Author

Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool - page 951. (Read 4382653 times)

legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
Since merged mining began on site I've found my system has become unstable when mining btc. Is seems fine on my backup site for mining.

Of course there was big problems with connectivity due to DDoS attacks. Not sure if you counted it. There was also few issues with backends two weeks back when pool started with merged mining, but then I disconnected problematic pools and thanks to recent update of backends, merged mining does not affect mining at all; now it's definitely not an issue. Thanks to my pool monitoring I can tell that now is pool in excellent condition.

Quote
Recently you said the whole network is used though for merged mining could this be causing issues for those of us that aren't interested in namecoins? If it is why not offer an opt out from merged mining for those of us that don't wish to mine namecoins?

Merged mining, when done properly, cannot affect "non-namecoin" users. And I'm absolutely sure that merged mining is working great. Technically merged mining is only small patch for bitcoin backend, nothing what you can 'opt out'. If you're not interested in namecoin, it won't affect you at all and you even don't need to know that your hashrate is 'used for merged mining'. However if you claim your namecoin address, you'll get bunch of coins on top of your bitcoin income.
hero member
Activity: 1138
Merit: 523
Quote
Since merged mining began on site I've found my system has become unstable when mining btc. Is seems fine on my backup site for mining. I also have found that I keep getting connection problems. I am only mining btc and haven't set up a wallet for namecoins and with the instablility issues when mining recently at your site I'm not sure I want to. Recently you said the whole network is used though for merged mining could this be causing issues for those of us that aren't interested in namecoins? If it is why not offer an opt out from merged mining for those of us that don't wish to mine namecoins?

Try using all polcmb and cgminers. It's running rock solid for me and I have just about the crappiest most unstable connection imaginable.

BTW Slush,

Would it be possible with a further increase in the NMC limit? Just so we can keep it to 1 payment a day? Having a ton of different payments come in during a day is confusing. I realize that you aren't a bank but plz  Grin
full member
Activity: 152
Merit: 102
Since merged mining began on site I've found my system has become unstable when mining btc. Is seems fine on my backup site for mining. I also have found that I keep getting connection problems. I am only mining btc and haven't set up a wallet for namecoins and with the instablility issues when mining recently at your site I'm not sure I want to. Recently you said the whole network is used though for merged mining could this be causing issues for those of us that aren't interested in namecoins? If it is why not offer an opt out from merged mining for those of us that don't wish to mine namecoins?
full member
Activity: 124
Merit: 100
I just lazily did not count NMC per day, there is only a btc per day graph available.
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
0.4 btc per 24 hours on deepbit with near 0% 24-hour luck and 0.27 btc plus uncounted amount of NMC here...

so basically either the pool is super unlucky atm or mm is not as harmless as is was promised to be. we'll see in a few more days just to exclude the possibility of extreme unluck...

What's your stale ratio?

And yes, there were two 6+ hours in last 24 hours, so you're right. It's just a "luck". Btw what's "uncounted amount"?

Quote
or mm is not as harmless as it was promised to be

No, MM is definitely not an issue :-)
full member
Activity: 124
Merit: 100
0.4 btc per 24 hours on deepbit with near 0% 24-hour luck and 0.27 btc plus uncounted amount of NMC here...

so basically either the pool is super unlucky atm or mm is not as harmless as is was promised to be. we'll see in a few more days just to exclude the possibility of extreme unluck...
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
Nothing you need to do.  It is handled for you.  Ntime rolling allows the miner to re-use a getwork request by incrementing the timestamp locally for a rolling period of time.  This reduces the amount of communication necessary between the pool and miner.

NTime is great improvement of network layer, however current (latest) phoenix still doesn't support it. AFAIk only poclbm and maybe cgminer is using NTime rolling; jedi95 promised NTime rolling for next phoenix release.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Shame on everything; regret nothing.
duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude like I joined your pool!

Looks like it's alot more stable now!  I want me some NMC dude!  So all I had to do was put in my NMC wallet address right?

I'm liking your pool so far, enjoy my modest ~600 MH/s!!!!  :-D

OH BTW I forgot to ask about "Ntime rolling" ... I'm using the latest version of Phoenix with the phatk kernel under Linuxcoin... is there anything I have to do on the command line to enable this "Ntime rolling"?  Also, what the heck is it??  :-D

Nothing you need to do.  It is handled for you.  Ntime rolling allows the miner to re-use a getwork request by incrementing the timestamp locally for a rolling period of time.  This reduces the amount of communication necessary between the pool and miner.

Jagged, thanks!
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude like I joined your pool!

Looks like it's alot more stable now!  I want me some NMC dude!  So all I had to do was put in my NMC wallet address right?

I'm liking your pool so far, enjoy my modest ~600 MH/s!!!!  :-D

OH BTW I forgot to ask about "Ntime rolling" ... I'm using the latest version of Phoenix with the phatk kernel under Linuxcoin... is there anything I have to do on the command line to enable this "Ntime rolling"?  Also, what the heck is it??  :-D

Nothing you need to do.  It is handled for you.  Ntime rolling allows the miner to re-use a getwork request by incrementing the timestamp locally for a rolling period of time.  This reduces the amount of communication necessary between the pool and miner.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Shame on everything; regret nothing.
duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude like I joined your pool!

Looks like it's alot more stable now!  I want me some NMC dude!  So all I had to do was put in my NMC wallet address right?

I'm liking your pool so far, enjoy my modest ~600 MH/s!!!!  :-D

OH BTW I forgot to ask about "Ntime rolling" ... I'm using the latest version of Phoenix with the phatk kernel under Linuxcoin... is there anything I have to do on the command line to enable this "Ntime rolling"?  Also, what the heck is it??  :-D
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Shame on everything; regret nothing.
duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude like I joined your pool!

Looks like it's alot more stable now!  I want me some NMC dude!  So all I had to do was put in my NMC wallet address right?

I'm liking your pool so far, enjoy my modest ~600 MH/s!!!!  :-D
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
wow, it feels like my NMC rewards have quadrupled!


 Couple of nice, short NMC rounds certainly didn't hurt on top of Slush getting all the merged working. Good stuff, m8~

 'Variance' can also be a big ol bitch too. *grumbles, dirty lil tramp*
sr. member
Activity: 298
Merit: 250
wow, it feels like my NMC rewards have quadrupled!
full member
Activity: 152
Merit: 102
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
Are you saying we're going to make more NMC per Mhash from now on?

Yes, much more. Until now only weakest backends were merged mining. All backends were doing merged mining only for short period on the beginning, before I realized that it's crashing under high load. But now is 100% of pool power on NMC. Momchil is my hero.
hero member
Activity: 1138
Merit: 523
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Maybe you noticed short restart of backends. I pulled all backends to merged mining, so you should see much higher namecoin rewards since now. Many thanks to m0mchil who helped me with combining "merged mining patch" together with previous pool optimizations.

Are you saying we're going to make more NMC per Mhash from now on?
donator
Activity: 446
Merit: 262
Interesting.
Quote from: someone
api.bitcoin.cz



 Grin
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
Maybe you noticed short restart of backends. I pulled all backends to merged mining, so you should see much higher namecoin rewards since now. Many thanks to m0mchil who helped me with combining "merged mining patch" together with previous pool optimizations.
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080
welcome back online slush  Grin my miners are now once again yours to command! :p lool

Jump to: