om nom nom, chomping away at the ask wall on bitfunder
Not gonna lie, I did the same before transferring over. Also placed a few buy orders in case a few unwittingly drop the price overnight.
Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread - page 337. (Read 479317 times)
Not gonna lie, I did the same before transferring over. Also placed a few buy orders in case a few unwittingly drop the price overnight.
Just tendered all of my AMC shares to AM. I am expecting great things from this. 
Gotcha. I'm going to keep things on bitfunder I guess just a little confused on how do to the actual tendering. Anyone know the play by play on how to do this.
I'm in. Does it make sense to move shares to btct from bitfunder at this point now?
Only if you want them there. According to Ken there is going to be an equivalent on btct.co setup shortly.
Cheers.
I'm in. Does it make sense to move shares to btct from bitfunder at this point now?
om nom nom, chomping away at the ask wall on bitfunder
I am going to work on that later tonight. Soon as everything settles down.
Awesome cheers
Appreciate you have been very busy recently.
Any eta on when activemining will appear on BTCT? I know once its added it still needs to be approved just wondering when it will be submitted?
Cheers.
Cheers.
I am going to work on that later tonight. Soon as everything settles down.
Any eta on when activemining will appear on BTCT? I know once its added it still needs to be approved just wondering when it will be submitted?
Cheers.
Cheers.
one question - comes Havelock Investments not in consideration?
Because Havelock wouldn't allow this crap most likely...
anyone has a right to do his best. I think Ken tries to do so.
time judges then.
i personally wish him a success, because more successful parties is more success for bitcoin in the whole, for us all.
concerning "AM" - yes, it is not the best choice.... Both in the practical and ethical lights. IMHO
It is not "AM", it is "ActiveMining": https://bitfunder.com/asset/ActiveMining. Not much confusion there for me at least!
one question - comes Havelock Investments not in consideration?
Because Havelock wouldn't allow this crap most likely...
anyone has a right to do his best. I think Ken tries to do so.
time judges then.
i personally wish him a success, because more successful parties is more success for bitcoin in the whole, for us all.
concerning "AM" - yes, it is not the best choice.... Both in the practical and ethical lights. IMHO
I don't think ASICMINER has one of these: 24.576 TH/s, 6 Expansion Cases, 96 256 GH/s boards.
How many of those are you guys running at the moment?
Haters gotta hate
Quote
You can buy AM shares directly from https://bitfunder.com/asset/AM (BitFunder). We are also working on getting AM approved on BTC-TC;
How will initial price of AM shares be determined?
one question - comes Havelock Investments not in consideration?
Because Havelock wouldn't allow this crap most likely...
Are you seriously naming whatever this is AM? As if you weren't enough of an ASICMINER wanna-be already...
@TAT Whatever this is, it is going to be a lot bigger that ASICMINER.
I don't think ASICMINER has one of these: 24.576 TH/s, 6 Expansion Cases, 96 256 GH/s boards.
http://axs.net/AMC/HighEnd.png
one question - comes Havelock Investments not in consideration?
Because Havelock wouldn't allow this crap most likely...
Are you seriously naming whatever this is AM? As if you weren't enough of an ASICMINER wanna-be already...
What's wrong with emulating a working formula?
one question - comes Havelock Investments not in consideration?
Because Havelock wouldn't allow this crap most likely...
Are you seriously naming whatever this is AM? As if you weren't enough of an ASICMINER wanna-be already...
In 
Good to see AMC/ActiveMining has made this much progress within the passed 2 weeks. Hopefully we will continue to head in the right direction and we will start seeing progress on the chips being delivered and growing our hash rate. Thanks to Ken, shareholders as well as the members of the community that helped push this transition through.
Jump to: