Hi,
From an initial review it seems this user is creating multiple accounts to abuse the freebies, and therefore probably tripped up some of the automated multiple account checks. It seems quite obvious, because they used sequential email addresses - almost identical nicknames and so on. Very obvious.
The support team do not usually prioritize responding to obvious multiple account freebie abusers - we get hundreds a day. The team focuses on genuine players - and always will.
Thank you for coming here upon an invitation through email.
the usual answer they write
multiple accounts and automatic bot
no point in continuing
My only consolation is that I have never deposited a cent on this site and I hope no one will.
thanks to everyone on the forum for the help
That's... it?
Though I also have to say that I am not surprised as more likely than not, this is what happened with scam accusations against casinos here, I'll have to say that I am surprised with your response. After the exhaustive attempt done to get them to explain, your response to their rebuttal is basically, "LOL, right. Let's move on."
The direction of the latest narrative is a table turner. Even with their lack of counter-evidence, their answer [and especially your response] somewhat fits a logical thinking. I've been wondering about the why you made a lot of effort for 80 USDC, not only in sense of creating a scam accusation here, but also from the earliest narrative about putting an effort to reach minimum WD and only WD that amount [not depositing to play, won some, and withdraw a larger sum, or other scenario]. I didn't voice that question, as I am well understand that money is a very subjective matter.
With this, though, it kinda make sense. The effort to get minimum WD, the blocked verification after several attempt, and, again, especially, your response to drop it, as I think someone innocent will pursue this, if not for the amount it'll be for the effort put on this whole thread.
So, unless you have something else to say, I am led to believe that their side of story is the truth here. And thus, even without supporting evidence from their side, I'll mark this as resolved on my list instead of other status.