So how exactly am I wrong if I simply described what everyone can observe? I am not wrong but you are in denial of reality by comparing useful metal with useless virtual coins.
Gold is bad for use in jewelry. In electronics it has been used for the last 50 years and only 7% of the gold ends up there and in your opinion this has given it value for the last 2500 years? Being a poor raw material for jewelry made it the strongest asset of the last 2,500 years? NO! gold's use cases does not determine its value. They're like oregano on pizza. You're full of pizza, not oregano.The desire to have something expensive and rare that holds value. This makes people want to have gold. This gives it value. It's not me who ignores reality. You are the one who claims that gold is valued by using it in electronics, which defies logic, and you do it only to justify your erroneous views.
gold previously had the function of money, but this was taken away by central banks. Even this did not destroy gold as an great asset
"desire to have something expensive and rare that holds value" Bitcoin has all these characteristics