keep it active
1 - this is a thread that doesn't belong in this section, you should have created it in the reputation section
2 - as I will say the scam is not moderated, they are not breaking the forum rules.
3 - about them being scammers " although i just think they are scammers ", unfortunately there is still no very concrete proof of what is really happening, example:
there hasn't been a member of this forum that is reliable who has tested this scam site and came to post proof that he had his account blocked, so it's hard for us to know what's really happening with these so many people that almost every week appear in the they thread complain about their account blocked
4 - if the participants of their signature campaign were spamming in this scenario they would be banned from running signature campaign on the forum
as you can see the situation is kind of complex, but if we had a forum member who was someone reliable and created an account on that scam site and they blocked him we could be 100% sure that they are scammers that are blocking people's account