At this difficulty, I'm not sure this pool is sustainable at this hash rate.
80 hours per block (average) is way too much variance. I feel like I am losing money mining here and it is my own pool.
But the last thing I want to do is shut it down. There are not enough pools and too much mining power is in too few.
Topic: [~32 TH] HHTT - Selected Diff/Stratum/PPLNS/Paid Stales/High Availability/Tor - page 4. (Read 29733 times)
December 30, 2013, 11:42:35 AM
December 24, 2013, 04:34:43 PM
Any chance FD would add MM for NMC, DVC, IXC? Over a month all those add up...
You're talking merged mining?
Correct...
December 24, 2013, 02:48:06 AM
This is going to hurt...
spiccioli
spiccioli
Damn...Long dry spell.
December 23, 2013, 01:58:55 PM
Any chance FD would add MM for NMC, DVC, IXC? Over a month all those add up...
You're talking merged mining?
December 18, 2013, 09:20:10 PM
Any chance FD would add MM for NMC, DVC, IXC? Over a month all those add up...
December 13, 2013, 07:18:49 AM
What is going to hurt?
Three days without blocks
but we went through... spiccioli
Lot of power came on recently. Good stuff, I know about 4thash I talked over from gigas pool.
November 27, 2013, 09:23:38 AM
What is going to hurt?
Three days without blocks
but we went through... spiccioli
November 26, 2013, 12:45:37 PM
What is going to hurt?
November 26, 2013, 03:45:18 AM
This is going to hurt...
spiccioli
spiccioli
November 24, 2013, 08:15:33 PM
I like Orpahans. You should keep it.
November 24, 2013, 12:48:10 PM
Hey gents, on the main mage we show "Orpahans", it should be Orphans.
-Wave
-Wave
Wave,
it this pool we say orpahans...
spiccioli
I guess I couldn't change it now.
November 22, 2013, 09:20:23 AM
Hey gents, on the main mage we show "Orpahans", it should be Orphans.
-Wave
-Wave
Wave,
it this pool we say orpahans...
spiccioli
November 22, 2013, 08:30:59 AM
Hey gents, on the main mage we show "Orpahans", it should be Orphans.
-Wave
-Wave
November 18, 2013, 03:17:32 PM
Support the discouraging of address re-use.
The exchange rate value of everyone's Bitcoins depends on killing the lists. Including you, me, spiccioli, and everyone mining, pooled, decentrally or solo.
spiccioli, please consider using the address re-use de-prioritising mining node. This will be a step along the way to preventing the public blockchain record from being used against us to devalue our Bitcoins.
Everyone at HHTT should familiarise themselves with the forthcoming HD wallets feature, keychains. You can create as many keychains as you wish, just like single addresses. This will let you lock reward payments to a sequence of crytographically determined keychain addresses instead of one address. It is a superior alternative to locking to a static address, you can gain more privacy with the same level of security.
HD wallets will likely be available in the 0.9 Bitcoin client.
Support the discouraging of address re-use.
So whatever this thread spam is aside, I've been thinking about that.
For example, if someone wanted to give me an electrum master public key, I could send payments for them to unused addresses on that chain. I'd be glad to support any other deterministic schemes I could find software for.
Example (not implemented, stated as an example):
A person mines with a username of an electrum master public key. In the suckers list and status pages HHTT would show something like HMAC(mpk, 'hhtt').substring(0, 20). That way, no one would be able to see the who mpk. Then when doing a payment, I would find an unused address on that mpk chain and send the payment to that. I would also stop posting transaction IDs to make it harder to figure out who each miner was in the payment transactions. Still possible, but hard after the fact. The transactions would of course still be visible, but not how much each miner was paid and which miner is which.
November 16, 2013, 04:59:00 PM
Support the discouraging of address re-use.
The exchange rate value of everyone's Bitcoins depends on killing the lists. Including you, me, spiccioli, and everyone mining, pooled, decentrally or solo.
spiccioli, please consider using the address re-use de-prioritising mining node. This will be a step along the way to preventing the public blockchain record from being used against us to devalue our Bitcoins.
Everyone at HHTT should familiarise themselves with the forthcoming HD wallets feature, keychains. You can create as many keychains as you wish, just like single addresses. This will let you lock reward payments to a sequence of crytographically determined keychain addresses instead of one address. It is a superior alternative to locking to a static address, you can gain more privacy with the same level of security.
HD wallets will likely be available in the 0.9 Bitcoin client.
Support the discouraging of address re-use.
November 16, 2013, 09:06:58 AM
Here we go again!
1bush8 gets 0.27 per block (more or less) and today solving latest block he/she got a nice 0.36 prize!
HHTT is the only pool doing this kind of lottery
spiccioli
1bush8 gets 0.27 per block (more or less) and today solving latest block he/she got a nice 0.36 prize!
HHTT is the only pool doing this kind of lottery
spiccioli
November 14, 2013, 09:23:08 AM
It's been a little dry lately, come on lucky blocks, where you hiding?
Lucky periods, per definition, last a lot less than unlucky ones... you can see a lucky period as a reward for enduring an unlucky one
spiccioli
November 14, 2013, 04:50:06 AM
It's been a little dry lately, come on lucky blocks, where you hiding?
November 09, 2013, 08:54:39 PM
Congrats to someone
https://blockchain.info/block-index/438763/00000000000000018914e17bd674c5d8069ce463e00750cb838b91d3b0ac80c3
https://blockchain.info/block-index/438763/00000000000000018914e17bd674c5d8069ce463e00750cb838b91d3b0ac80c3
Woooww!
I need to put a link on it on the OP
spiccioli
Transaction is:
https://blockchain.info/tx/8e9adefd0608b4525d2d35e80247911516d2afcfee8d6bb121c63197ef275df0?show_adv=true
with 18.7908 BTC fee.
I wonder if it was a poorly constructed transaction by hand or a wonky fee calculator (that transaction is indeed huge).
Seems like those fees are intentional.
November 09, 2013, 11:51:25 AM
Congrats to someone
https://blockchain.info/block-index/438763/00000000000000018914e17bd674c5d8069ce463e00750cb838b91d3b0ac80c3
https://blockchain.info/block-index/438763/00000000000000018914e17bd674c5d8069ce463e00750cb838b91d3b0ac80c3
Woooww!
I need to put a link on it on the OP
spiccioli
Transaction is:
https://blockchain.info/tx/8e9adefd0608b4525d2d35e80247911516d2afcfee8d6bb121c63197ef275df0?show_adv=true
with 18.7908 BTC fee.
I wonder if it was a poorly constructed transaction by hand or a wonky fee calculator (that transaction is indeed huge).
Jump to: