Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] - page 447. (Read 771542 times)
October 20, 2013, 07:21:59 PM
this thread has me breaking out the popcorn...
October 20, 2013, 05:13:49 PM
Have I missed any update on our klondikes? Last I recall the chips were delivered to Steamboat. Has there been any progress on that front?
I would also be very interested in hearing about our main project progress and would support ANY information (even if it's just tangentially related, such as our springfield underground data center being fully outfitted and ready just needing our miners to be plugged in).
October 20, 2013, 04:39:41 PM
I want to know if Ken is working on the October P&L and balance sheets. Fingers crossed we'll have some real numbers to crunch then.
Yes, we are working on those.
October 20, 2013, 04:26:55 PM
there is another 127 years until the last bitcoin is generated through mining.
Holy shit, so this bitching thread could have another 127 years in it? WTF! Too terrible to even think about.
October 20, 2013, 04:16:17 PM
I would hope we've had a boost in sales from the bloomberg article.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-15/bitcoin-mining-rush-means-real-cash-for-hardware-makers.html
There is a lot of doom and gloom around at the moment over mining with asics, but there is another 127 years until the last bitcoin is generated through mining.
As I see it, the sharp rise in difficulty seen today is only temporary and if we can keep afloat long enough then we are in with a real chance of capturing a significant percentage of the global hash rate.
It's a shame that we are infighting rather than being proactive and helping the company thrive.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-15/bitcoin-mining-rush-means-real-cash-for-hardware-makers.html
There is a lot of doom and gloom around at the moment over mining with asics, but there is another 127 years until the last bitcoin is generated through mining.
As I see it, the sharp rise in difficulty seen today is only temporary and if we can keep afloat long enough then we are in with a real chance of capturing a significant percentage of the global hash rate.
It's a shame that we are infighting rather than being proactive and helping the company thrive.
October 20, 2013, 04:13:52 PM
Jesus no way VE started that.
The first units will arrive in November. It's a short queue so there will not be BFL-style wait times. Production and delivery will be the fastest out of any competitors with the same schedule. I promise you that.
That was a month ago - 4 weeks. So what has caused this huge turn around? There must be more to this than VE getting tired waiting, he has got really personal with Ken. Something has gone on. Maybe VE asked to move his shares back from btc-tc to BF but Ken refused? Who knows, but that is weird.
Delivery is when? 3 months from now?
The first units will arrive in November. It's a short queue so there will not be BFL-style wait times. Production and delivery will be the fastest out of any competitors with the same schedule. I promise you that.
That was a month ago - 4 weeks. So what has caused this huge turn around? There must be more to this than VE getting tired waiting, he has got really personal with Ken. Something has gone on. Maybe VE asked to move his shares back from btc-tc to BF but Ken refused? Who knows, but that is weird.
October 20, 2013, 04:06:44 PM
October sales will probably be less than September because the eASIC release was likely driving those sales, combined with listing on The Genesis Block.
Excellent point actually. So we need another eASIC press release or like you say some PR. Whatever happened to everyone going around spreading the word about ACtM?? Wasn't there a thread put up somewhere? What else can we do over the next month to drive up sales? Come on guys THINK.
Investors should not have to be the ones doing the PR... advertising to make this a success is a responsibility from the company to the shareholders.
October 20, 2013, 03:50:32 PM
October sales will probably be less than September because the eASIC release was likely driving those sales, combined with listing on The Genesis Block.
Excellent point actually. So we need another eASIC press release or like you say some PR. Whatever happened to everyone going around spreading the word about ACtM?? Wasn't there a thread put up somewhere? What else can we do over the next month to drive up sales? Come on guys THINK.
another edit---
Brainwave:
Banksy is in the US right now. I know someone who knows someone who went to Bristol and saw one of his paintings once. Does any other UK guy here have his number? He is total counter-culture, he would be so up for a bit of 'Banksy does Bitcoin' graffiti.
October 20, 2013, 03:47:33 PM
From what I read here the other day I think that is going to happen, hasn't he been updating the figures ad-hoc each month? I guess we wait and see but obviously with the difficulty going up the sales MAY dry up a bit. People will obviously be worried about ROI.
edit---
In other words lets not see lower sales in Oct as a really bad sign and have a bloody big crisis about it. Lets expect the worst and it might not be that bad.
So I am predicting $120 of sales for October. Anyone else?
October sales will probably be less than September because the eASIC release was likely driving those sales, combined with listing on The Genesis Block. For increased sales there would need to be more PR, and that has been lacking. edit---
In other words lets not see lower sales in Oct as a really bad sign and have a bloody big crisis about it. Lets expect the worst and it might not be that bad.
So I am predicting $120 of sales for October. Anyone else?
P&L Statement is supposed to be released by Nov. 1 IIRC. Maybe we'll find out more about sample chips then... they should be arriving any day now.
October 20, 2013, 03:44:05 PM
You are making some rash assumptions
Whatever I assume here is by the by. You are assuming this will go no further - now that could have terrible consequences for you, your job, and your family.
Now THIS is a threat.
You can clearly see it is a warning about legal action which is why I told him to seek legal council and posted a link to a legal representative who will assist him.
I can clearly see it as a threat against him & his family.
October 20, 2013, 03:40:10 PM
From what I read here the other day I think that is going to happen, hasn't he been updating the figures ad-hoc each month? I guess we wait and see but obviously with the difficulty going up the sales MAY dry up a bit. People will obviously be worried about ROI.
edit---
In other words lets not see lower sales in Oct as a really bad sign and have a bloody big crisis about it. Lets expect the worst and it might not be that bad.
So I am predicting $120 of sales for October. Anyone else?
edit---
In other words lets not see lower sales in Oct as a really bad sign and have a bloody big crisis about it. Lets expect the worst and it might not be that bad.
So I am predicting $120 of sales for October. Anyone else?
October 20, 2013, 03:37:53 PM
I want to know if Ken is working on the October P&L and balance sheets. Fingers crossed we'll have some real numbers to crunch then.
October 20, 2013, 03:34:26 PM
http://www.danieljensenlaw.com/articles/death-threats/
Issuing a death threat is not just irresponsible; it is also illegal and punishable by jail time. If you have been accused of sending a death threat, you should take those charges seriously.
Issuing a death threat is not just irresponsible; it is also illegal and punishable by jail time. If you have been accused of sending a death threat, you should take those charges seriously.
If you can find where I made a threat, I will post a video of myself eating my own balls before they arrest me.
http://www.justice.gov/olc/
Do a search here for 'I made a death threat' lol
October 20, 2013, 03:33:05 PM
Try 3 pages back for the threat. It shouldn't be repeated here. I think the lawyers will be onto this. DESPICABLE.
October 20, 2013, 03:30:30 PM
You are making some rash assumptions
Whatever I assume here is by the by. You are assuming this will go no further - now that could have terrible consequences for you, your job, and your family.
Now THIS is a threat.
You can clearly see it is a warning about legal action which is why I told him to seek legal council and posted a link to a legal representative who will assist him.
October 20, 2013, 03:28:41 PM
You are making some rash assumptions
Whatever I assume here is by the by. You are assuming this will go no further - now that could have terrible consequences for you, your job, and your family.
Now THIS is a threat.
Doesn't bother me one bit.. can we focus on eASIC chips now? Or are we going to keep talking about internet threats and worthless share transfers?
October 20, 2013, 03:26:23 PM
You are making some rash assumptions
Whatever I assume here is by the by. You are assuming this will go no further - now that could have terrible consequences for you, your job, and your family.
Now THIS is a threat.
October 20, 2013, 03:26:18 PM
Do you want him to post Ken's address? Why are you inciting him?
You know from what I've read that I do not want him to post anyones address, or threaten to shoot, maime or kill anyone.
Nor do I wish him to encourage others to shoot anyone.
Nor do I wish him to implant the idea of shooting anyone in the minds of impressionable investors who may think the CEO is to blame in some way for their loss - when he clearly is not.
October 20, 2013, 03:25:09 PM
http://www.danieljensenlaw.com/articles/death-threats/
Issuing a death threat is not just irresponsible; it is also illegal and punishable by jail time. If you have been accused of sending a death threat, you should take those charges seriously.
In addition, the law does not distinguish between threats issued vocally and those in writing. Electronic communication makes no difference either, with an email having the same significance as a letter. The law does not take context into consideration, either. Even if not meant seriously, joke threats are still taken seriously by the law if the person receiving it feels threatened.
Issuing a death threat is not just irresponsible; it is also illegal and punishable by jail time. If you have been accused of sending a death threat, you should take those charges seriously.
In addition, the law does not distinguish between threats issued vocally and those in writing. Electronic communication makes no difference either, with an email having the same significance as a letter. The law does not take context into consideration, either. Even if not meant seriously, joke threats are still taken seriously by the law if the person receiving it feels threatened.
There was no threat made, in jest or otherwise. You're either clinically paranoid or a drama junkie.
Now stfu
October 20, 2013, 03:23:38 PM
You are making some rash assumptions
Whatever I assume here is by the by. You are assuming this will go no further - now that could have terrible consequences for you, your job, and your family.
Jump to: