Is this what the fuss was about? "Phoenix Technologies Announces Production of Bitcoin Mining Hardware
http://www.sbwire.com/press-releases/phoenix-technologies-announces-production-of-bitcoin-mining-hardware-302555.htm
http://www.sbwire.com/press-releases/phoenix-technologies-announces-production-of-bitcoin-mining-hardware-302555.htm
Hi Sockpuppet,
no, this link is new. If you want to get our attention, get at least any of those thousands of "Phoenix Technologies" to post it on their site and not some sbwire …
I tried to find the logo and found out that tineye.com is particularly bad at finding text-logos.
Hi Reactionary.
I'm acutely aware that the "press release" from Phoenix Technologies is new. Perhaps I should have been more clear in my question.
How about this: Given the line of reasoning that there was an effort to plant the WSJ article by some sort of firm potentially involving "Andrew Laurus," could the objective have been to create an atmosphere where there's news hype for businesses with the key words of "mining" and "Phoenix?"
Or given that it was directed at the post immediately preceding mine(yes, I've read all ten pages several times), maybe I should have gone with "Yo, Phinneaus, where does this goofy company fit into your findings?"
Or if you prefer, "Sockpuppet." At least I have a title now.
Hey, sorry, you most likely didn't deserve my negative reply. Newbies being the first to find "interesting" links just is too common here. It screams sock puppet but I guess in your case I was wrong.
