Superstition is just a coincidence with the true outcome. If a gambler is superstitious and have won, then it is his /her luck that have brought the win. But superstitious people never find it out of luck, and when lost they don't connect with the superstition for which they term it to be bad luck.
A gambler losses/wins out of luck, and at times the strategy used to be successful and at times it brings success. Whenever one is in the winning streak it is good to continue it, and take a break when you're on the losing streak.
Topic: A superstitious strategy? - page 6. (Read 584 times)
To be lucky is not about your gambling strategy because you were also having such strategy while losing, so they are both different things. Winning should tell you that luck is on your side and so I would prefer to continue playing when I'm winning and the superstition is that when you start losing, luck probably have left you. I think these are the possibilities in gambling but to have is not a probability based on strategy.
For me i believe gambling has everything to do with luck and am speaking from experience, because even with all the greatest strategies one can apply for gambling, it will still bore down to one major factor which is luck. As for superstitious believes, i have come across so many in my area that actually believe luck as a whole can be drawn or channel when gambling through the use of vudo magics and incantations . Well i guess you can't actually stop anyone from believing what he or she wants to believe especially when they say its works for them.
The problem is, you don't know when the wind is going to favor your side. For example, the winning spin (in slots) can be on the 1st, 10th, or 1,000th spin. If after 100 spins you accumulated loss and then quit, it may or may not be a good decision depending on the future result. It could be that you'll get a max-win on the next 100 spins that will make a lot of profit. A similar thing also happens in dice when you search for a high multiplier, low winning chance bet. Moreover, the feeling of "it's my lucky day" sometimes is not accurate and it will turn into "a bad day" if you continue to play with this martingale strategy.
If you like martingale, however, I think reverse martingale or paroli is more suitable if you want to bet on your good streak.
If you like martingale, however, I think reverse martingale or paroli is more suitable if you want to bet on your good streak.
Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?
You'll never know if you're lucky if you don't play. So either way you'll be playing at some point, though I won't call it a strategy as there's no strategy in luck but rather testing the waters. A good strategy is stop playing after you have a profit, take a break and enjoy your winning. Then play again the other day as playing again at the same day would definitely increase your risk in losing. After all, the longer you play the higher the risk you'll be losing.
Well as a gamblers there are a lot of superstitions that we believed, I even see someone like holding some amulet or something when they go and play slots, lol. Nevertheless gambling is still based on luck, perhaps we just want to find ways to explain our losing and winning and we blame it all on some belief, specially some higher UP that might change the course of the game in our favor. And so if you feel that you are unlucky then you should stop so that their will be no more bleeding and play the next day and test again.
But luck and strategy is a different things, right? Strategy is like a plan you've prepared and you're going to use in gambling while luck is something like a force or event that we don't know when will it come and if it's good or bad. You can't control luck while strategy can. They are both important but plays a different role.
Good gamblers must know that "there is not real luck" but on only statistics / math rule that can be applied on your gambling games.
Ok maybe there are some times when you feel to be "lucky" and you're winning more of the "normal" chance, but you cannot real take advantage on this since it's just based on casualty. Not more, not less.
For sure applying martingale is a destructive option for bet, " you will loss more trying to recover your previous loss".
Ok maybe there are some times when you feel to be "lucky" and you're winning more of the "normal" chance, but you cannot real take advantage on this since it's just based on casualty. Not more, not less.
For sure applying martingale is a destructive option for bet, " you will loss more trying to recover your previous loss".
Most gamblers must have went through this, sometimes luck appears to be your side specially in games like casino war or dice.
Today, morning I was playing casino war, I just use martingale - I know it's lame strategy. But I won most of time.
Then later at noon, luck just didn't appear to be on my side. A constant losses with win every once in a while to recoup the losses and then losing streak, all funds gone.
Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?
Today, morning I was playing casino war, I just use martingale - I know it's lame strategy. But I won most of time.
Then later at noon, luck just didn't appear to be on my side. A constant losses with win every once in a while to recoup the losses and then losing streak, all funds gone.
Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?
Jump to: