On a 5 hour block..
Wonder if this one will be invalid too! ?
Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool - page 986. (Read 4382653 times)
August 02, 2011, 07:11:54 AM
August 01, 2011, 09:58:52 PM
Hi there 
Uhmm I noticed that your pool has been added to this bithopper programm...
It says in the config file that this pool uses a broken scoring algorithm :/
Should we worry about that? One main reason I am mining here is, that
I was thinking the score based system would protect somewhat from the pool hoppers.
On the other hand the pool is pretty big, so the effect they have on the
rest of the pool is probably very small. Still worries me a bit.
Uhmm I noticed that your pool has been added to this bithopper programm...
It says in the config file that this pool uses a broken scoring algorithm :/
Should we worry about that? One main reason I am mining here is, that
I was thinking the score based system would protect somewhat from the pool hoppers.
On the other hand the pool is pretty big, so the effect they have on the
rest of the pool is probably very small. Still worries me a bit.
We are only hopping for the fun of it on slush, our way to *cough pay back some btc *cough* to the pools.
August 01, 2011, 09:15:22 PM
Hi there
Uhmm I noticed that your pool has been added to this bithopper programm...
It says in the config file that this pool uses a broken scoring algorithm :/
Should we worry about that? One main reason I am mining here is, that
I was thinking the score based system would protect somewhat from the pool hoppers.
On the other hand the pool is pretty big, so the effect they have on the
rest of the pool is probably very small. Still worries me a bit.
Uhmm I noticed that your pool has been added to this bithopper programm...
It says in the config file that this pool uses a broken scoring algorithm :/
Should we worry about that? One main reason I am mining here is, that
I was thinking the score based system would protect somewhat from the pool hoppers.
On the other hand the pool is pretty big, so the effect they have on the
rest of the pool is probably very small. Still worries me a bit.
August 01, 2011, 08:27:08 AM
I'm still having the problem that my payout seems about 14% lower than expected.
Part of it is stale shares (about 1.6%).
Then maybe some commission.
But after that, i can't find any reason.
I'm mining @351MH/s and it's very consistent, no network drops or similar.
The graph on bitcoin7 shows this consistency, but it settles around 0.18BC .
The bitcoin calculatoirs predicts 0.21BC at current difficulty (1690906).
So, where does this difference come from and how do i get it back?
I have already contacted slush, bu he has no real answer besides that it's random chance.
It's not, the payout has been stable over a period of a week, the averaging graph of payout is pretty horizontal, which means it's stable and averaged.
So, again, if anyone has an explanation...
Part of it is stale shares (about 1.6%).
Then maybe some commission.
But after that, i can't find any reason.
I'm mining @351MH/s and it's very consistent, no network drops or similar.
The graph on bitcoin7 shows this consistency, but it settles around 0.18BC .
The bitcoin calculatoirs predicts 0.21BC at current difficulty (1690906).
So, where does this difference come from and how do i get it back?
I have already contacted slush, bu he has no real answer besides that it's random chance.
It's not, the payout has been stable over a period of a week, the averaging graph of payout is pretty horizontal, which means it's stable and averaged.
So, again, if anyone has an explanation...
Slushes pool had bad luck, steady for most of the last week. His response to you was accurate: random chance. No pool, regardless of size is immune to luck.
August 01, 2011, 05:54:35 AM
Hi, I have problem with one of my miners recently.
I have two miners on same local network. Everything was ok until few days ago, since when minerd on my laptop cannot connect.
The other miner on the same network works fine:
I have also another two miners, each one in diferent datacenter working without problems.
I can't see any reasonable explanation.
And btw. I know that CPU mining on laptop is unprofitable I just can't wait for my 5970's
I have two miners on same local network. Everything was ok until few days ago, since when minerd on my laptop cannot connect.
Code:
[deafboy@deafboy-notas ~]$ minerd -a 4way -s 4 -t 2 --url http://api.bitcoin.cz:8332 --userpass deafboy.notas:XXXXXXXXXX
[2011-08-01 12:41:57] HTTP request failed: Empty reply from server
[2011-08-01 12:41:57] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
[2011-08-01 12:41:59] 2 miner threads started, using SHA256 '4way' algorithm.
[2011-08-01 12:42:27] HTTP request failed: Empty reply from server
[2011-08-01 12:42:27] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
[2011-08-01 12:41:57] HTTP request failed: Empty reply from server
[2011-08-01 12:41:57] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
[2011-08-01 12:41:59] 2 miner threads started, using SHA256 '4way' algorithm.
[2011-08-01 12:42:27] HTTP request failed: Empty reply from server
[2011-08-01 12:42:27] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
The other miner on the same network works fine:
Code:
deafboy@pathfinder:~$ minerd -a 4way -s 5 -t 4 --url http://api.bitcoin.cz:8332 --userpass deafboy.pathfinder:XXXXXXXXXX
[2011-08-01 12:47:26] 4 miner threads started, using SHA256 '4way' algorithm.
[2011-08-01 12:48:44] thread 0: 16777216 hashes, 204.66 khash/sec
[2011-08-01 12:48:46] thread 1: 16777216 hashes, 203.28 khash/sec
[2011-08-01 12:48:47] thread 2: 16777216 hashes, 202.53 khash/sec
[2011-08-01 12:48:48] thread 3: 16777216 hashes, 201.74 khash/sec
[2011-08-01 12:47:26] 4 miner threads started, using SHA256 '4way' algorithm.
[2011-08-01 12:48:44] thread 0: 16777216 hashes, 204.66 khash/sec
[2011-08-01 12:48:46] thread 1: 16777216 hashes, 203.28 khash/sec
[2011-08-01 12:48:47] thread 2: 16777216 hashes, 202.53 khash/sec
[2011-08-01 12:48:48] thread 3: 16777216 hashes, 201.74 khash/sec
I have also another two miners, each one in diferent datacenter working without problems.
I can't see any reasonable explanation.
And btw. I know that CPU mining on laptop is unprofitable I just can't wait for my 5970's
July 31, 2011, 02:04:04 PM
LOL the block that lasts 4hours 34minutes is invalid, my video cards worked hard for so long for nothing
now that makes my day even worse
July 31, 2011, 01:39:28 PM
LOL the block that lasts 4hours 34minutes is invalid, my video cards worked hard for so long for nothing
July 31, 2011, 06:07:38 AM
My reward on several rounds says 0.00000000. What does it mean? It can't be precious enough to show more decimals? Thanks.
July 31, 2011, 05:56:13 AM
I'm still having the problem that my payout seems about 14% lower than expected.
Part of it is stale shares (about 1.6%).
Then maybe some commission.
But after that, i can't find any reason.
I'm mining @351MH/s and it's very consistent, no network drops or similar.
The graph on bitcoin7 shows this consistency, but it settles around 0.18BC .
The bitcoin calculatoirs predicts 0.21BC at current difficulty (1690906).
So, where does this difference come from and how do i get it back?
I have already contacted slush, bu he has no real answer besides that it's random chance.
It's not, the payout has been stable over a period of a week, the averaging graph of payout is pretty horizontal, which means it's stable and averaged.
So, again, if anyone has an explanation...
Part of it is stale shares (about 1.6%).
Then maybe some commission.
But after that, i can't find any reason.
I'm mining @351MH/s and it's very consistent, no network drops or similar.
The graph on bitcoin7 shows this consistency, but it settles around 0.18BC .
The bitcoin calculatoirs predicts 0.21BC at current difficulty (1690906).
So, where does this difference come from and how do i get it back?
I have already contacted slush, bu he has no real answer besides that it's random chance.
It's not, the payout has been stable over a period of a week, the averaging graph of payout is pretty horizontal, which means it's stable and averaged.
So, again, if anyone has an explanation...
July 31, 2011, 01:49:28 AM
should i get less reward using two workers versus one about swear this is the case
i think you get more reward with more workers. when i used 1 worker i would get .002 then i switched to 6 workers i got .005 
July 31, 2011, 01:34:21 AM
should i get less reward using two workers versus one about swear this is the case
--edit
i mean avg per reward seems lower with two gpus versus one
--edit
i mean avg per reward seems lower with two gpus versus one
July 30, 2011, 11:10:51 PM
Or you could just lower the threshold to your current balance?
0.1 is the lowest I think. If I stop mining anything below that won't be sent to me. Not much, but every little thing counts. I'm working on the upgrade. Soon payouts will not be limited to two decimal digits
July 30, 2011, 04:41:29 PM
Or you could just lower the threshold to your current balance?
0.1 is the lowest I think. If I stop mining anything below that won't be sent to me. Not much, but every little thing counts. I'm working on the upgrade. Soon payouts will not be limited to two decimal digits
If you're changing things, perhaps the option to have the full balance paid out if no shares have been submitted in X days?
July 30, 2011, 04:36:04 PM
Or you could just lower the threshold to your current balance?
0.1 is the lowest I think. If I stop mining anything below that won't be sent to me. Not much, but every little thing counts. I'm working on the upgrade. Soon payouts will not be limited to two decimal digits
July 30, 2011, 04:32:23 PM
Or you could just lower the threshold to your current balance?
0.1 is the lowest I think. If I stop mining anything below that won't be sent to me. Not much, but every little thing counts. July 30, 2011, 04:17:46 PM
Or you could just lower the threshold to your current balance?
July 30, 2011, 03:40:12 PM
That other pool pays out the full amount after 7 days of inactivity, so I can mine a little every now and then and when I get tired of it I'll all come to me and I won't have to do anything. I have a few btc in another pool that I can't get out because it's too small. I like this pool but I don't want to leave the few bitcents I'll manage to scrape together here because I didn't manage to get up to some threshold.
July 30, 2011, 03:26:23 PM
July 30, 2011, 03:22:21 PM
We got a 9 second block!
And I managed to get a share or two there. Sweet sweet 0.03 BTC. July 30, 2011, 03:16:30 PM
We got a 9 second block!
And I managed to get a share or two there. Sweet sweet 0.03 BTC. Very sweet. 0.03503616
Jump to: