Topic: âš’[CGA] Cryptographic Anomaly - The Elusive Coinâš’ - page 66. (Read 226291 times)
Poloniex exchange is frozen for some reason. Maybe all the CGA love killed it
Is the transaction fee in the wallet random? I sent 5 CGA and the fee was 0.008 CGA. Then I sent another 5 CGA and fee increased to 0.05 CGA and when I sent 5 CGA for the 3rd time, the fee is 0.099 CGA which seems too high. I had thought the fee was usually a fixed amount.
Just posted about the coin on my blog with 1k mailing list of followers: http://fuk.io/mineable-cryptocurrencie-to-invest-in-right-now/
great im oen of subscribers
Yes sir!
@s4w3d0ff
Can you post the contest link http://justanarcade.com in the OP?
Can you post the contest link http://justanarcade.com in the OP?
Just posted about the coin on my blog with 1k mailing list of followers: http://fuk.io/mineable-cryptocurrencie-to-invest-in-right-now/
Everybody
Upvote CGA into CoindUp on reddit!
Vote for CGA to be on ATOMIC-TRADE.com
Help get CGA on Cryptsy!
Vote for CGA on AllCrypt.com!
Vote for CGA on Mintpal.com!
Vote for CGA on swisscex.com
CGA UP UP 
Just posted about the coin on my blog with 1k mailing list of followers: http://fuk.io/mineable-cryptocurrencie-to-invest-in-right-now/
Cryptographic Anomaly... Not Cryptogenic
THANKS FOR THE POST!
Just posted about the coin on my blog with 1k mailing list of followers: http://fuk.io/mineable-cryptocurrencie-to-invest-in-right-now/
CGA prices going insane!
CGA is up 1000% for all you happy campers.
0.00976
24-hour Volume: 17.99688364 BTC / 2494.11723041 CGA
24-hour Volume: 17.99688364 BTC / 2494.11723041 CGA
I love how everyone who hears or reads about CGA sticks to it, awesome trading volume!
Edit: Can someone with OSX 10.9 try this one for me? http://cganomaly.com/downloads/Cryptographicanomaly-Qt.app.tar
Tried it
Quote
Dyld Error Message:
Library not loaded: /opt/local/lib/libminiupnpc.8.dylib
Referenced from: /Volumes/VOLUME/*/Cryptographicanomaly-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/Cryptographicanomaly-Qt
Reason: image not found
Binary Images:
0x7fff67ec9000 - 0x7fff67efc817 dyld (239.3) /usr/lib/dyld
Library not loaded: /opt/local/lib/libminiupnpc.8.dylib
Referenced from: /Volumes/VOLUME/*/Cryptographicanomaly-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/Cryptographicanomaly-Qt
Reason: image not found
Binary Images:
0x7fff67ec9000 - 0x7fff67efc817 dyld (239.3)
Think that should be the issue.
Missing miniupnpc lib?
Edit: I think that lib is optional. Did the app work tho?
Nope. It directly closes with an error message and the debug code I posted
I'll see if I can get another copy from tf2honeybadger. That one I had just unziped the one I had and put it in a tar.
how do allow 10 or more connections to the wallet and solo mine. It won't allow me to connect more then 4 connections. Thanks
I'm not sure... Try adding maxconnections=60 in your config file. I could be completly wrong tho, I have never had the need to connect 10 miners to one wallet. You could try and make a P2P.
how do allow 10 or more connections to the wallet and solo mine. It won't allow me to connect more then 4 connections. Thanks
Edit: Can someone with OSX 10.9 try this one for me? http://cganomaly.com/downloads/Cryptographicanomaly-Qt.app.tar
Tried it
Quote
Dyld Error Message:
Library not loaded: /opt/local/lib/libminiupnpc.8.dylib
Referenced from: /Volumes/VOLUME/*/Cryptographicanomaly-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/Cryptographicanomaly-Qt
Reason: image not found
Binary Images:
0x7fff67ec9000 - 0x7fff67efc817 dyld (239.3) /usr/lib/dyld
Library not loaded: /opt/local/lib/libminiupnpc.8.dylib
Referenced from: /Volumes/VOLUME/*/Cryptographicanomaly-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/Cryptographicanomaly-Qt
Reason: image not found
Binary Images:
0x7fff67ec9000 - 0x7fff67efc817 dyld (239.3)
Think that should be the issue.
Missing miniupnpc lib?
Edit: I think that lib is optional. Did the app work tho?
Nope. It directly closes with an error message and the debug code I posted
Quote
Every coin has a risk to be 51% attacked (even bitcoin, tho that is very improbable unless someone were to highjack ALL the super computers in the world). This is the "double spending" attack where you mine your own transations and manipulate the network into giving you more coins.
The attack that was described earlier in this thread (re-org attack) is specific to Kimoto's Gravity Well. Coins with low network hash rate are more susceptible to this attack. You wouldn't really need 51%, just a decent amount of hash power and good timing. So I removed KGW.
The main issue with CGA was the fact that there are/were 0 blocks mixed in with blocks of worth. Due to the current protocol, you must know what the block is worth before you mine it. So someone "could" write a script that checks the current block to see if it is worth anything, and if it isn't stop mining. Then wait for a block that is of worth and start mining again. This was fixed by making every block worth something (this doesn't come into effect until block 48,000). All I did was divide the coin up among the blocks that would normally be 0. So, if the diff were to be at 3, you will see the block reward = 0.333333 when before/now it was/is the first 2 blocks would be worth 0 and the third would be worth 1.
The attack that was described earlier in this thread (re-org attack) is specific to Kimoto's Gravity Well. Coins with low network hash rate are more susceptible to this attack. You wouldn't really need 51%, just a decent amount of hash power and good timing. So I removed KGW.
The main issue with CGA was the fact that there are/were 0 blocks mixed in with blocks of worth. Due to the current protocol, you must know what the block is worth before you mine it. So someone "could" write a script that checks the current block to see if it is worth anything, and if it isn't stop mining. Then wait for a block that is of worth and start mining again. This was fixed by making every block worth something (this doesn't come into effect until block 48,000). All I did was divide the coin up among the blocks that would normally be 0. So, if the diff were to be at 3, you will see the block reward = 0.333333 when before/now it was/is the first 2 blocks would be worth 0 and the third would be worth 1.
Ok I understand that change. That makes a lot of sense. But I guess my concern was, since the higher the difficulty the lower the reward it would deter large mining farms and allow people to mine it with their home computers. I guess the coin would be "resistant to popularity" since if miners jump on it, it becomes too difficult. So with that in mind, if the coin ever becomes valuable and nobody is mining it aggressively enough then isnt it very very easy to quickly mine the living shit out of it and take over the network with higher than 51% and even do a selfish mining attack? I can see this happening especially if the coins ever get valuable because of their rarity. Thats why I proposed my proof of stake solution above. Give a phony account a large stake (like premining millions of coins way beyond what the total supply will ever reach) and pretend like it doesnt even exist. Mind you, I'm still trying to understand all the different algorithms so I would really like to know your feedback on this and if I am making sense or not.
Well I guess I was hoping that since the diff goes up the price (should) go up as well, thus making it more profitable, which (should) make it more popular and make the diff rise even higher. This is all theoretical, I have no idea what will actually happen, but due to the concept supply and demand, I think this coin should be generally stable. Tho I can see if an overwhelming amount of miners were to "hop on board" it could have some negative effects on the profitability of the coin (for a short time).
Wow! can I mine even 1 of these things per day with 3Mh/s ?
Jump to: