Nevermind...
K.
Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool - page 717. (Read 4382769 times)
May 24, 2013, 05:07:36 AM
18179 is about to be confirmed as well
Nevermind...
K.
Nevermind...
K.
May 24, 2013, 05:02:00 AM
Slush,
one of the stratum servers seems to have some sort of connection problems with database. Even tho my miner is sending hashes, which are accepted allright, workers "Last share at" increases upto around 15 minutes. then (I presume the connection gets restored) all the sudden "Last share at" decreases back to zero. Refreshing web pages shows "Last share at" going 15->13->9->7->3->0 in less than a minute.
one of the stratum servers seems to have some sort of connection problems with database. Even tho my miner is sending hashes, which are accepted allright, workers "Last share at" increases upto around 15 minutes. then (I presume the connection gets restored) all the sudden "Last share at" decreases back to zero. Refreshing web pages shows "Last share at" going 15->13->9->7->3->0 in less than a minute.
If you use cgminer you can specify failover pools you can do api2.bitcoin,cz, stratum.bitcion,cz, stratum2.bitcoin.cz, etc all at the same time. This seemed to have stopped these for me.
Eric
May 24, 2013, 04:42:36 AM
I am unable to receive e-mail from [email protected] ...
Could you activate my account ? Here is the line
from Exim's reject log:
2013-05-24 05:33:30 1UfoNO-0003HV-OF H=mt.chemispol.cz (fik.chemispol.cz) [80.92.250.103] F=<[email protected]> rejected after DATA: syntax error in 'From:' header when scanning for sender: malformed address: <[email protected]> may not follow [email protected] in "[email protected] <[email protected]>"
Envelope-from: <[email protected]>
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
Subject: [mining.bitcoin.cz] New account confirmation
F From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
X-DKIM-Status: none [(bitcoin.cz) - 80.92.250.103]
Could you activate my account ? Here is the line
from Exim's reject log:
2013-05-24 05:33:30 1UfoNO-0003HV-OF H=mt.chemispol.cz (fik.chemispol.cz) [80.92.250.103] F=<[email protected]> rejected after DATA: syntax error in 'From:' header when scanning for sender: malformed address: <[email protected]> may not follow [email protected] in "[email protected] <[email protected]>"
Envelope-from: <[email protected]>
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
Subject: [mining.bitcoin.cz] New account confirmation
F From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
X-DKIM-Status: none [(bitcoin.cz) - 80.92.250.103]
May 24, 2013, 04:17:06 AM
Let's give it some time - yesterday it took over half an hour to get self-fixed. Mine is off too:
18176 2013-05-23 19:51:28 2:06:53 17624457 1650 0.00108921 none 237567 25.58627000 90 confirmations left
and earlier when I looked (at around 19:05 server time) my score had just reset and showed almost zero (a few microcoins).
Possibly but its been more than an hour and the # of shares looks normal when its updating the shares usually increases. I also noticed 20 minutes prior to it ending the numbers reset.
It's now been several more hours and at least for me the rewards haven't been recalculated although miner was working non-stop.
18176 2013-05-23 19:51:28 2:06:53 17624457 1837 0.00130912 237567 25.58627000 36 confirmations left
I guess it's just a bout of bad luck. Well, can't complain, with overall good luck yesterday, it's still profitable.
By the way - does anyone else have any issues with this one - I'm quite a bit short on it too:
18179 2013-05-23 20:42:16 0:15:23 1329197 202 0.00287789 none 237575 25.35675211 44 confirmations left
A little short on that too if I calculate the reward per share.
Block 18176 is off for many of us. Have been waiting for the rewards to get recalculated, then sent a message to Slush at the time when there were only 12 confirmations left.
The block just got confirmed, no adjustments. Obviously, it would be chaotic and unmanagable if everyone cries about blocks, and there should be a proper way to escalate these issues and get them addressed on time. In many cases Slush is able to intervene, but on few occasions the issue does not get fixed.
What would be the preferred way of bringing attention to these issues - especially given that the spam-rate on this thread is rather high so Slush might not be able to notice/catch posts.
Cheers,
T
PS: dear trolls, I am not complaining about the quality of service Slush provides, but seek a way how he could be notified of pool related issues is a smart way - without highly redundant communication - in the future. This topic would have been the proper communication channel but given the white noise...
May 24, 2013, 03:05:51 AM
Slush,
one of the stratum servers seems to have some sort of connection problems with database. Even tho my miner is sending hashes, which are accepted allright, workers "Last share at" increases upto around 15 minutes. then (I presume the connection gets restored) all the sudden "Last share at" decreases back to zero. Refreshing web pages shows "Last share at" going 15->13->9->7->3->0 in less than a minute.
Jp that is why I'm still afraid to move any big miner back and waiting for conformation from slush that he solved this problem. I lost on too many rounds because of this... Slush did report that it is problem with Amazon EC2 Instances... one of the stratum servers seems to have some sort of connection problems with database. Even tho my miner is sending hashes, which are accepted allright, workers "Last share at" increases upto around 15 minutes. then (I presume the connection gets restored) all the sudden "Last share at" decreases back to zero. Refreshing web pages shows "Last share at" going 15->13->9->7->3->0 in less than a minute.
May 24, 2013, 01:51:39 AM
Slush,
one of the stratum servers seems to have some sort of connection problems with database. Even tho my miner is sending hashes, which are accepted allright, workers "Last share at" increases upto around 15 minutes. then (I presume the connection gets restored) all the sudden "Last share at" decreases back to zero. Refreshing web pages shows "Last share at" going 15->13->9->7->3->0 in less than a minute.
one of the stratum servers seems to have some sort of connection problems with database. Even tho my miner is sending hashes, which are accepted allright, workers "Last share at" increases upto around 15 minutes. then (I presume the connection gets restored) all the sudden "Last share at" decreases back to zero. Refreshing web pages shows "Last share at" going 15->13->9->7->3->0 in less than a minute.
May 24, 2013, 12:09:53 AM
Slush:
http://blockchain.info/block-index/385234/00000000000000f595dabc67b09229d6cd93224da85c46415f5c782e09ab576f
It's not registered but I think it showed up for a short while just before 237575 was found. Guess we got too lucky for our own good.
This was mentioned a couple of pages back but with the activity here it's easy to miss it. Time for a separate "chat thread" perhaps?
http://blockchain.info/block-index/385234/00000000000000f595dabc67b09229d6cd93224da85c46415f5c782e09ab576f
It's not registered but I think it showed up for a short while just before 237575 was found. Guess we got too lucky for our own good.
This was mentioned a couple of pages back but with the activity here it's easy to miss it. Time for a separate "chat thread" perhaps?
May 24, 2013, 12:05:10 AM
Let's give it some time - yesterday it took over half an hour to get self-fixed. Mine is off too:
18176 2013-05-23 19:51:28 2:06:53 17624457 1650 0.00108921 none 237567 25.58627000 90 confirmations left
and earlier when I looked (at around 19:05 server time) my score had just reset and showed almost zero (a few microcoins).
Possibly but its been more than an hour and the # of shares looks normal when its updating the shares usually increases. I also noticed 20 minutes prior to it ending the numbers reset.
It's now been several more hours and at least for me the rewards haven't been recalculated although miner was working non-stop.
18176 2013-05-23 19:51:28 2:06:53 17624457 1837 0.00130912 237567 25.58627000 36 confirmations left
I guess it's just a bout of bad luck. Well, can't complain, with overall good luck yesterday, it's still profitable.
By the way - does anyone else have any issues with this one - I'm quite a bit short on it too:
18179 2013-05-23 20:42:16 0:15:23 1329197 202 0.00287789 none 237575 25.35675211 44 confirmations left
A little short on that too if I calculate the reward per share.
May 23, 2013, 11:41:15 PM
Looks like #18176 is another victim of the score reset. Or is it just me?
Me too.
K.
18176 2013-05-23 19:51:28 2:06:53 17624457 1650 0.00108921 none 237567 25.58627000 90 confirmations left
and earlier when I looked (at around 19:05 server time) my score had just reset and showed almost zero (a few microcoins).
Possibly but its been more than an hour and the # of shares looks normal when its updating the shares usually increases. I also noticed 20 minutes prior to it ending the numbers reset.
It seems this one may not get fixed ...
By the way - does anyone else have any issues with this one - I'm quite a bit short on it too:
18179 2013-05-23 20:42:16 0:15:23 1329197 202 0.00287789 none 237575 25.35675211 44 confirmations left
May 23, 2013, 11:15:14 PM
because slush just has not set it up, that is all. I hope he decides to do so.
May 23, 2013, 11:13:21 PM
1 NMC = 0.0075 BTC
Why do we need it?
Why do we need it?
We don't, but since it doesn't cost anything, why not make it?
+100
Please add NMC to stratum... Pretty please!?!
if NMC was added to Stratum then we would make a lot more NMC and have a lot more blocks, I wonder if we would accidentally 51% it
15 blocks per 04:00
is bitminter stratum mining namecoins?
if so how can they and slush cant
May 23, 2013, 11:09:51 PM
Hm, today's luck has been around 144% , does this mean difficulty is going to rise pretty high next adjustment?
We had a lucky day today, earlier this week we had a couple of unlucky days as well. It all balances out. You can't use a single day or even a single week as a basis for expectations of how the future will pan out, you need to look at a much larger sample size. Compare all of today on all of the large pools for example, then average the data from all of those pools for a month. Our good luck benefited us today, but it's just a small ripple in the ocean when you start looking at the big picture
Yeah, luck was good. Would've been even better if Block 237574 had made it into the pool database.
[Edit] Wonder where it went.
well... not sure but http://blockchain.info/blocks/Slush shows as Slush's pool....
May 23, 2013, 11:03:06 PM
fees for any perks, and your contribution is a smaller percentage
hm actually I take that back, I hopped on their pool for 3 blocks yesterday and now I have an OK balance in my account
Or dig a lot, or not produce entirely!
May 23, 2013, 10:59:43 PM
1 NMC = 0.0075 BTC
Why do we need it?
Why do we need it?
We don't, but since it doesn't cost anything, why not make it?
+100
Please add NMC to stratum... Pretty please!?!
if NMC was added to Stratum then we would make a lot more NMC and have a lot more blocks, I wonder if we would accidentally 51% it
but you can't make sh*t at bitminer
fees for any perks, and your contribution is a smaller percentage
hm actually I take that back, I hopped on their pool for 3 blocks yesterday and now I have an OK balance in my account
May 23, 2013, 10:58:19 PM
1 NMC = 0.0075 BTC
Why do we need it?
Why do we need it?
We don't, but since it doesn't cost anything, why not make it?
+100
Please add NMC to stratum... Pretty please!?!
if NMC was added to Stratum then we would make a lot more NMC and have a lot more blocks, I wonder if we would accidentally 51% it
15 blocks per 04:00
May 23, 2013, 10:45:12 PM
current round duration 4:43:44
I guess things are evening out again haa
I guess things are evening out again haa
May 23, 2013, 10:43:54 PM
1 NMC = 0.0075 BTC
Why do we need it?
Why do we need it?
We don't, but since it doesn't cost anything, why not make it?
+100
Please add NMC to stratum... Pretty please!?!
if NMC was added to Stratum then we would make a lot more NMC and have a lot more blocks, I wonder if we would accidentally 51% it
May 23, 2013, 10:27:34 PM
1 NMC = 0.0075 BTC
Why do we need it?
Why do we need it?
We don't, but since it doesn't cost anything, why not make it?
+100
Please add NMC to stratum... Pretty please!?!
May 23, 2013, 10:24:28 PM
1 NMC = 0.0075 BTC
Why do we need it?
Why do we need it?
We don't, but since it doesn't cost anything, why not make it?
May 23, 2013, 10:20:09 PM
1 NMC = 0.0075 BTC
Why do we need it?
Why do we need it?
Jump to: