This is not about someone being right and someone being wrong Jo. I am painting a picture for everyone so that they can see both sides of the coin. Now ask yourself, regardless of what would be the best course of action out of the two being discussed, which one has Ken chosen? How does Ken think? His actions so far suggest it is the latter. Recent demands may well indeed have him changing his tune and we could find out tonight, but the way I see it, no news IS good news (edit - until after we are trading again).
"Now ask yourself, regardless of what would be the best course of action out of the two being discussed, which one has Ken chosen?"
I believe I did this and I told you this and you didn't listen. Ken has all but dropped saying ANYTHING about shares getting on an exchange for three weeks now. NOTHING, he has said NOTHING about getting on an exchange. This is officially on the back burner. He has said and I quote "100%" of the companies resources are NOW devoted to building out machines and getting that entire situation set up. Ken has stated this in an Update and a PM to me.
Please reread what I have said. Don't say anything to me, just reread what I have said. I have proof towards what I am talking about, you do not.
Do not tell me when I can and can't reply.
I have re-read your posts and it's clear that your entire argument rests upon the assumption that Ken has a need or desire to trade when we go live. It rests upon the assumption that Ken is motivated entirely by the fear of prosecution for insider trading. That is absurd. For whatever 'proof' you have it is sandwiched together by your opinion, speculation, assumption and your arrogant self belief that you can not be wrong.
Vigil was wrong about his theory and I may be wrong about mine, but would it hurt you to try a little harder and have a grown up conversation instead of name calling and resorting to juvenile, 'I want the last word' behaviour? Yes, it probably would.
