You are making some rash assumptions
Whatever I assume here is by the by. You are assuming this will go no further - now that could have terrible consequences for you, your job, and your family.
Now THIS is a threat.
Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] - page 448. (Read 771302 times)
October 20, 2013, 03:26:23 PM
Whatever I assume here is by the by. You are assuming this will go no further - now that could have terrible consequences for you, your job, and your family.
Now THIS is a threat.
October 20, 2013, 03:26:18 PM
Do you want him to post Ken's address? Why are you inciting him?
You know from what I've read that I do not want him to post anyones address, or threaten to shoot, maime or kill anyone.
Nor do I wish him to encourage others to shoot anyone.
Nor do I wish him to implant the idea of shooting anyone in the minds of impressionable investors who may think the CEO is to blame in some way for their loss - when he clearly is not.
October 20, 2013, 03:25:09 PM
http://www.danieljensenlaw.com/articles/death-threats/
Issuing a death threat is not just irresponsible; it is also illegal and punishable by jail time. If you have been accused of sending a death threat, you should take those charges seriously.
In addition, the law does not distinguish between threats issued vocally and those in writing. Electronic communication makes no difference either, with an email having the same significance as a letter. The law does not take context into consideration, either. Even if not meant seriously, joke threats are still taken seriously by the law if the person receiving it feels threatened.
Issuing a death threat is not just irresponsible; it is also illegal and punishable by jail time. If you have been accused of sending a death threat, you should take those charges seriously.
In addition, the law does not distinguish between threats issued vocally and those in writing. Electronic communication makes no difference either, with an email having the same significance as a letter. The law does not take context into consideration, either. Even if not meant seriously, joke threats are still taken seriously by the law if the person receiving it feels threatened.
There was no threat made, in jest or otherwise. You're either clinically paranoid or a drama junkie.
Now stfu
October 20, 2013, 03:23:38 PM
You are making some rash assumptions
Whatever I assume here is by the by. You are assuming this will go no further - now that could have terrible consequences for you, your job, and your family.
October 20, 2013, 03:22:46 PM
wtf? There was nothing criminal about what I said. I was hoping he can run faster than a bullet because someone ELSE might not enjoy getting raped as much as the rest of us. Get it?
And are you going to supply Ken's address to these people who might want to shoot him? You have his address right?
No, I don't.
It's been on this forum several months ago when you were around - his home address.
And his business address is readily available. So you are claiming to know neither?
So what do you know about this company? You are the self-proclaimed expert on ACtM yet you don't know these basics. Do you think a judge would believe that because I don't.
Do you want him to post Ken's address? Why are you inciting him?
October 20, 2013, 03:22:08 PM
http://www.danieljensenlaw.com/articles/death-threats/
Issuing a death threat is not just irresponsible; it is also illegal and punishable by jail time. If you have been accused of sending a death threat, you should take those charges seriously.
Issuing a death threat is not just irresponsible; it is also illegal and punishable by jail time. If you have been accused of sending a death threat, you should take those charges seriously.
If you can find where I made a threat, I will post a video of myself eating my own balls before they arrest me.
October 20, 2013, 03:21:25 PM
wtf? There was nothing criminal about what I said. I was hoping he can run faster than a bullet because someone ELSE might not enjoy getting raped as much as the rest of us. Get it?
And are you going to supply Ken's address to these people who might want to shoot him? You have his address right?
No, I don't.
It's been on this forum several months ago when you were around - his home address.
And his business address is readily available. So you are claiming to know neither?
So what do you know about this company? You are the self-proclaimed expert on ACtM yet you don't know these basics. Do you think a judge would believe that because I don't.
I prefer to focus my knowledge on the eASIC chips, rather than addresses. You are making some rash assumptions ..you would make a horrible judge.
October 20, 2013, 03:20:59 PM
http://www.danieljensenlaw.com/articles/death-threats/
Issuing a death threat is not just irresponsible; it is also illegal and punishable by jail time. If you have been accused of sending a death threat, you should take those charges seriously.
In addition, the law does not distinguish between threats issued vocally and those in writing. Electronic communication makes no difference either, with an email having the same significance as a letter. The law does not take context into consideration, either. Even if not meant seriously, joke threats are still taken seriously by the law if the person receiving it feels threatened.
Issuing a death threat is not just irresponsible; it is also illegal and punishable by jail time. If you have been accused of sending a death threat, you should take those charges seriously.
In addition, the law does not distinguish between threats issued vocally and those in writing. Electronic communication makes no difference either, with an email having the same significance as a letter. The law does not take context into consideration, either. Even if not meant seriously, joke threats are still taken seriously by the law if the person receiving it feels threatened.
October 20, 2013, 03:18:06 PM
wtf? There was nothing criminal about what I said. I was hoping he can run faster than a bullet because someone ELSE might not enjoy getting raped as much as the rest of us. Get it?
And are you going to supply Ken's address to these people who might want to shoot him? You have his address right?
No, I don't.
It's been on this forum several months ago when you were around - his home address.
And his business address is readily available. So you are claiming to know neither?
So what do you know about this company? You are the self-proclaimed expert on ACtM yet you don't know these basics. Do you think a judge would believe that because I don't.
October 20, 2013, 03:15:00 PM
wtf? There was nothing criminal about what I said. I was hoping he can run faster than a bullet because someone ELSE might not enjoy getting raped as much as the rest of us. Get it?
And are you going to supply Ken's address to these people who might want to shoot him? You have his address right?
No, I don't.
October 20, 2013, 03:13:30 PM
wtf? There was nothing criminal about what I said. I was hoping he can run faster than a bullet because someone ELSE might not enjoy getting raped as much as the rest of us. Get it?
And are you going to supply Ken's address to these people who might want to shoot him? You have his address right?
October 20, 2013, 03:11:52 PM
Are USA people supposed to sell and rebuy? If so, there needs to be a bid wall at .1. Otherwise, we are taking losses just to move shares to cryptostocks. Or do we wait for Ukyo to push the shares back to the issuer account and you will reissue them?
I am interested in this as well. I have a good amount of shares on BitFunder and i am in the US. What will happen from here on out if i hold my shares?
We will be announcing a solution for users to transfer their shares to an account on Bitfunder for us to hold and for the shares to receive dividends. This will be before Ukyo pushes the shares back to the issuer account. We are trying to be pro-active to help our Investors.
Will you also be announcing a solution for people who want their BF shares to be converted into CryptoStocks shares?
Stop asking questions about worthless shares already. It gives Ken something to sidetrack about. Shareholders want to know what is going on with the actual operations of the company, and the eASIC chips. Without this, shares are worth nothing whether they are on BF or CryptoStocks
October 20, 2013, 03:05:44 PM
Are USA people supposed to sell and rebuy? If so, there needs to be a bid wall at .1. Otherwise, we are taking losses just to move shares to cryptostocks. Or do we wait for Ukyo to push the shares back to the issuer account and you will reissue them?
I am interested in this as well. I have a good amount of shares on BitFunder and i am in the US. What will happen from here on out if i hold my shares?
We will be announcing a solution for users to transfer their shares to an account on Bitfunder for us to hold and for the shares to receive dividends. This will be before Ukyo pushes the shares back to the issuer account. We are trying to be pro-active to help our Investors.
Will you also be announcing a solution for people who want their BF shares to be converted into CryptoStocks shares?
October 20, 2013, 03:02:31 PM
Personally I wouldn't mind if Ken just deleted the last couple pages ... (including this post, go ahead!)
October 20, 2013, 02:56:20 PM
And you think it's acceptable for members to threaten to shoot people whose identities and addresses are public knowledge?
Don't patronise me with your 'wtf dudes' attitude.
This is criminal behaviour and as such should be reported to the authorities.
Don't patronise me with your 'wtf dudes' attitude.
This is criminal behaviour and as such should be reported to the authorities.
Are you his lawyer, bodyguard, pet rock, what?
In the age where people are being prosecuted and imprisoned for using unacceptable language on Twitter, I assure you the comment made earlier today by VE is criminal.
wtf? There was nothing criminal about what I said. I was hoping he can run faster than a bullet because someone ELSE might not enjoy getting raped as much as the rest of us. Get it?
October 20, 2013, 02:50:47 PM
And you think it's acceptable for members to threaten to shoot people whose identities and addresses are public knowledge?
Don't patronise me with your 'wtf dudes' attitude.
This is criminal behaviour and as such should be reported to the authorities.
Don't patronise me with your 'wtf dudes' attitude.
This is criminal behaviour and as such should be reported to the authorities.
Are you his lawyer, bodyguard, pet rock, what?
In the age where people are being prosecuted and imprisoned for using unacceptable language on Twitter, I assure you the comment made earlier today by VE is criminal.
October 20, 2013, 02:50:09 PM
I DIG how all these noobs in here with join dates like July 2013 are so experienced with "manning up" about bitcoin related securities.
really puts the C in confidence...
really puts the C in confidence...
It doesn't matter when I started posting. For you to look at that as in indicator in your confidence shows that you pay attention to all the wrong things. You can't whine, bitch, and moan when you don't get your way after you invested in a fortune 500 company. Why do you think this is any different? Because you used your precious bitcoin, it entitles you to constant updates from the CEO? Get out of here.
The CEO is online now, and has plenty of time to delete posts in this thread, his last post was agreeing with me that he probably wouldn't do any time.
Responding to real concerns? No time 4 that.
that was disgusting of him actually. he may not do time but can he run faster than a bullet?
1) It's not disgusting atall to delete a Troll post in a moderated thread. It's what moderated threads are for. You imbecile.
2) You just made a death threat against an individual who's home and business address is known to you. You had better contact a lawyer. You imbecile.
October 20, 2013, 02:47:20 PM
And you think it's acceptable for members to threaten to shoot people whose identities and addresses are public knowledge?
Don't patronise me with your 'wtf dudes' attitude.
This is criminal behaviour and as such should be reported to the authorities.
Don't patronise me with your 'wtf dudes' attitude.
This is criminal behaviour and as such should be reported to the authorities.
Are you his lawyer, bodyguard, pet rock, what?
October 20, 2013, 02:43:21 PM
And you think it's acceptable for members to threaten to shoot people whose identities and addresses are public knowledge?
Don't patronise me with your 'wtf dudes' attitude.
This is criminal behaviour and as such should be reported to the authorities.
I suggest you pm me.
Don't patronise me with your 'wtf dudes' attitude.
This is criminal behaviour and as such should be reported to the authorities.
I suggest you pm me.
Jump to: