We should not be so closed to just having a unique look at a certain option, in something that only really manages our funds, because in practical reality it is mobile or hardware, security always depends on us, nobody else.
If you have many BTC , so make a distribution of funds on several devices, please, do not put all the eggs in a "mobile" sorry a basket.
The above seems like a cliche, but it is the reason to say that I use both options.
True, if you are not encountering any problems on a device, it's doesn't mean it will keep you safe forever from hackers.
Any thing doesn't guarantee everything. Have you heard mobile wallets saying we are unbreachable? instead they are saying " we are secured platform blah blah . . ." and these two are different.
I must agree that most of mobile wallets are secured, it has an encryption from our technology which makes it harder to breach, but always remember that there is no safe system. Even bitcoin's algo can break by supercomputers.
The point into this, we shouldn't share something biased statements because we all knew that the mobile wallet isn't the practical wallet. This kind of thinking is not applicable in choosing devices but in general, be practical and choose those things that will benefit you a lot and has more assurance.
Well for me using a mobile wallet is practical, what is not for me is buying a hardware wallet but for some they do coz they want a fully secured wallet. Still at the end of the day, it is you that keeps your own money.