Topic: Account ownership and way forward (Read 255 times)

This is very interesting forum, i have never seen in my life, i was making a research online and get a point to find my self here, i hope i am welcome, Hence respect to the topic, it we show clear when person changes account handle because the person sentence will be difference from the original, i believed i we become member from Graze to Grace.   

wanting to earn money from a bounty or signature campaign is quite understandable, but if that is the only goal then the purpose of the forum is just a place to earn money, not a place to discuss and gain a lot of knowledge about crypto.
The difficulty of getting merit can be skipped and the veteran members here have helped a lot with threads made to give merit to good posts like this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/merit-share-your-best-poststhreads-with-fillippone-to-be-merit-assessed-5412657 and there are several others
building an account from scratch will give you confidence compared to buying it that you don't even understand how the history of the bought account is because it is impossible to check every post from the beginning how the account was built

I do understand your point, but as I already said, I don't really agree with it (I would consider those also shady).

I understand all you said but you have to also know that some people will buy accounts to quicken the process to enroll in campaigns and earn and not because they want to scam or spam. You know that ranking up is not easy especially now that we have merit preventing members from moving up. Some of this members are good posters but do not get merits enough. Not everyone has the endurance of waiting years to move up to the next rank. So this members just buy accounts yo make it faster for themselves. Am not encouraging account sales in anyway but am only saying what I think the problem is. I hope you understand my point too?

1. I wrote "usually". That means most of the cases, but not all.

2. I do expect that some want to buy accounts for campaigns. I also expect that most of those buying accounts for using them in bounty campaigns will actually spam.
A honest user can learn his way in bitcoin and bitcointalk ranking up normally.
Taking shortcuts will lead to problems and, even if the reason is bounties/campaigns is still shady; just imagine (paid) posts made by a high rank account talking about things he has no idea at all (of course, I know, it can happen sometimes even with honest/not bought accounts). Then, if the user is knowledgeable, the bought account may be a secondary account. Using multiple accounts in campaigns is prohibited; using multiple accounts in campaigns can easily lead to low quality posts. Hence, again, shady.

I hope you can agree with all this.

I also feel it is a big contradiction too. That part of the forum rule should be edited. It is either yes or no and not lukewarmness. The admins should let us know clearly what the forum stand on account sales is.


This is a nice suggestion. It will help reduce account hacks in the forum if implemented.


This is not true in all cases. What about those who only need it so they can get into bounty and signature campaigns in order to earn? Or you think there are no members like that?

Accounts sales continue. Now, many telegram channels sell accounts from the forum. The condition for the sale of which is not to change the password.
Here is an example of one purchased account.


If someone wants to sell their account, they will sell it anyway, having thought through the process of buying and selling, everything can be done discreetly.
But all the same, the purchased accounts are calculated according to other factors, which in the end still play against the buyer.

If there is no strict restriction on this issue, people will continue to sell accounts while claiming they only changed their emails or passwords.
I've seen some threads discussing the implementation of 2FA in forum accounts, which I believe will help to reduce quick and immediate account compromise, as each user will use the 2FA security to strengthen their account security.

What if the email has been forgotten? Password can be used to change the email. And if the password is forgetting, the email can be used to reset the password. Somehow, these are connected.

I do understand your point perfectly but it seems you're getting the whole thing wrong. I'm not saying the email should be removed from the account entirely as you portray to understand. What I mean is that you shouldn't be allow to change the email but you can still recover your password if you have access to that particular email linked with your account.

If that's the case then why do people raise concern when they noticed that a user changed his/her email? If nobody cares, then account selling will continue on a steady basis.

You still do not understand me.

If you want to change your password, you will need to reset it. An email would be sent it to your email (once you click on forgot password on bitcointalk login page) which is a link that contains a password reset page where you can change to new password. Without the email, password reset is not possible.

there was even a service for calculating the value of forum profiles https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcointalk-account-price-estimator-1142314
I think it is at least until serious abuse is recognised by buying accounts.
now I can't even remember the last time a serious case happened, where a high-ranked and active account was sold. it is obvious that the current method still gives some results.

@Yawa2020, do you know that once in the past it was quite normal to sell/buy BTT accounts? I think that sometime during 2015, a change was introduced where such practice became undesirable, but not prohibited. Then some members started tagging all the accounts that would be involved in such activities in any way, even if it was only about the intention to buy/sell, without it actually happening.

I think that the current way of dealing with this problem is not ideal, but since there is a merit system, it is much more difficult, so to speak, to produce high-quality BTT accounts that would then be offered for sale. No matter how the rules are set, there will always be people who will find a way to do what they want, but there will always be those who will detect their bad intentions.


That rule would not make sense, because what if a user who is a Hero/Legendary comes to a situation where the provider through which he has e-mail no longer exists? Therefore, the option to change the e-mail must always be available, regardless of possible manipulation. In addition, some sellers of BTT accounts even offer the option for the buyer to receive an original e-mail with a password and private key of the signed address - and the only way to notice that the owner has changed is in the writing style.

I think I grabbed your points now. Thanks! but I don't see that workable if there are strict rules here. The buyers will be cautious due to the fear of repercussions that might come aftermath.

In the same way some try to sell here now and then reddit or Twitter accounts, for example, they can try to sell bitcointalk accounts on other bitcoin-related social media platforms (other forums, discord, telegram channels, whatever). Probably some even do that (i.e. right now) to try to go under the radar, I don't know. But the (bitcoin) world is bigger than just bitcointalk (although most "places" may not deserve attention, this is still a reality).

I'm sorry to say I don't understand what your point clearly and this reply got me more confused. As in where else can they sell the account if not here? I mean the forum.
You mean what if the password is forgotten right? Well, I didn't say the password should not be changed but the email. I hope you get it right now.
Exchange sessions do expires and asks for verification when you try to log in after your session expired.

I like the suggestions, but except these two:

That kind of a rule is sheep in wolves clothing. What is password is forgotten. This is invasion of users' rights of account ownership.

Why? Even on exchanges that people have money, they can be able to login easily after a long period of time.

Members here change their email addresses for so many reasons, especially security related, sorry this can't work, everyone, of any rank should change their email whenever they want and feel the need to.
Bruh...i feel the problem of account sales is rather inconspicuous to a great extent in order to start complicating things with the forum system, 'don't try to fix what's not broken'.

---

This topic is for meta anyway.

You seem to have missed what I wrote above that, so I'll quote it again:


So declaring it "against the rules" would do nothing good/useful.
On the other hand, the risk of getting red tag on those accounts (i.e. the accounts that changed hands) is quite a discouragement, isn't it?

It's no secret that buying accounts will be of interest either to scammers or bounty hunters who are going to participate in signature companies. 
I agree with you that the rules should be more specific. Either you can buy it or you can't. But in the rules, we see there is a small note that this is not welcome, so the one who bought should be prepared for any outcome in the future. I know purchased accounts are tagged on a case-by-case basis, although buying and impersonating someone else is a sign of fraud. And such accounts need to have a negative tag by default. 
This has been brought up many times, but until now the rules remain as they were at the beginning, so OP, you have made fair comments, but they will not change anything.