Pages:
Author

Topic: 2013-12-12 Wired - U.S. Government Nastygram Shuts Down One-Man Bitcoin Mint (Read 6186 times)

legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
Quote
Laws that are important for compliance are:
31 USC § 5330 -  Registration of money transmitting businesses.
18 USC § 1960 -  Prohibition of unlicensed money transmitting businesses.
They are short and easy to read.

Yet somehow vague, easily misinterpreted and arbitrarily enforced and applied.

These are the kinds of totalitarian laws that will ruin a financial system and bring a nation to its knees economically. We've seen these movies before, it is known as the death of a fiat system.
full member
Activity: 285
Merit: 100
Perhaps one can paint a QR code and sell it as art.  Can you still do it by selling just the coins with no XBT value on them at all?
Key definition is following:
Quote
The term “money transmitting service” includes accepting currency or funds denominated in the currency of any country and transmitting the currency or funds, or the value of the currency or funds, by any means through a financial agency or institution, a Federal reserve bank or other facility of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or an electronic funds transfer network.
Laws that are important for compliance are:
31 USC § 5330 -  Registration of money transmitting businesses.
18 USC § 1960 -  Prohibition of unlicensed money transmitting businesses.
They are short and easy to read.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 500
So how mutch coins he wasted ? Wtf what happend to the coins ?
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
So now if I make a physical cookie dough coin I am a money transmitter?

if it has a private key that gives access to virtual currency in  or on it perhaps using chocolate chips for encoding then yes you are a money transmitter.

How do you know?
The definitions seem vague and ill defined and without effective rationale.

I get that we don't want to be helping criminals, but most people aren't criminals and I'm not a policeman, just normal business in low volume and personal level.  Just what level of business needs all taxpayers to pay for monitoring and stored in the central database to prevent the purported threats?

please get a sense of humor...

Cookies cant be laundering money, they are crumby at it.
and besides, I spent all my dough when the chips were down.

(see, my humor isn't really better than taking it seriously)
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1006
First 100% Liquid Stablecoin Backed by Gold
Would be interesting to "transmit" money through the mail using colored Legos.  The Legos themselves wouldn't be the money, just the colors as they are stacked.
Perhaps one can paint a QR code and sell it as art.  Can you still do it by selling just the coins with no XBT value on them at all?
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
i thought about this more... the guy is selling a piece of metal with a code on it that stores money from the purchaser... it's like going to Cartier and buying a nice leather wallet and putting your credit cards and cash into it before completing the purchase of the wallet.

Did Cartier engage in money transmission?

Basically now EVERY COMMERCE TRANSACTION is money transmission?

I'm guilty I guess, I transmitted some money to the local coffee shop for some coffee.  Please arrest me.



This is very apt.
Casascius pieces are wallets.  Part of the payment goes in the wallet.
If the invoices were itemized as such, then it would be about the same as you describe.

I can't see how this is money transfer unless the wallets are going directly to persons other than the purchasers.
It is a product sale.

This registration requirement ought be challenged, even if you are also complying for simplicity's sake.

It is more like buying a leather wallet online that happens to come with 10 crisp $100 bills in it, and paying $1000 + the price of the wallet.

I can see where it presents issues, but i can also see that there must be room for more clarity
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1031

Mike did a fantastic job of getting Bitcoin into the mainstream. The photos of his physical coins are everywhere and much more advanced-looking than any ordinary coin.

Eventually, I expect the Smithsonian will be wanting one to put on display.


One is already on display in some European (I believe England) museum.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
i thought about this more... the guy is selling a piece of metal with a code on it that stores money from the purchaser... it's like going to Cartier and buying a nice leather wallet and putting your credit cards and cash into it before completing the purchase of the wallet.

Did Cartier engage in money transmission?

Basically now EVERY COMMERCE TRANSACTION is money transmission?

I'm guilty I guess, I transmitted some money to the local coffee shop for some coffee.  Please arrest me.



This is very apt.
Casascius pieces are wallets.  Part of the payment goes in the wallet.
If the invoices were itemized as such, then it would be about the same as you describe.

I can't see how this is money transfer unless the wallets are going directly to persons other than the purchasers.
It is a product sale.

This registration requirement ought be challenged, even if you are also complying for simplicity's sake.
full member
Activity: 285
Merit: 100
More reasonable is Mike's method of doing the perfunctory compliance requested, and then challenging the justification for it.
The person who challenges FINCEN could be anyone, just by showing intention to start similar business and filing complaint that FINCEN regulation is a significant burden.
The cost to file (Federal court) is $350.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto News & Tutorials - Coinramble.com
The real problem that the govs have with bitcoin, is that it's no good for accepting bribes. Because, the bribery transaction would be on the blockchain, if not, then their bitcoin would be worthless.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1010
he who has the gold makes the rules
i thought about this more... the guy is selling a piece of metal with a code on it that stores money from the purchaser... it's like going to Cartier and buying a nice leather wallet and putting your credit cards and cash into it before completing the purchase of the wallet.

Did Cartier engage in money transmission?

Basically now EVERY COMMERCE TRANSACTION is money transmission?

I'm guilty I guess, I transmitted some money to the local coffee shop for some coffee.  Please arrest me.

legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
Please report every single shop that sells gold or other precious metals and has a facility to post them to customers. And every shop that allows you to send them gold in exchange for cash.

Seriously. They are all money transmitters and if not regulated, they are breaking the law. File an online report to FinCen, its your duty to help protect the US of A.

Is this really the case? Wasn't gold demonetized in the US? The Bernank calls it an "asset".



Gold has its own set of rules.  Dealers still have to report on purchases or sales over a certain amount, but its mainly to prevent gold being used as a tax shelter, from what I've been told.  

It also depends on whether it's bars of gold bullion or coins being sold, as the requirements for reporting sales / purchases of coins is less stringent.

Mike, you may want to look into the laws for selling your Silver coins specifically, because there are specific rules regarding precious metals that might serve as a loophole under which you can clearly operate without doing KYC/AML.

There's not so much a loophole, as an entirely separate reporting regime for taxation purposes, though both IRS, and FinCEN are branches of the treasury dept, CFTC which governs reporting requirements for coins/bullion is an independent agency.  Its more the case that if Mike were putting stickers on American Eagles, he could run afoul of another reporting problem.
http://www.coinworld.com/articles/what-coins-are-reportable
FinCEN isn't a "revenue" (taxing) authority, it is the white collar crime enforcement branch of the treasury dept.  There is a lot of regulatory authority in the US for this stuff, but the FinCEN involvement is a bit weird, out of place.  It is hard to see where they have any reasonable interest worthy of such concerns.
sr. member
Activity: 366
Merit: 258
Please report every single shop that sells gold or other precious metals and has a facility to post them to customers. And every shop that allows you to send them gold in exchange for cash.

Seriously. They are all money transmitters and if not regulated, they are breaking the law. File an online report to FinCen, its your duty to help protect the US of A.

Is this really the case? Wasn't gold demonetized in the US? The Bernank calls it an "asset".



Gold has its own set of rules.  Dealers still have to report on purchases or sales over a certain amount, but its mainly to prevent gold being used as a tax shelter, from what I've been told. 

It also depends on whether it's bars of gold bullion or coins being sold, as the requirements for reporting sales / purchases of coins is less stringent.

Mike, you may want to look into the laws for selling your Silver coins specifically, because there are specific rules regarding precious metals that might serve as a loophole under which you can clearly operate without doing KYC/AML.

 
sr. member
Activity: 366
Merit: 258
Please report every single shop that sells gold or other precious metals and has a facility to post them to customers. And every shop that allows you to send them gold in exchange for cash.

Seriously. They are all money transmitters and if not regulated, they are breaking the law. File an online report to FinCen, its your duty to help protect the US of A.

Is this really the case? Wasn't gold demonetized in the US? The Bernank calls it an "asset".


If your idea is to break the system through over-compliance, that would not result in anything better than the way things are.

More reasonable is Mike's method of doing the perfunctory compliance requested, and then challenging the justification for it.
He's not a money transmitter if you are selling to purchasers.
Money transmitters send money to those other than from whom they received them, and there isn't any evidence that Mike is doing that.
FinCEN is concerned that with the volume of money, there might be some folks making use of Mike's good will efforts to engage in their own money transfers by buying things for others without Mike knowing and probably think he should be making sure the folks paying for something are the folks receiving it, which takes a bit of KYC.

Alternatively if he sent the stuff signature-required, that would also probably cover himself too.  FinCEN is really barking up the wrong tree here.  Mike's simply a merchant selling a product.

I agree completely that FinCEN is barking up the wrong tree.  The ONLY issue they have to stand on is the KYC issue. 

From what I understand, (and maybe you could clarify the justification here, Mike) because the bitcoin address Mike's receiving payment from isn't attached to an identity explicitly, he doesn't necessarily know that he is collecting money from the same person that he is sending money to.

Isn't that the crux of the issue?

sr. member
Activity: 366
Merit: 258
Would be interesting to "transmit" money through the mail using colored Legos.  The Legos themselves wouldn't be the money, just the colors as they are stacked.

I'm personally looking forward to the days when any person on the street can be arbitrarily arrested for money transmission.

"I didn't do it, I swear!"

"I caught you thinking about it, I know that look"


I wonder whether customs officials are gonna start inspecting non-uniform patterns in peoples shoe-hole lacing for codified private keys? Shuffling your deck of cards with you hooked up to a ECG?  Cheesy


You guys make me laugh on a very deep and philosphical level.

legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
Please report every single shop that sells gold or other precious metals and has a facility to post them to customers. And every shop that allows you to send them gold in exchange for cash.

Seriously. They are all money transmitters and if not regulated, they are breaking the law. File an online report to FinCen, its your duty to help protect the US of A.

Is this really the case? Wasn't gold demonetized in the US? The Bernank calls it an "asset".

It isn't the case, and it also wouldn't matter if gold were "money".  It still isn't money transmission in the sense of a regulated activity for simple merchants.  This isn't money laundering.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
Please report every single shop that sells gold or other precious metals and has a facility to post them to customers. And every shop that allows you to send them gold in exchange for cash.

Seriously. They are all money transmitters and if not regulated, they are breaking the law. File an online report to FinCen, its your duty to help protect the US of A.

Is this really the case? Wasn't gold demonetized in the US? The Bernank calls it an "asset".


If your idea is to break the system through over-compliance, that would not result in anything better than the way things are.

More reasonable is Mike's method of doing the perfunctory compliance requested, and then challenging the justification for it.
He's not a money transmitter if you are selling to purchasers.
Money transmitters send money to those other than from whom they received them, and there isn't any evidence that Mike is doing that.
FinCEN is concerned that with the volume of money, there might be some folks making use of Mike's good will efforts to engage in their own money transfers by buying things for others without Mike knowing and probably think he should be making sure the folks paying for something are the folks receiving it, which takes a bit of KYC.

Alternatively if he sent the stuff signature-required, that would also probably cover himself too.  FinCEN is really barking up the wrong tree here.  Mike's simply a merchant selling a product.
legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
Would be interesting to "transmit" money through the mail using colored Legos.  The Legos themselves wouldn't be the money, just the colors as they are stacked.

I'm personally looking forward to the days when any person on the street can be arbitrarily arrested for money transmission.

"I didn't do it, I swear!"

"I caught you thinking about it, I know that look"


I wonder whether customs officials are gonna start inspecting non-uniform patterns in peoples shoe-hole lacing for codified private keys? Shuffling your deck of cards with you hooked up to a ECG?  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1006
100 satoshis -> ISO code
Please report every single shop that sells gold or other precious metals and has a facility to post them to customers. And every shop that allows you to send them gold in exchange for cash.

Seriously. They are all money transmitters and if not regulated, they are breaking the law. File an online report to FinCen, its your duty to help protect the US of A.

Is this really the case? Wasn't gold demonetized in the US? The Bernank calls it an "asset".

legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
Please report every single shop that sells gold or other precious metals and has a facility to post them to customers. And every shop that allows you to send them gold in exchange for cash.

Seriously. They are all money transmitters and if not regulated, they are breaking the law. File an online report to FinCen, its your duty to help protect the US of A.
Pages:
Jump to: