ACCOUNT CONNECTED OR NOT - page 2. | Bitcointalksearch.org

Stalker22

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1355

Quote from: YOSHIE on January 23, 2022, 11:04:58 AM

Question:
Did they do anything wrong, if yes, show me the evidence here accurately, I will mark them.
~

I found that yohananaomi and elisabetheva participated in [YOUengine] campaign, and in doing so violated the rules of the campaign. But that was more than a year ago so I do not know if it still counts.

Proof of authentication: yohananaomi [archive], elisabetheva [archive]

He even posted one PoA application form with the wrong user account:

Quote from: BTCITA187 on May 25, 2020, 05:23:48 PM

Terms and Rules
~
6. Using multiple accounts, cheating and spamming are not allowed. You will be disqualified from the bounty program immediately and all of your accounts will be banned permanently.

shasan

copper member

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1241

Need a Bounty Manager? t.me/shasan32

I wanted to tell that we can't say they may not connected as transactions may happen with friends and local people. But the proof of their authentication it is clear that they are connected. And if they break any rules (joining on same campaign/ merit transaction/trust exchange or something like that) then they should be tagged.

YOSHIE

legendary

Activity: 2086

Merit: 1759

Have you seen the reports for them, linked to each other.

Read below, regarding their case.
Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55605221

In this case, I conclude yes, they are the same person.

Again the problem here, having multiple accounts is legal, having multiple accounts, to cheat, violate forum rules etc, that's what is not allowed.

In this case, if they are wrong from the start they will be punished according to their mistake.

Question:
Did they do anything wrong, if yes, show me the evidence here accurately, I will mark them.
Note:
Just for the three of them: @yohananaomi, @elisabetheva, @lepbagong, based on preliminary and current evidence if any.

Not with @sakti0676, proof for me, it's not enough with the transaction alone, although currently @sakti0676, already blocked.

Fullcoinese

full member

Activity: 386

Merit: 135

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. yohananaomi
2. elisabetheva
3. lepbagong
4. sakti0676

Ethereum address : 0xFf0d1746B9036B925A4D40Cc3104a5Ce04413a6d : elisabetheva
Ethereum address : 0x0794c6f120331563516Ff2C0c425eeC81Ad45038 : lepbagong
Ethereum address : 0xc03913C335e1D360566442869f4Ff58179274C45 : lepbagong
Ethereum address : 0x7bc1b970A9225E325511BdAE57722Fa6DA9Bd8fc : yohananaomi
Ethereum address : 0xE86f503e8e9cdc3d4A07eF4f738a0d77F7d61521 : yohananaomi
Ethereum address : 0x6c99fA3410e8aDe5d1214F4E02B73BA503b78F6A : sakti0676

Proof:

Quote from: elisabetheva on September 03, 2017, 10:04:33 PM

Bitcointalk username : elisabetheva
Link to your Twitter post : https://twitter.com/elisabethevaa/status/904524808829804544
Ethereum address : 0xFf0d1746B9036B925A4D40Cc3104a5Ce04413a6d

https://ninjastic.space/post/21485582

Quote from: lepbagong on November 29, 2019, 03:33:17 AM

Proof of Authentication:
Join Campaign: Facebook/Twitter/Signature
Bitcointalk Username : lepbagong
Bitcointalk link : https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lepbagong-1047634
Telegram username : @lepbagong
ETH Wallet : 0x0794c6f120331563516Ff2C0c425eeC81Ad45038

https://ninjastic.space/post/53209994

Quote from: sakti0676 on April 22, 2019, 02:10:57 AM

Proof of joined post
Bitcointalk username: sakti0676
Campaign in which you participate: Media/log & Telegram
ETH address: 0x6c99fA3410e8aDe5d1214F4E02B73BA503b78F6A

https://ninjastic.space/post/50716885

Quote from: yohananaomi on October 17, 2020, 01:28:16 AM

Bounty Manager

Hi BM, I remind you that until now there has not been any realization what you said to repair my wallet.
because I have been following this bounty from the first to the fourth, of course you will see that I try to continue to support this good project.
but all will be in vain if my wallet is not changed because I obviously will not enjoy the rewards that I should receive.

OLD MEW: 0x7bc1b970A9225E325511BdAE57722Fa6DA9Bd8fc

NEW MEW : 0xE86f503e8e9cdc3d4A07eF4f738a0d77F7d61521

https://ninjastic.space/post/55395479

Wallet address engagement

Related Addresses:

Code:

[b]Ethereum address[/b] : 0xFf0d1746B9036B925A4D40Cc3104a5Ce04413a6d     :   elisabetheva
[b]Ethereum address[/b] : 0x0794c6f120331563516Ff2C0c425eeC81Ad45038     :   lepbagong
[b]Ethereum address[/b] : 0xc03913C335e1D360566442869f4Ff58179274C45     :   lepbagong
[b]Ethereum address[/b] : 0x7bc1b970A9225E325511BdAE57722Fa6DA9Bd8fc     :   yohananaomi
[b]Ethereum address[/b] : 0xE86f503e8e9cdc3d4A07eF4f738a0d77F7d61521     :   yohananaomi
[b]Ethereum address[/b] : 0x6c99fA3410e8aDe5d1214F4E02B73BA503b78F6A     :   sakti0676

#elisabetheva send to #lepbagong
Tx ID Coins = 201.99225 GimmerToken (GMR)
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xbb360f9cf5dc5fc971e86b6d2832fac222b064d2e205768b2b093fd1a8b99863

#lepbagong send to #yohananaomi
Tx ID Coins = 3.304 Geoma DAO (GMD)
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x725faded285f99b272cff451fb0aa016687b85b7c7bf8200d22ac78dad56b0e0

#sakti0676 send to #yohananaomi
Tx ID = 0.002 Ether
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x33108fdf740ff110cdbc5a286dce92d745f61e2d11558630ad3334f805ddd76e

#lepbagong send to #sakti0676
Tx ID = 0.005 Ether
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xc306b66f603ccd09ac491cc2bfa63ef61341e303ad19545a34cfce2421953266

#lepbagong send to #sakti0676
Tx ID = 0.006 Ether
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xb896d7013c81006ea77ae283a414d8cf0b760b820f5a17bee39c39af9a047e8e

#lepbagong send to #yohananaomi
Tx ID = 0.002 Ether
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xec0256717d52c4aa71cf08f0f938ff4eb0a8241a744df744be3a2941a55eedb0

#yohananaomi send to #lepbagong
Tx ID = 0.009 Ether
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x1485731b15eb7adbd91b3c697852bfacff9e3b079e8398432f152b062d6cd7d6

What do you think of the data above? Is this behavior shared by the same person or is it just a coincidence?

Topic: ACCOUNT CONNECTED OR NOT - page 2. (Read 754 times)