Why did a seasoned reporter like Harriet Agnew who's selective about whom she follows on Twitter, opted to follow a guy named Mo Azeel (@MoAzeel) that never followed her and who posted vile tweets? The guy even used a stock image for his Twitter account.
http://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photo-indian-business-man-smiling-image2020520
From Mo's Twitter account.
One of the few people that Mo followed was Frankie Terrier who recently changed his name on Twitter to Andrew Laurus. Of the eight tweets remaining, three are exchanges with Frankie.
That WSJ article was mostly comprised of what Andre/Frankie tweeted, then deleted prior to the original article being published.
I'm still looking to see what Robin's role was in all this.
BTW, if you search Google for Mo Azeel you'll find...wait for it...only 4 results. If was only three, but some monumental asshole mentioned his name on BitcoinTalk.
Bottom line, this was contrived.
Now, I ask you this: How much influence can I bestow upon a person who has never heard of Bitcoin before if I show them a physical copy of the WSJ depicting a whale investing $200M in some Bitcoin venture?
Think about that!
