Pages:
Author

Topic: Abusing behaviours by nutildah and JollyGood (Read 794 times)

legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
October 08, 2024, 03:17:52 PM
#45
in my opinion, abuse is abuse even against a scammer.this leads me to post here

This is contradictory. There can be no abuse of trust feedback if it is used against scammers and cheaters. What you call abuse, most DT members consider a fair use of the trust system.
Do you have any suspicions as to who is behind the BTT_Temp_Acc? I think I know.

Man, check his BTT_Temp_Acc writing style, we have seen it many times. But he has already changed so many accounts that it is difficult to remember all of them. Register a new account to insult and try to make new dramas with DT members, if he had done it with one of the older accounts, no one would have paid attention.
I would not take him seriously in any further discussion.
If it is not the OP then one thing is for sure, the pattern is very similar to another member.

As you stated, there are that many alt-accounts that it is difficult to remember them all but the pattern does stand out but you are right because if he used the same old tagged accounts nobody would have paid attention and may would have kept them on ignore. It seems easier to create an account, attack some members then go back in to hiding.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 3507
Crypto Swap Exchange
all boiled down to a biased tag without analysing full story or a tag on request, right?
Wrong  Roll Eyes
Man, check his BTT_Temp_Acc writing style, we have seen it many times. But he has already changed so many accounts that it is difficult to remember all of them. Register a new account to insult and try to make new dramas with DT members, if he had done it with one of the older accounts, no one would have paid attention.
I would not take him seriously in any further discussion.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
Kinda curious, if all these accounts are connected why is only 1 tagged? If they are a cheater on 1 account, wouldn't that mean cheater on all? Assuming the proof posted is concrete evidence. I would invite all the other accounts to chime in.
The concrete part of the proof is rejected by the OP using his TheGreatPython account with the most pointless of excuses imaginable but he had to make at least one attempt to get the tags removed otherwise all of his efforts to build up the account would have been wasted. It is quite laughable to be honest.

I cannot speak for others but I have not had time to going through them to determine which tags are appropriate for them but I intend to tag accounts that deserve them, it all comes down to having enough time.

all boiled down to a biased tag without analysing full story or a tag on request, right?
Wrong  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2594
Top Crypto Casino
in my opinion, abuse is abuse even against a scammer.this leads me to post here

This is contradictory. There can be no abuse of trust feedback if it is used against scammers and cheaters. What you call abuse, most DT members consider a fair use of the trust system.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114

How about you stop being lazy and do your own research? This is the internet: anybody can say anything, and without proof or something to back it up, it means nothing.

first thing first, why this is a newbie account:
theymos once said this:
Quote
when you do not want to mess up with your original account, create a new one

Ah yes, the clause that launched a thousand shit stirring alt accounts. You took the liberty of rewording it a bit, but that's fine.

You're no Edward Snowden. You're not a whistleblower reporting on a wrongdoing that exposes the faults of the system. You're just stirring shit because you're mad I tagged one your other accounts. Have a fantastic day.
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
3. The password of nutildah account has been reset for exact 10 times within the time frame of 3 months in 2018.
So what if he changed password ten times in few months?
i guess suchmoon and i got this perfectly  Grin  Grin

Additional Notes

Great strategy, claim that you're unfairly accused by launching unfounded accusations at others.

legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
3. The password of nutildah account has been reset for exact 10 times within the time frame of 3 months in 2018.
So what if he changed password ten times in few months?
I didn't notice any abusive behavior from him, and this has nothing to do with changing of account passwords.
With this post you are just going to motivate him to do more investigation and find more connections, so good luck Wink
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
I tagged the TheGreatPython account because even though you he managed to either convince (or bore the hell out of) nutildah in to removing his neutral tag, I was convinced you he deserved it.
please explain why on the same day.because you were active on the topic but waited until nutildah to remove

you sound like you tagged based on nutildah comment while removing but never looked at the conversation happened for 3 weeks

all boiled down to a biased tag without analysing full story or a tag on request, right?
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 2305
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
I would invite all the other accounts to chime in.
Only lixer and aralmus is active now.

lixer, Laosai and OP, all three have also claimed reward from Luckybit- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4123350
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 4603
Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing
Kinda curious, if all these accounts are connected why is only 1 tagged? If they are a cheater on 1 account, wouldn't that mean cheater on all? Assuming the proof posted is concrete evidence. I would invite all the other accounts to chime in.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
why JollyGood started tagging on the same day and not before?

in my opinion, abuse is abuse even against a scammer.this leads me to post here
You created an account specifically to post this so-called accusation of abuse? You are seriously deluded however I will entertain your BTT_Temp_Acc for a single post.

I tagged the TheGreatPython account because even though you he managed to either convince (or bore the hell out of) nutildah in to removing his neutral tag, I was convinced you he deserved it. After I left the original tag, you he sent a PM asking me to remove the tag. I stated I would revise it and I did. Had your the TheGreatPython account left matters as they were, you he would have continued building the account making use of the account farm.

Unfortunately for you him you he did not appreciate one word in my neutral feedback and the rest regarding your his account is history.

Oh damn, I was too late here!

I just love those topics, whenever I see somebody with a red tag coming and playing the innocent I always feel tempted to bet with how many extra tags he's going to leave the topic!

He started with two neutrals and was supposed to walk away with 4 red tags?
I'm saying supposed to because it seems like he's not giving up yet, why can't people read the room, is it because they have an IQ below room temperature or what?  Grin

So, he's got some 30+ accounts discovered, any bets on how many have not yet been linked? 40? 60?
Yes, you should have been here a lot sooner but better late than never.

He thought he would create a thread that would give him sympathy leading to his neutral trust being removed but on the contrary it helped bring that part of his account farm to an abrupt end.

He was even challenging the connected payments still claiming innocence but looks as though he has given up on using the account now. He will be busy trying to build up his other accounts no doubt.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
Oh damn, I was too late here!

I just love those topics, whenever I see somebody with a red tag coming and playing the innocent I always feel tempted to bet with how many extra tags he's going to leave the topic!

He started with two neutrals and was supposed to walk away with 4 red tags?
I'm saying supposed to because it seems like he's not giving up yet, why can't people read the room, is it because they have an IQ below room temperature or what?  Grin

So, he's got some 30+ accounts discovered, any bets on how many have not yet been linked? 40? 60?



newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
first thing first, why this is a newbie account:
theymos once said this:
Quote
when you do not want to mess up with your original account, create a new one

secondly, TheGreatPython must be a shit and i welcome all the red tags for scamming and lying.i do not have any second opinion on this



finally, why not we look into the subject of this topic? why we need to ignore that? just because nutildah found the scamming connections of OP?

why not nutildah and JollyGood take a chance to clear the doubts?

was nutildah a traded account? why password was changed 10 times in 2018?

why nutildah convinced to remove his tag from OP and why did not convince for 3 weeks.what finally changed to remove the tag?

why JollyGood started tagging on the same day and not before?



in my opinion, abuse is abuse even against a scammer.this leads me to post here
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
there's only 3 input and 2 output, where address 1PNQDmVYFhofPSBZKonz8RKUhxSFUFrQnN used on both input and output which deviate from the common behavior.
There is no such common behaviour; when "new change addy" option was not opted, then either one of the input will appear in output as well.

Only in rare cases, exchanges/casinos will able to find exact inputs for a required output+fees for a transaction. In most cases, a change addy is needed and when "new change addy" option was not enabled then one addy will appear in both input and output.

And why would exchange/casino send the change to one of customer deposit address? It could add bug or technical complexity, such as accidentally add more balance to user's account when in fact the user never make deposit. Besides, change address feature has been around for very long time and enabled by default even on Bitcoin-Qt. Here are some references link i found from quick search,
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Change&oldid=19017
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/q/4617
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6320
Crypto Swap Exchange

You are so shamelessly full of shit that its laughable. How you could have been around for this long and not have the first clue how bitcoin transactions work doesn't make any sense. Unless you're lying about everything, in which case, nobody should trust anything you have to say.

This is the problem with account buying: should all the accounts connected to this one get tagged or should they not, seeing as how two of them went on the be semi-decent contributors to the forum.

They should all be tagged.

If they want to join a sig campaign it gives the CM some more info as to if they want them in their campaign.
If they are going to be buying / selling things then people dealing with them would want to know.

Now, I left a neg for TheGreatPython and gave them a ~ in my trust list. If I have time this week, I will probably go though the rest, but real life keeps getting in the way of forum time so who knows if I will ever get to doing that.

-Dave
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino


It is a bit late under the circumstances but the OP did send a PM before he created this thread. The only reason he created it was because the original neutral feedback was revised to add the following: After being questioned about whether the "TheGreatPython" account was being controlled/operated by the original creator, he signed a message purporting to show ownership.

Thanks to nutildah and lovesmayfamilis whatever plans the OP had for the account have been thwarted.
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 2003
A Bitcoiner chooses. A slave obeys.
Lol. Great thread.

Nutilda and Jollygood you two have once again amazed this community with your "investigation skills" and flushed out another scammer.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114

You are so shamelessly full of shit that its laughable. How you could have been around for this long and not have the first clue how bitcoin transactions work doesn't make any sense. Unless you're lying about everything, in which case, nobody should trust anything you have to say.

This is the problem with account buying: should all the accounts connected to this one get tagged or should they not, seeing as how two of them went on the be semi-decent contributors to the forum.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
If he looks like a scammer, cheater and ban evader, creates stupid threads on this section like a scammer, cheater and ban evader, and when caught red handed replies like a scammer, cheater and ban evader, then I call him a scammer, cheater and ban evader.

To be fair, "I cannot recall" is a legal defence in many places.   Roll Eyes

(from an exchange or casino, could not recall).
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2594
Top Crypto Casino
there's only 3 input and 2 output, where address 1PNQDmVYFhofPSBZKonz8RKUhxSFUFrQnN used on both input and output which deviate from the common behavior.
There is no such common behaviour; when "new change addy" option was not opted, then either one of the input will appear in output as well.

Only in rare cases, exchanges/casinos will able to find exact inputs for a required output+fees for a transaction. In most cases, a change addy is needed and when "new change addy" option was not enabled then one addy will appear in both input and output.

You are missing the point here. It's not just about the change address. It's about the fact that you (or whoever was using that wallet at that time) used multiple input addresses, linked to different forum accounts, and combined them in the same transactions to send funds to addresses that are also part of the same wallet but used by other forum accounts. No exchange or casino, or any other custodial service for that matter, would do something like this.

And let's not forget that almost all of the related accounts were registered on the forum around the same time. That's another "coincidence" that's hard to ignore.

Honestly, you dug your own grave when you started this thread. Your best bet was to come clean and admit that you bought this account and have nothing to do with the previous owner. But you're too stubborn to do that. Instead, you're insisting that you're the original owner, which is just digging yourself a deeper hole. Given the connections between this account and other known scammers, cheaters and ban evaders, the negative tag is completely justified.
Pages:
Jump to: