Topic: A tale of the two parasites (Read 382 times)

For sure having intense and selfish desires for wealth has been causing a lot of people to do things that are really unimaginable. This is really bad because most of all those rich people are in control in government, that's why most countries these days hardly move forward economically.

It is because of all these parasites that are always taking from the country and not giving back, and always doing things that are only going to satisfy their selfish needs. Well, there’s not going to be a world without these people, so they are always going to be around. But we should always do our best to get rid of them whenever possible.

No much point of argument via justifying the Rich, because from my perception, the richest add value to the society and also add values to the poor category of people, the only thing we should emphasize on, is the characteristics of them accordingly, but we are not meant to generalized all richest that their character towards contributing to benefit of the country or another is questionable or abnormal, it depends, the category set of rich caliber's that depends in political finance and those groups can't add value to the country, because what comes to their minds is idealogy of embezzlement of funds.

So my observations, the parasite rich category is very harmful to the people than the parasite set of the poor category, because it's very obvious and quiet understandable that the poor does not cause a commotion to a domain or to the country rather they embrace peace and also make the life of mankind especially those who fall into category of rich to live easier live by rendering service to them through skill, trade and so numerous to be mention.

Some of the rich parasites add value to the country directly and indirectly, i can equally say that they render value through setting up infrastructure's and hire different participants to engage in the function in order to reduce the level of crime to the society, while some of them embrace the methods of embezzlement and get out away with it in order to put people in pain, that's the reason i said we have positive parasite and negative parasite, just that their characters define them individually.

rich parasites will become very terrible wolves, it can happen that they are desperate to buy government regulations to carry out their actions so that their greed appears, and finally oppress the poor parasites. After the small parasites are suppressed, they do whatever it takes to fulfill their needs, and not infrequently the criminal path is taken

compared to calling it abnormal I prefer to call it natural selection and a fact that must be accepted.
because indeed when we start to be born and start to live the longer the competition becomes more obvious by being distinguished by the words the rich and the poor.
and this will not be able to change as long as the person who runs it is the one who can change this.
regardless of anything natural selection has existed since we were born and like it or not we have to follow the rules that already exist today even though these are not clearly written rules.
This competition and classification of people is what makes this happen, so it will be very difficult to change the situation, especially for those who are labeled as poor.
they have to work extra to change their circumstances to be better in life, they must be required to survive in all forms of life's challenges

This two class of parasites are very dangerous to society, it's growth and development, it's security level because they do more harm than good since they don't exactly contribute positively to the growth of the society,
I think the rich parasites are the most annoying thinking everything are above the laws, always looking for a way to manipulate the system to bend to their demands, the poor parasites are almost like a toothless bulldog, can't do much because of their poor financial status.

I think it is not abnormal but the reality and outcome of life. The rich get richer and the poor is made poorer syndrome is because of the access to power and economic resources. Example the rich person is likely to have rich friends whom he can get loan from to execute a business idea that will further enrich him or he is connected in government but the poor is likely not going to see his or her dream through or may "die" with the idea. If you have read Animal Farm by George Orwell, you can understand more why some human beings can always be there either because of family tree and history. Also , Rich Dad Poor Dad by Robert kiyosaki will teach some of the reasons more. Only a few hand full of the poor may find their way up the rope of wealth and richest especially with the cryptocurrency innovation where just hodling a few btc is worth a fortune.


No they are not the only but the rich is connected and either someone in the government or friend to friends in high places that can get them off the hook faster than you know or before it gets to public eyes. Files, calls and bribes are taken for it not to be below out to public. Common... They drink over such in round table. Such an unfair situation.


Stealing is in the genealogy, can be adopted from others like friends. The stealing is not exclusive to the poor because the rich steal with the pen. Therefore, it is just the mode of stealing that may be different.

That's very abnormal. The rich get richer, the poor go to prison. Poor people often commit crimes, Rich people will be more famous.

Poor people are more often victims of crime because there are no security facilities. They will suffer more and more because of the greed of the rich who want to increase their wealth. Rich people can do whatever they want because they can afford everything including security and power.

Poor people turn into parasites (harming others) because of the difficult demands of life, They steal to survive. The poor steal because they can't hold their hunger, while the rich steal by oppressing the poor because they want to increase their wealth.

That's not the root of the problem. Why do there exist poor people? Because this is the society we create. Some people don't have access on education, some people have mental problems that are ignored and sometimes it's stigma to go and visit psychiatrist, some people have stupid parents who born and born new babies while starving. The root of all of these is the lack of education and it may sound rough but the easy acceptance of asylum seekers. The Europe is very liberal, gives Asylum to those who can't bring any benefit to the country and to whose who are really poor parasites but those who can trul bring success and benefit to the country, find it very hard to get the citizens of Europe (You have to come with funds that will be enough to keep you alive in Europe: money for rent and food, then you have to pay some tution fees, but that's really cheap in Norway/Germany, you have to study for 4 years, then you are given some time to find a job with your profession and after that you can apply for Permanent Residence and then comes the citizenship which is still hard to get for these people while Asylum Seeker from poor and full of war countries, who have no manners, no knowledge and are pure criminals, are easily given citizenship.

It is something the same with the parisite movie which the wealthy one is helping thos people in need by providing them jobs but instead they got greedy which they recommend their whole family in his job without knowing by their boss. The idea was really good but it makes you greedy in money and also wealth that could make people devilish

when we talk about this, we are actually aware of it or not, we are still living with a system that uses natural laws where indeed everyone uses all kinds of ways to make them prosperous regardless of other people.
and indeed parasites like this will never disappear forever because it is in accordance with the law of the jungle that I said, because indeed they are the perpetrators who do things like they think when they don't do what they are doing now they will lose everything they have.
because their principle still holds that whoever is strong will survive in life.
and indeed things like this we will not be able to finish when we still cannot be free from what is called greed and avarice.

It would be unwise to say that all poor people are parasites, because as you said anyone can be a parasite including the rich. Sometimes I see some
poor people trying to do everything they can to provide for themselves and their families. Even though the business or work that poor people do
makes very little money, it is important that they do it the right way. So if we see many poor people who beg on the street hoping for help from others,
we must remember that not all poor people do that. I am indeed more annoyed with people who already have large incomes, but because of their
greed they commit corruption, it is a real parasite.

This is part of my point that some rich people also do make value to the poor when they have provided them with jobs either directly or through the contacts that they have with their friends Value is created even when you provide food or shelter only because by that time you have provided immediate needs for the poor and the household. Food, shelter are part of value , it gives life and only the living can acquire other values that are futuristic.

what you say is true, poor people are not parasites and anyone can become a parasite. Those who only take advantage for themselves without benefiting others are parasites or parasites that must be exterminated.
in the business of such parasitic traits will make others uncomfortable and only burdened with no significant profit.
government is also a big parasite that lives on everyone including the poor and rich and those who are proven to be corrupt are the type of parasites that are no longer good.

Not all the poor are parasites as well as the rich. Very often poor people are poor because they just do not have opportunity to find another but some low paid work. There are also a lot of good people among the rich, who have their huge businesses and give a lot of money on charity, on increased scholarships for promising children, etc. I'm not a racist, but in fact real parasites are all those afro-economical-migrants that secretly sneak into The European Union, do nothing, do not want to work at all but live off financial benefits from government.

I might say that the government officials/politicians might have something to do with these two types of people because of their corrupted leading management. But if you read the definition of these two, they aren't really giving something back to the economy in which they were likely a parasites that enjoying what they could get to the society but never bother to give back in return to the society.

And that's a toxic kind of traits for someone to develop, I despise those kind of people they were the most dirtiest people you would not want to work with.

Of course the government is the biggest issue here, because they are the common element between rich and poor parasites. There are only parasites from both species because there is a corrupt government behind feeding them with the taxes paid by another citizens.

The analogy works perfectly if you highlight the government's participation on the scheme, but it's inaccurate to label riches as parasites just because they don't want to pay taxes to feed the real parasites (the government and the ones patronized by them, being them rich or poor).

This is the reason why the divide between the poor and the rich blurs even more today than in the past, and not for the better. The ones most affected are the people who are not rich but are not poor either, those who are able to live stable, well-off lives. They are left to of course care for the sentiments of the poor but at the same time under the rich parasite's tyrannical hold. What can we do about it? provide help and information when needed, and stop nourishing the leeches of the society basically. This is what I am saying. The economic divide between the rich and the poor is becoming more and more unrecognizable, which is good if not for the fact that it's the middle class that's becoming more poor and the rich are able to enjoy the luxury of life. The stagnation in economic growth, couple that with the ever-existing graft and corruption from each government, makes living very hard for the poor and the middle class while so advantageous for the elite.

Wealthy people always live in a prosperous way in society they are not parasites the poor live like parasites like the rich do not improve their normal life journey the biggest victims are the poor people many of whom ‘eat day by day. This stagnation has also had a major negative impact on people whose incomes are slightly above the poverty line but because the economic base is fragile these people are helpless, they can be catastrophic in any disaster or economic crisis.

Even if we don't like to call them parasites, there will be people calling them that way or have another term that has the same meaning. Those people that are born with a golden spoon, don't have to think about struggles because they're all set until they grow old with their inheritance from their rich parents. While for those people that are unfortunately born in a poor family, it's not their problem if they've been born in that family and as the known saying about dying poor, it's their fault if they end up being in that status.

I don't like calling anyone parasite. It is based on the simple definition that everyone must contribute to someone else in society, otherwise he is a parasite. That is a communist way of thinking.

Many people born in rich family, they have plenty of resource that can support them for generations, they don't need to contribute to society, and it is a blessing if they don't start a war against another country just because their benefits are hurt

Many people born in poor family, they have no chance to get a good education or job to support themselves, they end up receiving social benefits, it is a blessing if they don't go on street and rob other people