Anti-martingale is worst than martin gale itself! Just to illustrate
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Lose - -8 units
Result: -1 units
Another example,
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Win - +8 units
5. Win - +16 units
6. Win - +32 units
7. Lose - -64 units
Result: -1 units
In the event you lose, you'll always have -1 units.
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Lose - -8 units
Result: -1 units
Another example,
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Win - +8 units
5. Win - +16 units
6. Win - +32 units
7. Lose - -64 units
Result: -1 units
In the event you lose, you'll always have -1 units.
Well it is indeed a anti-martingale, since in martin gale you get about 1 unit when you win out of a long losing streak every time.
What's nice about this style is that if he does win 7 in a row, then he will profit by a lot! That's the only beauty of this.
Yeah, But it is very risky once he hit lose 7 in a row first then his balance was emptied. Hahaha. This strategy is only advisable for those who didn't drink much coffee or any hearth attack sickness. Martingale is a risky method and anti martingale is more riskier, All newly invented strategy gets riskier. I still prefer the traditional way of betting where I choose random roll.
YEah this is a risky strat and if he hits 7 loses in a row that would be the end of his bankroll but then again. If you are brave enough and don't afraid of losing maybe this strategy is for you.
