Topic: Advertise Bitcoin? Centralization has its benefits. - page 2. (Read 1779 times)

I find it hard to see bitcoin users parting with their beloved coins in order to simply fund a campaign. I also see people doubting the full usage of all their donations towards advertising assuming some of the coins might be pocketed. But on the flip side I think a better idea is people trying to find ways to introduce local businesses to coins, as once that begins to spread the idea of brick and mortar stores adopting bitcoins will become more realistic.

Oh, I thought you meant the government did it. That's really great. Sounds like finance is as important to people in the UK as it is to us. It might be worth it to get some of the UK businesses to donate to a campaign then.

It wasn't the government advertising.  A group of people were fed up with the church getting recognition in government, when few people attend church anymore. They raised a lot of money for adverts.

Anyway, I dont know about other countries, but people in the UK are seriously fed up with the banks, and the rich bankers.  So an advertising campaign to get Brits interested in Bitcoin, could pay for itself in extra trade volume.

"Hit the bankers where it hurts..... use Bitcoin"

Interesting, governments do advertise on occasion. Usually their advertising is free because someone calls a press conference.

I propose having a trusted dev or other community member (BitPay possibly) control and transfer the funds in fiat to a media outlet to pay for the adverts.

Sounds like a good idea to me.  In the UK there was in internet campaign to put banners on buses telling everyone that it was ok to put "No Religion" on the Census form, rather than put the cultural default of Church of England.

It was successful, and got a lot of media attention.

On the news today, there was yet another banking scandal.  Us Brits are fed up with banks.

Ok, most of the big publicity Bitcoin gets is negative. So why not drum up some positive publicity? A few mBTC from each person would be enough for at least some minor adverts. If computer illiterate people can't use it Bitcoin business steps in and fixes that.

No, they shut up and hope no one notices.
If someone notices, they shut up and hope that nobody cares.
If enough people get angry, then they might try to appease them.

There is enough publicity. Friggin MSM networks even keep reporting on it.
Drawing more computer-illiterate people in with ads is only going to lead them to getting scammed and more lobbying for regulations.

Right, that's what I'm thinking too. If a major financial business decided to copy the Bitcoin concepts like JPM is attempting to do. They would advertise it to death in order to kill mainstream support for Bitcoin and create users for their financial transfer system. Governments don't always advertise. They do but usually as a "public service". I think counterpoint type advertising could help Bitcoin but it can't be done because we don't have a marketing department.

I think you're a bit off. There aren't advertisements and marketing committees for all "closed source centrally controlled financial institutions." Some of them, yes, but not for the actual currency and commodity, yes?

You're comparing bitcoin to one facet/version of that. You also compare it to a business, which is news to me - doesn't seem like apples to apples comparison.

Feel free to start your own effort, I just don't see how much traction you could possibly get being the foundation outside of the major foundation that steers the actual software/protocol ... best case scenario is you get the 'major players' involved and its just the marketing arm of TBF, essentially adding a useless layer to TBF. I think part of the allure to bitcoin is that there is no central outreach effort, and just people supporting it are getting the message out and the quality messages float to the top.


There is no "should" regarding communication of the media networks. TBF nor anyone else 'owns' bitcoin as 'their business,' tinfoil hat theories aside, and we've seen plenty of alleged scammers and self-proclaimed experts spewing shit out of their mouth at the media.

I started thinking about the true differences between a closed source centrally controlled financial network and Bitcoin. To me, Bitcoin is superior in almost every way that I can think of except one. Having no single entity or board of directors in charge prohibits certain corporate departments that most businesses rely on to increase market share. The Bitcoin Foundation attempts to fill the gap between decentralization and corporate enterprise but falls far short of the mark. Even within the collective group of Bitcoin supporters their is no consensus of exactly what actions should be performed by TBF. Democracy is no way to run a business.

Main stream advertising is the big thing that I see naturally missing from the Bitcoin equation. All businesses have failures. All businesses lose money, have employee fraud, are robbed, lose product or fail to deliver on time occasionally. The difference is when that happens they advertise the problem away and bombard the public with positives about the product or service in an attempt to erase the recent negatives.

My questions are:

Can we come up with the funding for a real ad campaign using national media in key countries through donations alone?

If it's possible to fund the ad campaign would it also be possible to debate the content of an ad campaign in a democratic system and successfully pick something to present in a 30 second ad?

Do you think presenting the positives in a prime time TV sound bite on national media would make a difference in the user base?

Should TBF be the organization that communicates with the media networks or should it be an independent elected council devoted to advertising?

What should be the primary media focus? Television commercials? Movie theater previews? Billboards?

Which country to start advertising in (which one will have the most impact compared to the costs of advertising)?

What is our target audience (the time you send a message, and the channel you transmit on matter with price and target audience)?

What is the real cost of advertising?

What will we say in the advertisements to draw attention to people, dispel myths and change opinions?

Can we use the existing websites or do we need something new based on the ad campaign? More simplistic? Aimed at a group of users?