[ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] - page 238.

zumzero

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

myBitcoin.Garden

Quote from: JoTheKhan on December 11, 2013, 03:21:27 PM

It is Wednesday, do we expect an announcement from Ken today? Or is that starting next week?

I think it's a good idea to think of these announcements as 'The Weekly Update' rather than the 'Wednesday Update'.

Let's say Wednesday plus or minus a day and perhaps that will prevent people getting antsy if it turns out to be a Thursday.

Quote from: ActiveMining-PR on December 10, 2013, 11:27:03 AM

Weekly Update:

We are going to try and give a weekly update on Wednesday of each week
to keep all of Investors up to date on our progress.

First, Ken will be taking all of the AMC-TENDER transaction and adding
those transactions to a database. This database will be used to verify
your shares. Once your shares are verified, they will added to the
queue which will be used at Crypto-Trade to create your account. As
your account is created on Crypto-Trade the number of shares verified
will be added to your account. If you already have a Crypto-Trade
account using the same email address used to verify your shares, then
the shares will just be added to that account. The procedure when ready
will be posted in our Announcement the thread.

Active Mining PR Staff

Stuartuk

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: Mabsark on December 11, 2013, 03:12:05 PM

Please explain how not getting 10% of the network by the end of January means that they're on track to get 10% by the end of 2014?

The funds raised from 40 machines in month 1 is enough to expand the mining farm above the increase in difficulty rate, so the farm growth will outstrip network difficulty increase month on month. See my post, I have calculated the divs month on month till December 2014.

Quote from: Mabsark on December 11, 2013, 03:12:05 PM

Labcoin didn't go well for me, obviously, but it didn't go bad for me either.

Under-statement of the century. You lost a majority percentage of your money in LabCoin. I warned you about it endlessly, but you chose to believe the unbelievable - that you would make 1000BTC in LabCon. You were on here everyday trying to keep ACtM prices low by spreading FUD so that you had the option to buy back in on a low share price. That was very damaging to ACtM shareholders but here you are back again trying to pretend you did nothing wrong.

Mabsark - I am very very happy that you lost 75+% of your money in Labcoin, lessons like that are invaluable in life.

So how many ACtM shares do you have now?

JoTheKhan

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Why do you guys continue to argue with other people who have the same information as you (none)? I'm sure your time can be better spent. We understand; for the few of you who think it is a scam. We get it. We will heed your warnings and proceed with caution. There is no more reason to try and beat it into our skull.

For the rest of you who don't think it is a scam. Please proceed with caution because a few others who you don't know at all think it is a scam and wish to protect you from the real world. Say thank you. Now can we stop this conversation which seems to have been going on for weeks. As you can see we have made NO ground in this regard.

It is Wednesday, do we expect an announcement from Ken today? Or is that starting next week?

Mabsark

legendary

Activity: 826

Merit: 1004

Quote from: Stuartuk on December 11, 2013, 02:41:09 PM

Quote from: Mabsark on December 11, 2013, 02:13:08 PM

You said:

Quote from: ?? on ??

3600BTC are generated every day, there is no speculation in that.

That's not a fact. The fact is, that 50,400 BTC are generated every round, whereas the amount generated daily is variable.

Averaged out yes it's a fact. Sorry if the finer detail was not explained - it is not atall relevant to the estimates being put forward. If you think it is relevant let us know why.

Quote from: Mabsark on December 11, 2013, 02:13:08 PM

Also, this:

Quote from: Stuartuk on December 11, 2013, 12:46:49 PM

We only need 40 of our 24.5TH/s miners to be deployed by the end of January to be on target for taking over 10% of network by end of 2014.

What makes you so certain that the network hash rate will only be 10 Ph/s by the end of January?

I didn't say it would be - not atall. I said quite clearly (you quoted it) that 40 miners would put us on target for 10%+ by end of 2014.
You should read my post from the other day for more detail. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3906211

So in summary you are wrong on both counts.

Please explain how not getting 10% of the network by the end of January means that they're on track to get 10% by the end of 2014?

Quote from: Stuartuk on December 11, 2013, 02:41:09 PM

BTW Mabsark - where have you been? How did Labcoin go for you? Have you made your 1000BTC yet? Did the LC experience humble you or have you turned up here to cause trouble again and tell everyone how much you are going to make from trading BTC securities?

Labcoin didn't go well for me, obviously, but it didn't go bad for me either. I'm better off than I would have been if I just kept my ActM shares. What I said about ActM at the time was true, there would be no miners till December at the earliest and the price would plummet. The price dropped but there's still no miners.

LorenzoMoney

sr. member

Activity: 335

Merit: 250

Ken will make me a millionaire. I have full faith in Ken.

Go ahead, buy my shares, Zums.

Quote from: zumzero on December 11, 2013, 03:00:24 PM

Quote from: LorenzoMoney on December 11, 2013, 02:45:51 PM

Zummikins,

No investor with Madoff was looking to get scammed. No one looks to get scammed. People had big eyes and dreams and ignore data.
We all wants to be the stuff of bitcoin legend having invested in a company that becomes wildly successful.
Active Mining is not a scam, but, at some point, even an honest man can panic when schedules are missed and he wants to save face. A little lie about deadline is a little lie because What does a week or two matter? Then a missed week is two weeks, a month, two months, and another lie has to be formulated to cover the previous little lie, if only the chips HAD come in on time, then the first lie would not have mattered.

Despite that, I still believe in Ken and if you believe in Ken, I will sell you all 169,000 of my shares in ActM for 1218 bitcoin. This offer is open until a viable exchange is operating. Put your money where your faith is.

You just stand there, look pretty and don't say anything. Kiss

(<---Zumies, quit using drugs)

zumzero

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

myBitcoin.Garden

Quote from: LorenzoMoney on December 11, 2013, 02:45:51 PM

Zummikins,

No investor with Madoff was looking to get scammed. No one looks to get scammed. People had big eyes and dreams and ignore data.
We all wants to be the stuff of bitcoin legend having invested in a company that becomes wildly successful.
Active Mining is not a scam, but, at some point, even an honest man can panic when schedules are missed and he wants to save face. A little lie about deadline is a little lie because What does a week or two matter? Then a missed week is two weeks, a month, two months, and another lie has to be formulated to cover the previous little lie, if only the chips HAD come in on time, then the first lie would not have mattered.

Despite that, I still believe in Ken and if you believe in Ken, I will sell you all 169,000 of my shares in ActM for 1218 bitcoin. This offer is open until a viable exchange is operating. Put your money where your faith is.

You just stand there, look pretty and don't say anything. Kiss

zumzero

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

myBitcoin.Garden

@ crumbs

Your analogy is broken. There is no trust and therefor no investment opportunity with a 'guy at the bar', but there is ample with a Chief Executive Officer who has a business partnership with a leading North American company who has just hired a former Apple Executive to join the Board of Directors.

Implying I'm a child warrants no response and if your post was an attempt to 'educate' me, you get an E-. Go straight to bed and do not pass go and do not collect 200 bitcoins. Angry

LorenzoMoney

sr. member

Activity: 335

Merit: 250

Gains to be had by exaggerating customer orders:

1. It makes the reality that things are falling apart seem less real. It is a gentle white lie to save face.
2. It is like boasting, by exaggerating sales, everybody thinks you and the company are doing better, so there is an emotional ego gain.
3. It is hopeful thinking. By exaggerating sales, it is a way of saying, see, things could be good, and will be good.
4. It is a way of getting the doubters and self doubt to go away, exaggerating sales is a form of self deception to encourage oneself.

We could go one, four is enough.

Quote from: Stuartuk on December 11, 2013, 01:51:32 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

He has plenty to gain by exaggerating.

Name one gain to be had by exaggerating customer orders at this time.

Take your time...

SebastianJu

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 1083

Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile

Quote from: Ozymandias on December 10, 2013, 08:12:32 PM

I agree in that I also don't think ActM is a scam, but it's especially not a ponzi. A ponzi is built on paying a little out to encourage more to be put it (to the ponzi-runner's pocket), but not a dime has been collected since the latest IPO and in fact, money has been coming out and (according to the guarantee if we are to take it at face value) will continue coming out at least until the IPO funds are returned to the shareholders. I would be concerned if more money for the company was solicited (as then the ponzi definition would fit adequately well), but as far as I know, it hasn't been since July and there are no signs of it happening in the future. If this was a scam, then Ken would have been long gone by now.

I agree that its not like a ponzi. But you should think about your last sentence. I followed the same logic and find myself now in the situation helping to hunt down the labcoin scammer. He collected the bitcoins and scammed clearly. We have proof enough. So not disappearing instantly is not a proof in itself.

But like i said i think Ken is legit. At least i hope.

LorenzoMoney

sr. member

Activity: 335

Merit: 250

Zummikins,

No investor with Madoff was looking to get scammed. No one looks to get scammed. People had big eyes and dreams and ignore data.
We all wants to be the stuff of bitcoin legend having invested in a company that becomes wildly successful.
Active Mining is not a scam, but, at some point, even an honest man can panic when schedules are missed and he wants to save face. A little lie about deadline is a little lie because What does a week or two matter? Then a missed week is two weeks, a month, two months, and another lie has to be formulated to cover the previous little lie, if only the chips HAD come in on time, then the first lie would not have mattered.

Despite that, I still believe in Ken and if you believe in Ken, I will sell you all 169,000 of my shares in ActM for 1218 bitcoin. This offer is open until a viable exchange is operating. Put your money where your faith is.

Quote from: zumzero on December 11, 2013, 02:29:42 PM

@ pankkake

No investors are willing to be scammed, and fewer of them have a tendency to scam. People take on risks, and some are better at that than others.

Just because an investment is not risk free certainly doesn't mean it's a scam.

You have totally confused your figures if you genuinely believe that the risk that comes with an ActM investment outweighs the potential for high reward.

Stuartuk

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: Mabsark on December 11, 2013, 02:13:08 PM

You said:

Quote from: ?? on ??

3600BTC are generated every day, there is no speculation in that.

That's not a fact. The fact is, that 50,400 BTC are generated every round, whereas the amount generated daily is variable.

Averaged out yes it's a fact. Sorry if the finer detail was not explained - it is not atall relevant to the estimates being put forward. If you think it is relevant let us know why.

Quote from: Mabsark on December 11, 2013, 02:13:08 PM

Also, this:

Quote from: Stuartuk on December 11, 2013, 12:46:49 PM

We only need 40 of our 24.5TH/s miners to be deployed by the end of January to be on target for taking over 10% of network by end of 2014.

What makes you so certain that the network hash rate will only be 10 Ph/s by the end of January?

I didn't say it would be - not atall. I said quite clearly (you quoted it) that 40 miners would put us on target for 10%+ by end of 2014.
You should read my post from the other day for more detail. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3906211

So in summary you are wrong on both counts.

BTW Mabsark - where have you been? How did Labcoin go for you? Have you made your 1000BTC yet? Did the LC experience humble you or have you turned up here to cause trouble again and tell everyone how much you are going to make from trading BTC securities?

zumzero

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

myBitcoin.Garden

@ pankkake

No investors are willing to be scammed, and fewer of them have a tendency to scam. People take on risks, and some are better at that than others.

Just because an investment is not risk free certainly doesn't mean it's a scam.

You have totally confused your figures if you genuinely believe that the risk that comes with an ActM investment outweighs the potential for high reward.

Mabsark

legendary

Activity: 826

Merit: 1004

Quote from: zumzero on December 11, 2013, 01:29:39 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Stuartuk on December 11, 2013, 01:06:19 PM

...
There has been no attempt to misrepresent shipping dates to customers. Shipping dates are explained in full when customers place orders. Not a single customer has complained about missed shipping dates for any specific order - because no shipping dates have been missed. So that is lie number 2.
...

That's because there are no verifiable customers. For all you know, Ken's Active Mining is buying gear from Ken's Virtual Mining.
Oh, wait... You don't even know that, do you? You just took Ken's word for it Cheesy

Come back and tell us all about verifiable customers when we are shipping products using Intellihash. It will be a cold day in hell when you show your face in this thread.

IntelliHash - the DowloadMoreRAM of bitcoin ASICs.

Mabsark

legendary

Activity: 826

Merit: 1004

Quote from: Stuartuk on December 11, 2013, 01:06:19 PM

Edit - telling the truth isn't cheerleading. Misrepresenting the facts is cheerleading. Tell me one single fact that I have misrepresented. If there are none then I am just putting forth the facts - do you have a problem with someone putting forward the facts on the Official Thread?

You said:

Quote from: ?? on ??

3600BTC are generated every day, there is no speculation in that.

That's not a fact. The fact is, that 50,400 BTC are generated every round, whereas the amount generated daily is variable.

Also, this:

Quote from: Stuartuk on December 11, 2013, 12:46:49 PM

We only need 40 of our 24.5TH/s miners to be deployed by the end of January to be on target for taking over 10% of network by end of 2014.

which is quite clearly speculation and not fact. Speculation designed to lead people to think that ActM will perform better than it will.
Do you know how many chips that would take? Around 60,000. How many chips and miners have been sold? How many chips will be produced in the first batch? 40 x 24.5 Th/s miners is about 1 Ph/s. What makes you so certain that the network hash rate will only be 10 Ph/s by the end of January? That's only a 33% increase, whereas the network has increased by 78% in the past 30 days alone.

Stuartuk

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

So again your statements are proved to be lies - there is no substance behind your accusations today and there will be none tomorrow either.

Very poor show.

EDIT

This man wants ACtM shares.

ACtM holders, do not sell below 0.0025 because he WILL pay that and more for them.

Sell to him at 0.0025 and above - if you have to.

Stuartuk

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

He has plenty to gain by exaggerating.

Name one gain to be had by exaggerating customer orders at this time.

Take your time...

Stuartuk

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

Show me the receipts...

Do you see customer-order receipts from any listed company? No. It never happens.

What we do have is an Official News release which is a legal document.

If it was false Ken would be committing fraud and opening himself up to being prosecuted and imprisoned or fined.

Considering he has nothing to gain from exaggerating customer orders (as he is not issuing shares or raising funds) the likelihood that the statement about orders is false is almost zero. There is no benifit to lieing in this case but an immense ammount of risk.

Your next point please.

zumzero

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

myBitcoin.Garden

No it won't. Cheesy

zumzero

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

myBitcoin.Garden

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Stuartuk on December 11, 2013, 01:06:19 PM

...
There has been no attempt to misrepresent shipping dates to customers. Shipping dates are explained in full when customers place orders. Not a single customer has complained about missed shipping dates for any specific order - because no shipping dates have been missed. So that is lie number 2.
...

That's because there are no verifiable customers. For all you know, Ken's Active Mining is buying gear from Ken's Virtual Mining.
Oh, wait... You don't even know that, do you? You just took Ken's word for it Cheesy

Come back and tell us all about verifiable customers when we are shipping products using Intellihash. It will be a cold day in hell when you show your face in this thread.

Stuartuk

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

I suppose you are right. If there are no customers, there are no shipping dates given, and thus no lying could take place.
I believe you just had yourself a pyrrhic victory, Stuartuk. Let me be the first to congratulate you.

Absolutely - there is no evidence of customers apart from 2.1 Million USD in orders in November alone.

The 'victory' I had there was proving you both post brazen lies on here and when pushed to back up those statements you have nothing whatsoever to back up those lies.

Why are you two here again???

Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] - page 238. (Read 771288 times)