Pages:
Author

Topic: A true Martingale system for sports ;D (Read 1634 times)

legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
February 08, 2016, 12:14:30 PM
#48
Oh come on.....

Looks easy written down doesn't it, in reality however you're unlikely to be able to achieve this. One result is always going to kick you in the nuts.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Me, myself and I
February 08, 2016, 11:58:17 AM
#47
i would choice parlay bet than bet using martingale method and i would place a bet single bet from every match i select on parlay bets. for me this more better than using martingale because you will not get blow from 1 match and isn't make you lose all your money instantly only in 90 minutes " if you bet on football/soccer"
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 2198
I stand with Ukraine.
February 08, 2016, 11:52:52 AM
#46
Although I'm not into sports betting I think that martingale is always a martingale. You might lose a lot betting like this, but you might win also if you are lucky. What I personally don't like in martingale is that if you win you get a much smaller amount than you might lose.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
February 08, 2016, 11:48:46 AM
#45
i had used this Martingale system for playing a dice some times ago but this strategy is not working for me and actually i was never thought martingale can use for sport betting but i think use martingale for sport betting have very high risk especially for huge amount bets and i consider that using usual bets is more safe than use this strategy

Well at least here's someone who can attest of having used Martingale for some time and we can have some proofs that it doesn't actually work. I thought Martingale was better suited for sports but I guess I was wrong and it's basically the same as I mentioned earlier as in regular gambling. The house always gets you and in sports is no different, the odds are placed by the bookmakers so they will always have that advantage in the long term.

Don't wait for experience to let you know how it works, do the math and figure it out.

The problem with waiting for the experience is that it works every time, until it doesn't, and then you are fucked.

For a fun math problem, calculate the odds of winning 20 in a row and the odds of losing 20 in a row on your favorite dice site/whatever. then look at how much you win using martingale and how much you lose and see why it's such a bad idea.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1000
February 08, 2016, 11:19:48 AM
#44
i had used this Martingale system for playing a dice some times ago but this strategy is not working for me and actually i was never thought martingale can use for sport betting but i think use martingale for sport betting have very high risk especially for huge amount bets and i consider that using usual bets is more safe than use this strategy

Well at least here's someone who can attest of having used Martingale for some time and we can have some proofs that it doesn't actually work. I thought Martingale was better suited for sports but I guess I was wrong and it's basically the same as I mentioned earlier as in regular gambling. The house always gets you and in sports is no different, the odds are placed by the bookmakers so they will always have that advantage in the long term.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1006
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
February 08, 2016, 10:37:54 AM
#43
i had used this Martingale system for playing a dice some times ago but this strategy is not working for me and actually i was never thought martingale can use for sport betting but i think use martingale for sport betting have very high risk especially for huge amount bets and i consider that using usual bets is more safe than use this strategy
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
February 08, 2016, 07:49:32 AM
#42
I see we have not understood each other, I know Chelsea have lost many of their matches this season, but have they lost 8 consecutive games playing at home ? I think no although not sure.

For those who thing this is a big bankroll, can start out little by little not from 0.01 BTC, but from 0.001 BTC this way more chances of trying this method, but this one needs a lot of patience, that rarely is to be found on gamblers. Cool

And the odds on their next home game are 1.48. How much are you going to bet? What happens to your system if they choke in that game?
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
February 08, 2016, 07:08:15 AM
#41
Martingale alone is not good enough to call it reliable system. Trying to  incorporate it in sports bets its even stranger idea imo.
I don't see any potential application in sportsbetting as variables of sports betting are even more martingale unfriendly than while playing Dice.
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1001
February 08, 2016, 06:24:43 AM
#40
No infinite bankroll =  no martingale...
Many people believed like that, martingale only works on infinite bankroll which it's means the strategy would not work at all in the end.
So do I, no matter what kind games you gambled , using martingale needed a very large bankroll with very low base bet.
copper member
Activity: 1442
Merit: 529
February 08, 2016, 03:54:25 AM
#39
Wow i never see a girl like sports betting. I think martingale system is good for sports. It's not like dice who have provably fair. and on sports it's really fair.

And you haven't seen enough. Today I think making my premier start with a girly tipster thread Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
February 08, 2016, 03:53:44 AM
#38
Wow i never see a girl like sports betting. I think martingale system is good for sports. It's not like dice who have provably fair. and on sports it's really fair.
full member
Activity: 180
Merit: 100
February 08, 2016, 03:37:52 AM
#37
No infinite bankroll =  no martingale...
copper member
Activity: 1442
Merit: 529
February 08, 2016, 03:10:44 AM
#36
I see we have not understood each other, I know Chelsea have lost many of their matches this season, but have they lost 8 consecutive games playing at home ? I think no although not sure.

For those who thing this is a big bankroll, can start out little by little not from 0.01 BTC, but from 0.001 BTC this way more chances of trying this method, but this one needs a lot of patience, that rarely is to be found on gamblers. Cool
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1000
February 08, 2016, 01:55:35 AM
#35
Martingale strategy is a fail system.You cant win in long-term with martingale strategy.
Is very hard to make money with gambling.

It is not fail though, you just need to set your balance and your bet amount well to get some good profit. Without make a good setting on these I believe there is no one could make good outcome
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
February 07, 2016, 11:09:18 PM
#34
It's probably not going to work as the odds of betting on dice are almost the same. It seems like a decent idea if you are into sports and watch alot of it, so the odds might be slightly in your favour. If anyone plans on doing this, good luck to you!
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
February 07, 2016, 11:08:33 PM
#33
I think Martingale works a lot more well in sports betting than in real life. But seriously nothing is guaranteed and anyone can bust easily over this method.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
February 07, 2016, 11:06:14 PM
#32
Hmzz, your ideas very interesting and pretty good. But it was all not everything will work out well, because sometimes these predictions make a great defeat, I also think, sometimes a team that not entered the top 10 in the standings will win by a team that entered the top 10. Because they also have the passion to become a champion in a match. So your idea is less precise.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
February 07, 2016, 10:53:09 PM
#31
Increasing it by *2 seems to be a thing for those with big bankrolls. Also, there aren't sure profits to be gained in a sports bet. This is one method to lose your money fast than any other gambling methods there is. If it works for you then great, but most of the time it wouldn't.

From calculation perspective it looks good but in reality very difficult to get always winning team odds more than 2 or at least 2 or one may need to wait very very long time to get this done. In my opinion this concept will not work in sports. If you want to make money in sports than don't really look to double your money immediately instead looks for the most probable winning team to bet.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
February 07, 2016, 09:26:02 PM
#30
Seems to be a nice model to be applied to sports trading.

Perfect to be used in a soccer match where a week team plays at home with a strong team Wink
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 252
February 07, 2016, 07:09:41 PM
#29
it's really hard to achieve 8 winning streak with X2 odds or more
in my opinion players should use the normal marinagle in sports betting , no need to keep doubling when you win cause it's so hard to achieve 8 streak
but at the end it's all about the experience , if you found it good then go for it

It seems to me you have misunderstood her plan. She was suggesting people to "double the bet size until they win" rather than "double the bet size when they win", so it is pretty much the normal martingale.

ahh I thought she was suggesting to double the bet when you win till you achieve that amount
so basically this is just martinagle , not A True Martinagle System  Grin

Same here!

Which means I don't understand really the point of the post. It's just a martingale system!
Not bad hey, but just extremely classical ^^
Pages:
Jump to: