I don't see where you answered my question.
What I am concerned about is this. Let's say Dash starts to become more popular and widely used. To the point where journalists and regulators look at it possibly. So as it getting more attention by this stage, people begin to ask about the early launch, and Evan at that point get's asked about it.
That could IMHO lead to problems
You claim the imperfect launch is going to get Dash into trouble? Why?
No, I said it might be a problem. Which is why I am trying ascertain whether Evan ever explained it
For what reason? Why the fuck would that have any impact? The only thing that's worth a damn is whether the proposed features work or not.
People might not like the idea that Evan appeared to have misled people. IIUC, he told people he would launch at a certain time, but then launched it earlier, and during that time a massive amount of coins were mined.
It just could look bad and make people or regulators avoid Dash, if the project ever starts to take off.
If the proposed features are open source then anyone can copy them, so that may not be such a huge advantage.