I'm going to go out on a limb and say that
[BTC]onFIRE was never hacked on the 8th of August and that
[BTC]onFIRE is a chronic scammer with dozens of Alts.
The OP creates this thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/account-hacked-1179091 on the
13 September 2015, 16:37:27 and less than ten hours later goes off-line permanently having posted just once...
Name: [btc]onfire1 u=543354 http://archive.is/mTeoZ
Posts: 1
Activity: 1
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: 09 August 2015, 04:28:48
Last Active: 13 September 2015, 23:14:42
Total Time Spent Online: 25 minutes.
Total Posts: 1 posts
Total Topics Started: 1 topics
Number of Polls Created: 0 polls
Number of Votes Cast: 0 votes
When the signed message doesn't appear to hold up,
whywefight ponders:
The actual post:
http://archive.is/6HZUj#selection-545.0-587.44You are welcome, just sent you your 0.001btc
The signed message posted by
[btc]onfire1-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
My account [btc]onfire has been hacked/lost. Please reset the email to [email protected]. The current date is 8 august 2015.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1D53GvfHhuvxKsCJZLPX91oPppkWDRdqNM
H1VpZYbglS7uO4br2VPCZKYPKg+ThvJNA5pIBksDwhMYaru+TSAZ5ciqbqBSN8faD9sn5fvwF9nFtIwcn4dLrs0=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Message verified:
http://coinig.com/?adr=1D53GvfHhuvxKsCJZLPX91oPppkWDRdqNM&msg=My+account+%5Bbtc%5Donfire+has+been+hacked%2Flost.+Please+reset+the+email+to+new.apache%40yahoo.com.+The+current+date+is+8+august+2015.&sig=H1VpZYbglS7uO4br2VPCZKYPKg%2BThvJNA5pIBksDwhMYaru%2BTSAZ5ciqbqBSN8faD9sn5fvwF9nFtIwcn4dLrs0%3DFunds from
1D53GvfHhuvxKsCJZLPX91oPppkWDRdqNM were shifted to
3Px19pCL9xmZattPzCajsqDdGQrVMMpcBG 0.0101613 BTC 2015-09-03 10:30:17 and have sat dormant ever since. Both Wallet Addresses are the sole Wallet Addresses for their respective Wallets -
Wallet [882c19fcb6] and
Wallet [3bf18a15a6]https://twitter.com/btconfire is still tweeting / retweeting - last such post was two days ago. On the other hand...
https://twitter.com/bitcoinonfire returns:
Sorry, that page doesn’t exist!while the Wallet Address
1G53GvfHhuvxKsCJZLPX91oPppkWDRdq returns a
Checksum does not validate as confirmed previously.
Right up until the day before the UID was "hacked", they were using the Wallet Address
1D53GvfHhuvxKsCJZLPX91oPppkWDRdqNM used to then reclaim the account by
[btc]onfire1:
First use is at top of post.
Second use:
http://archive.is/AAVdS#selection-3655.0-3681.23 (note the use of day-month-year)
# Username: [ btc ]onfire
# Bitcoin Address: 1D53GvfHhuvxKsCJZLPX91oPppkWDRdqNM
# Member Type: full member
# Date Joined: 8-6-2015
Fourth use:
http://archive.is/4oTF0#selection-1573.0-1619.47Fifth use:
http://archive.is/VKSv6#selection-7175.0-7203.34Last use:
http://archive.is/eoiUX#selection-4465.0-4484.8your faucet so mobile friendly
and i have claimed 500 satoshi thanks
i want free 10000 satoshi too
1D53GvfHhuvxKsCJZLPX91oPppkWDRdqNM thanks
all of which
could have been modified by the "hacker" but weren't.
The fact the account has stopped being used tells me a scammer was in control of the account [BTC]onFIRE wanted it to appear as though the account had been hacked and then abandoned.
Name: [BTC]onFIRE
Posts: 223
Activity: 223
Position: Full Member
Date Registered: 04 February 2015, 11:22:39
Last Active: 15 September 2015, 11:59:11
The scammer has a sense of irony though:
http://archive.is/naNSu#selection-5805.47-5805.85though I doubt I'll see any of the promised
BTC 10.0 any time soon...
http://archive.is/naNSu#selection-1581.0-1585.5http://archive.is/naNSu#selection-2597.0-2597.82http://archive.is/naNSu#selection-3965.0-3967.40No-one followed up on this though:
http://archive.is/AOlSW#selection-4401.0-4421.244I can confirm that the hacker/current owner of the account BTConfire is Candystripes/Pierre11, who are serial scammers. This user has also scammed me out of 1.3~ BTC recently. DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS ACCOUNT UNTIL THE ORIGINAL OWNER GETS IT BACK.
No negative trust on their wall, and no scam accusation that I can see.
Still not sure how these codes actually work but given the short activity of
titaniumfox I'd say they are an Alt of the scammer who took over the OP's main account.
Name: titaniumfox u=397979 http://archive.is/OWDHz
Posts: 13
Activity: 13
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: 26 November 2014, 14:37:26
Last Active: 22 October 2015, 13:16:23
Re: [ 18.5+ BTC PAID! ] CryptoFATE.com == GET 150% INSTANTLY == TRANSPARENT AND FAIR
19 October 2015, 18:43:08
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12726250 (Locked thread)
http://archive.is/QxdUM#selection-2595.0-2617.34'I want to link my Bitcointalk name with BTCJam's. Verification code: 4374f135-d03f-4ee2-a586-a01178658eb2'
http://archive.is/D4OIE#selection-4813.0-4833.107'I want to link my Bitcointalk name with BTCJam's. Verification code: 4374f135-d03f-4ee2-a586-a01178658eb2'
http://archive.is/D4OIE#selection-4989.0-5009.107'I want to link my Bitcointalk name with BTCJam's. Verification code: 224b2b57-d504-46ae-8389-868d5e0603e6'
http://archive.is/Yb60b#selection-4789.0-4809.107'I want to link my Bitcointalk name with BTCJam's. Verification code: 224b2b57-d504-46ae-8389-868d5e0603e6'
Name: alieksandrv u=530846 http://archive.is/mbkf8
Posts: 1
Activity: 1
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: 06 July 2015, 06:58:47
Last Active: 31 May 2016, 16:11:26
Same page as alieksandrv post:
http://archive.is/Yb60b#selection-2015.0-2034.1'I want to link my Bitcointalk name with BTCJam's. Verification code: cd185ec0-03e3-43aa-9079-fae6acab87a9'
MAsterV referral use of that code on BCT:
http://archive.is/rHmnX#selection-3963.0-3965.109 but doesn't appear to be otherwise connected. [1]
OK, so we have the following::
Accounts connected: [BTC]onFIRE,
[btc]onfire1,
and separately, we have:
Accounts connected: (unknown scammer),
titaniumfox,
alieksandrv,
So, where are we at?I connected:
ozgr, misteagle, reyhiesa, zhuravskij3, Desert Flame, nickaizoku, bms2013, Berthorl, SvintuShere:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14394021 using Wallet Address
1BwnkpAb7zxozGfsyEc4tbguhDuQi6RScr so if
titaniumfox is using 1BwnkpAb7zxozGfsyEc4tbguhDuQi6RScr that means the hacker is an Alt of
ozgr, misteagle, reyhiesa, zhuravskij3, Desert Flame, nickaizoku, bms2013, Berthorl, SvintuS and by extension, so are
alieksandrv, planetroving, Lamigo, afidwildan, Nami, kingwasabi, Thresh, Shyvana, Proof:titaniumfoxhttp://archive.is/qgpze#selection-2103.0-2127.6Username: planetroving
Thanks
http://archive.is/qgpze#selection-2275.0-2297.7Username: Lamigo
Thanks.
http://archive.is/qgpze#selection-2627.0-2649.8username : afidwildan
Thankyou
planetrovinghttp://archive.is/bDnWq#selection-2247.0-2271.6Username: planetroving
Thanks
http://archive.is/qeD58#selection-5321.0-5345.6Username: topkek
Thanks
http://archive.is/nbBVu#selection-927.0-951.6Username: planetroving
Thanks
http://archive.is/H9ytT#selection-5359.0-5383.6 (third Alt on the one page)
Username: planetroving
Thanks
bms2013 and zhuravskij3 posts on the same page that Thresh posts three times:
http://archive.is/LIKnX#selection-3003.0-3025.7my username: bms2013
thanks!
http://archive.is/LIKnX#selection-7061.0-7083.25zhurYRA
Thanks for awesome promo!
http://archive.is/LIKnX#selection-8387.0-8763.6Username: planetroving
Thanks
Username: TurboMen
Thank you !
Username: Dongtsy
Thanks
At this point, it almost appears to become exponential the number of Alts that are connected. Perhaps someone else might like to delve further into these Alts?
is in close proximity, so I began to wonder if they (and therefore all) of these Alts are connected?
so that's a dead end...
that have been edited on the 14th of September 2015 which is *after* this thread was started.
also appears 11 posts earlier on the same page - ( 47 and a half hours earlier ) with Wallet Address
which is our OP thread date...