Firstly they were trained and supplied arms to the Americans. Why did they not flee to America , and in Europe?
Neither the US, not the EU was involved in the initial phase of the Syrian war. The Sunni Arab countries such as Saudi Arabia and Kuwait were the one who started this conflict. And they must be the ones who should house these people.
USA played their part, they didn't "start" the war
But they armed ISIS
Which is enough to blame them
And do you understand that only 1 million migrants came last year? Even if they were ALL active muslims (which is not the case) it would still make not even 0.4% of European population... How do you go from 5% to 30% with 1 million of migrants? Even with 10 millions for god sake!!!
http://www.ibtimes.com/europes-refugee-crisis-germany-registered-over-1-million-asylum-seekers-2015-2251590
In 2015, Germany received 1.1 million asylum applications from Muslim immigrants. Out of this, 430,000 were from Syria, 154,046 were from Afghanistan and 121,662 were from Iraq. 80% of the applications were made by single men. After family re-unification, we can expect this 1 million to climb to 6 to 8 million.
Total population of Germany is 80 million. That is 10% increase in Muslim population in a single year. It is obvious to everyone, with the exception of retards.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34131911
Of course it's already a lot, I'm not claiming Germany isn't doing its part and France should take a fucking example on that.
But no it's not an invasion, you're not going to reach 94millions of Germans in 2 or 3 years just because of migrants, only a retard would believe that
It's still too much
I met a German guy recently who's planning to buy a house here in Croatia (Istria) because he thinks Germany will become a khalifat
Let's not debate if it has any basis on actual facts, but this policy is driving Germans away from Germany and driving in foreigners
I mean, if we neglect this
Taking adult males capable of fightning away from Syria (if they're not ISIS supporters, which they apparently aren't since we're giving them asylum in EU) is helping ISIS
We're taking away those who need to fight against them, and pay them food,shelter, transport, social support etc.
Isn't it cheaper to buy them AK47s?
And won't it be more helpful long term to give weapons to those who FIGHT instead of to feed, store and move around a bunch of people with a literally no positive long term effect except for keeping them alive (and killing their countryman along the way, since all the war capable men went to Sweden).
