You are using sometimes Web3 and sometimes Web 3.0. But there are huge difference between Web3 and Web 3.0. So it would be better to decide about what do you talking are?
But the same time if someone wants marketing promotion he can use both Web3 and Web 3.0 and i don`t think that lots of people will think that he is cheating them.
Topic: A way to attract new users or a misunderstanding? - page 17. (Read 10225 times)
Crypto newbies can get confused with the web 3 implementation on gambling platforms , thinking the experience will be different but later they will realize that it's still the same old online gambling ways, nothing new, they will learn their lessons.
There are so many new crypto project that attached Web 3 and Metaverse to their name, it's all for the advertising sake, most won't deliver anything new and some will leave the aim half way.
There are so many new crypto project that attached Web 3 and Metaverse to their name, it's all for the advertising sake, most won't deliver anything new and some will leave the aim half way.
Most likely when we hear web3 casinos, for me it sounds like a new era of gambling, until we start to experience that certain casinos and end up being disappointed. It’s still the same with the usuals casinos asking for KYC, nothing is really new. I guess the term web3 is just put and being associated in the names of the casinos just to attract new users and become tempted to play. Yes, this is more of a false advertisement which I think any casino that is doing that should be given a red flag and negative feedback so they can also learn their lesson.
There's nothing new just exactly as you've made mention when it comes to gambling casinos stating they are incorporating a web3 gambling website, it makes no any different from the ones we have in existence before and web3 has nothing to do with stopping them from demanding for KYC at the end, we know it's part of a marketing strategy adopted to captivate gamblers where as some may also come in claiming theirs is 3D or HD graphics casino or betting site which mean thesame thing as a marketing strategy or repackaging.
Are any of those who named them Web 3.0 gambling successful? I think they might need a user identity for something, yes this is just a caution to you. having to be decentralized is more of a thing and it should have no KYC at all.
Dunno if there are even one that succeed in this web 3.0 thing about gambling but what I only knew that this is not truly a good thing for gambling public, there are even many that uses this to attract players but the truth is they don't really have.Are any of those who named them Web 3.0 gambling successful? I think they might need a user identity for something, yes this is just a caution to you. having to be decentralized is more of a thing and it should have no KYC at all.
^ I think there is, https://www.esports.net/news/top-3-blockchain-gaming-platforms/.Here in the forum if I am not mistaken, Gandom casino is also a web3 casino.
Because once the casino is licensed and regulated it is expected that the casino will ask for KYC from their user and right, this web3 is just marketing ads that mislead new gambler thing web3 is a fully decentralized casino. However, some of them, have dApp that does not really ask for KYC and probably there is but only minor information such as the mobile number and email address.
Are any of those who named them Web 3.0 gambling successful? I think they might need a user identity for something, yes this is just a caution to you. having to be decentralized is more of a thing and it should have no KYC at all.
Owl Games which has been running for almost 1 year and is still running. They use web 3.0 casino and require KYC for specific purposes according to the rules of the casino.The use of web 3.0 in a casino depends on the casino owner. Although the main function of web 3.0 is not like that. This is just a marketing strategy to attract players' attention, but in reality players still have to provide their identity. I think players should have some understanding of web 3.0.
Nothing in this world comes for free.
As the saying goes, it shows that marketers will do anything to market their products and sell it to the targeted audience for some value. When we talk about gambling, I don't think that too many sites ask for KYC verification until and unless deemed necessary.
While some casinos intentionally do it to stop the winner take their huge winnings out, there are also some casinos who really comply with the regulations of the jurisdiction they're holding their businesses at.
The web 3.0 was a nice way to market their services to everyone but when btc isn't decentralised itself, don't expect these cheap scripts (many casinos copy the same script) to provide you with such an important solution.
As the saying goes, it shows that marketers will do anything to market their products and sell it to the targeted audience for some value. When we talk about gambling, I don't think that too many sites ask for KYC verification until and unless deemed necessary.
While some casinos intentionally do it to stop the winner take their huge winnings out, there are also some casinos who really comply with the regulations of the jurisdiction they're holding their businesses at.
The web 3.0 was a nice way to market their services to everyone but when btc isn't decentralised itself, don't expect these cheap scripts (many casinos copy the same script) to provide you with such an important solution.
Are any of those who named them Web 3.0 gambling successful? I think they might need a user identity for something, yes this is just a caution to you. having to be decentralized is more of a thing and it should have no KYC at all.
And that how it should be but still asking out those KYC which does simply means that they arent running that 3.0 in the first place but rather they are really just deceiving out people that they are like thatbut we know that community wouldnt really be dumb as fuck on not to be able to make out differentiation in between web3 into those common centralized casinos or platforms that we do have today.
It is really just trying to make use of that word but cant eventually be able to apply since it wasnt really like that in the beginning.If they are really that making in use of those words
or claims just to hook up people and find out later on about the truth then i wont be shocked that they wouldnt really be getting any users far on ahead.
Maybe a sort of and some of it maybe also trying to comply with certain regulation.
But for now since this web 3.0 thing is famous word I believe this is just pure marketing strat by casino to attach it on their name so that many people would be curious to know what really into the web 3 especially on casino.
We should try not to get with this and only see those reputable casino implement since if smaller ones will just use it without any changes happen to their casino maybe they are just trying to bait and want to deceive people.
Are any of those who named them Web 3.0 gambling successful? I think they might need a user identity for something, yes this is just a caution to you. having to be decentralized is more of a thing and it should have no KYC at all.
And that how it should be but still asking out those KYC which does simply means that they arent running that 3.0 in the first place but rather they are really just deceiving out people that they are like thatbut we know that community wouldnt really be dumb as fuck on not to be able to make out differentiation in between web3 into those common centralized casinos or platforms that we do have today.
It is really just trying to make use of that word but cant eventually be able to apply since it wasnt really like that in the beginning.If they are really that making in use of those words
or claims just to hook up people and find out later on about the truth then i wont be shocked that they wouldnt really be getting any users far on ahead.
Are any of those who named them Web 3.0 gambling successful? I think they might need a user identity for something, yes this is just a caution to you. having to be decentralized is more of a thing and it should have no KYC at all.
And that how it should be but still asking out those KYC which does simply means that they arent running that 3.0 in the first place but rather they are really just deceiving out people that they are like thatbut we know that community wouldnt really be dumb as fuck on not to be able to make out differentiation in between web3 into those common centralized casinos or platforms that we do have today.
It is really just trying to make use of that word but cant eventually be able to apply since it wasnt really like that in the beginning.If they are really that making in use of those words
or claims just to hook up people and find out later on about the truth then i wont be shocked that they wouldnt really be getting any users far on ahead.
Not because a casino is running in a web3 means it shouldn't be centralized. web3 is supposed to be decentralized because it was the original plan but just like blockchain technology that has both centralized and decentralized categories, I believe web 3 will have the same. Please take note, web 3.0 and web3 are two different version. Web3 is an alternative branch wherein it runs in blockchain technology while web 3.0 as stated in the earlier reply as an upgrade of web 2.0 which have a more advanced function.
I do not think it is an issue if a casino is running in web3 and ask for KYC since the most casino isn't decentralized anyway. They have a central operation team, and all activities are centralized and governed by the company heads and staff. It is also isn't a lie when a casino advertises that they are running in web3 but are still centralized in all aspects as long as they don't say they are a decentralized entity. So I don't ever think a web3 casino asking for KYC is a red tag as long as the casino is licensed by the authority, they are subject to regulation and law. As a matter of fact, I find it green.
Are any of those who named them Web 3.0 gambling successful? I think they might need a user identity for something, yes this is just a caution to you. having to be decentralized is more of a thing and it should have no KYC at all.
^ I think there is, https://www.esports.net/news/top-3-blockchain-gaming-platforms/.Here in the forum if I am not mistaken, Gandom casino is also a web3 casino.
Because once the casino is licensed and regulated it is expected that the casino will ask for KYC from their user and right, this web3 is just marketing ads that mislead new gambler thing web3 is a fully decentralized casino. However, some of them, have dApp that does not really ask for KYC and probably there is but only minor information such as the mobile number and email address.
Are any of those who named them Web 3.0 gambling successful? I think they might need a user identity for something, yes this is just a caution to you. having to be decentralized is more of a thing and it should have no KYC at all.
Is web 3 a misunderstanding word for some gambling crypto projects? I've come across few gambling / crypto projects that claimed to be a web 3.0 online casino and other but they still ask for KYC.
The definition of web 3.0 had everything to do with decentralization, block chain technology and token based economics as per what Wikipedia illustrated so why is identity/ verification integrated?
Is this just a misunderstanding of what web 3 actually is? Or it's a way to attract people/users to make them think that their platform is more advanced?.
This happens when the when the gamblers do not understand what they really needs or understand the meaning of web 3.0. I have see many crypto projects that are been claiming to be on web 3.0 and help users to stay decentralized. When we don't understand what we want the problem will continue and this had been the market problem of many users and crypto investors including gamblers. The definition of web 3.0 had everything to do with decentralization, block chain technology and token based economics as per what Wikipedia illustrated so why is identity/ verification integrated?
Is this just a misunderstanding of what web 3 actually is? Or it's a way to attract people/users to make them think that their platform is more advanced?.
The casinos are required by the law to ask for KYC verification. It doesn't matter how "decentralized" they claim to be.
Of course, they can decide to stay on the dark side and never comply to any rules and regulations. This might hurt their business in the long term. I'm not an expert in the field or web3 and smart contracts, but I think that truly decentralized gambling games must be really slow and they usually don't provide a good experience for the player/gambler. The way online casinos operate will remain centralized in the next few years. Web3 is more like a buzzword, similar to ICOs back in 2017, DeFi, NFTs and all the other "shiny objects" and "innovations" surrounding the crypto world.
Of course, they can decide to stay on the dark side and never comply to any rules and regulations. This might hurt their business in the long term. I'm not an expert in the field or web3 and smart contracts, but I think that truly decentralized gambling games must be really slow and they usually don't provide a good experience for the player/gambler. The way online casinos operate will remain centralized in the next few years. Web3 is more like a buzzword, similar to ICOs back in 2017, DeFi, NFTs and all the other "shiny objects" and "innovations" surrounding the crypto world.
I see most people pointing out if Web 3.0 casino that require KYC is a red flag and just a marketing purpose since it's not actually decentralized, does it mean this casino is shady and deserved to get negative tag? I think when the casino has a red flag and didn't remove the words that's controversial, DT members will give negative tag to them. There's many web 3.0 casino didn't get negative tag yet, so?
Is web 3 a misunderstanding word for some gambling crypto projects? I've come across few gambling / crypto projects that claimed to be a web 3.0 online casino and other but they still ask for KYC.
The definition of web 3.0 had everything to do with decentralization, block chain technology and token based economics as per what Wikipedia illustrated so why is identity/ verification integrated?
Is this just a misunderstanding of what web 3 actually is? Or it's a way to attract people/users to make them think that their platform is more advanced?.
This happens when the when the gamblers do not understand what they really needs or understand the meaning of web 3.0. I have see many crypto projects that are been claiming to be on web 3.0 and help users to stay decentralized. When we don't understand what we want the problem will continue and this had been the market problem of many users and crypto investors including gamblers. The definition of web 3.0 had everything to do with decentralization, block chain technology and token based economics as per what Wikipedia illustrated so why is identity/ verification integrated?
Is this just a misunderstanding of what web 3 actually is? Or it's a way to attract people/users to make them think that their platform is more advanced?.
Is web 3 a misunderstanding word for some gambling crypto projects? I've come across few gambling / crypto projects that claimed to be a web 3.0 online casino and other but they still ask for KYC.
The definition of web 3.0 had everything to do with decentralization, block chain technology and token based economics as per what Wikipedia illustrated so why is identity/ verification integrated?
Is this just a misunderstanding of what web 3 actually is? Or it's a way to attract people/users to make them think that their platform is more advanced?.
This happens when the when the gamblers do not understand what they really needs or understand the meaning of web 3.0. I have see many crypto projects that are been claiming to be on web 3.0 and help users to stay decentralized. When we don't understand what we want the problem will continue and this had been the market problem of many users and crypto investors including gamblers. The definition of web 3.0 had everything to do with decentralization, block chain technology and token based economics as per what Wikipedia illustrated so why is identity/ verification integrated?
Is this just a misunderstanding of what web 3 actually is? Or it's a way to attract people/users to make them think that their platform is more advanced?.
Is web 3 a misunderstanding word for some gambling crypto projects? I've come across few gambling / crypto projects that claimed to be a web 3.0 online casino and other but they still ask for KYC.
The definition of web 3.0 had everything to do with decentralization, block chain technology and token based economics as per what Wikipedia illustrated so why is identity/ verification integrated?
Is this just a misunderstanding of what web 3 actually is? Or it's a way to attract people/users to make them think that their platform is more advanced?.
This happens when the when the gamblers do not understand what they really needs or understand the meaning of web 3.0. I have see many crypto projects that are been claiming to be on web 3.0 and help users to stay decentralized. When we don't understand what we want the problem will continue and this had been the market problem of many users and crypto investors including gamblers. The definition of web 3.0 had everything to do with decentralization, block chain technology and token based economics as per what Wikipedia illustrated so why is identity/ verification integrated?
Is this just a misunderstanding of what web 3 actually is? Or it's a way to attract people/users to make them think that their platform is more advanced?.
Most likely when we hear web3 casinos, for me it sounds like a new era of gambling, until we start to experience that certain casinos and end up being disappointed. It’s still the same with the usuals casinos asking for KYC, nothing is really new. I guess the term web3 is just put and being associated in the names of the casinos just to attract new users and become tempted to play. Yes, this is more of a false advertisement which I think any casino that is doing that should be given a red flag and negative feedback so they can also learn their lesson.
There's nothing new just exactly as you've made mention when it comes to gambling casinos stating they are incorporating a web3 gambling website, it makes no any different from the ones we have in existence before and web3 has nothing to do with stopping them from demanding for KYC at the end, we know it's part of a marketing strategy adopted to captivate gamblers where as some may also come in claiming theirs is 3D or HD graphics casino or betting site which mean thesame thing as a marketing strategy or repackaging.
Some casinos will do everything just to attract players despite their deceiving advertisements. I've come across a casino claiming to be web 3.0 but to my surprise after wagering and upon withdrawal, they asked me to submit the KYC requirements which made me lose interest in that casino. I guess that's just their marketing strategy since they all know that most players prefer casinos that won't ask for KYC.
First of all, if a casino is web 3, does it means that it will not ask for KYC
Anyways i do agree that some casino just uses the hype of the latest technologies and try to gain customers which is very wrong in my opinion. Advertising is the right of casinos but false advertising is something that should be avoided. If any casino is found doing false advertisements, they may gain some gamblers for the time being but later the truth will be revealed, and gamblers will never trust that site.
A casino should focus on the true facts and not make false ads only to gain new users. If gambling sites do like that, people will talk bad about those sites and soon no one will play there.
I may be wrong but I believe web3 is still in its early stages. It's still a mere idea ("putting power in the hands of individuals rather than corporations", "give power back to the users" *) that hasn't completely been conceptualized yet.
Other than the technical challenges devs are facing to make this technology applicable, we should not forget the legislative challenges: a licensed casino is forced by laws to ask for kyc!
The main difference I've noticed between casinos promoting themselves as web3 and other casinos is the possibility to create and access your account by connecting your wallet. Also, they have their own tokens which are supposed to be used on different platforms. All the rest is practically the same.
* https://ethereum.org/en/web3/
Other than the technical challenges devs are facing to make this technology applicable, we should not forget the legislative challenges: a licensed casino is forced by laws to ask for kyc!
The main difference I've noticed between casinos promoting themselves as web3 and other casinos is the possibility to create and access your account by connecting your wallet. Also, they have their own tokens which are supposed to be used on different platforms. All the rest is practically the same.
* https://ethereum.org/en/web3/
Jump to: