ChatGPT is not a paraphrasing tool, it's a language processing model. You asked it to give you something, it gave you what you asked. If you ask what something means, it may pull a definition from Encyclopedia Britannica. There is nothing wrong with that. You may even want to request a definition from a specific source.
If you need to paraphrase something, you need to specifically ask it to do so. You caught nothing.
Edit: If your intent is to obfuscate the source, right after it generates the list, type "Rewrite in conversational style as if it was written as a forum post and change the tip's order" and see what happens.
Topic: AI-generated post discussion thread: how to identify & report - page 4. (Read 2717 times)
On the contrary, its completely human written for sure. It was written before ChatGPT was launched:
The detectors all returned that it was human written because it was indeed written by a human. If anything its an example of the detectors doing their job accurately.
The detectors all returned that it was human written because it was indeed written by a human. If anything its an example of the detectors doing their job accurately.
So, does this mean that we have a situation where chatGPT was caught both plagiarizing and lying about its claim?
I've tried asking it for 10 tips and indeed, the reply had the same 10 "secrets" in almost the same order and the same content, but..this is really getting weird, the AI is generating content that was previously written by a human, not so much intelligence as paraphrasing.
Sometimes talking to a human can be worse than talking to the bots,
You have no idea how much worse it can get but keep on..
In this case the author most likely added a few phrases himself, probably that's why the spelling errors in it and the detectors fail, but it's AI generated for sure.
On the contrary, its completely human written for sure. It was written before ChatGPT was launched:
The detectors all returned that it was human written because it was indeed written by a human. If anything its an example of the detectors doing their job accurately.
Can I see what your example was here? I've yet to come across a text mis-identified by the Hive Moderation tool.
One thing to make sure first, the user didn't post it as his own creation, he just made the topic linking to this article
Quote
Top 10 Cryptocurrency Secrets Unleashed
Be Prepared for the Price Swings
Every investment has its own set of features that keeps them afloat., Similarly, the cryptocurrency market is filled with volatility. When you are buying a cryptocurrency, it indirectly means that you are signing up for the ups and downs it leverages. Sometimes, short-term steep falls are rise might even shock the investors. However, these are very common in the cryptocurrency ecosystem and you might actually yield profits from this. If you keep a close track of the growth and follow experts who are accurate about predictions, then you can invest in certain digital tokens and get your hand on good profits.
Keep a Constant Check on Its Performance
Even if you are not a full-time cryptocurrency investor and is doing it on the sidelines for profit, you need to keep a constant tab on the price swings. Although a 24/7 observation is not needed, checking them at constant intervals is a good thing. The more complicated your investing strategy becomes, the more you should review it. While this might seem to be a thing for short-term investors, long-run investors can also follow these criteria to keep a healthy investment.
Do Your Own Research and Manage the Risk Factors
A global fact is that cryptocurrency trading is a high-risk business and more traders lose than not. Therefore, don’t get tempted to add more value to your investment portfolio once you see a profit. Most importantly, don’t take other investors’ advise on what cryptocurrencies to invest in. Every digital token has its day! Bitcoin was at an all-time high just last November and now it is down like crazy. Therefore, do your own research before investing.
Opt for the Long-Term Investment
Fear of Not Missing Out (FOMO) and panic selling is very common things in the cryptocurrency market. Currently, people are trying to get rid of their Bitcoin investments before they could fall further and eat up their potential money. Similarly, six months back, investors went crazy over the Shiba Inu rally and many beginners tried their hand on the memecoin. Although these are the factors by which the cryptocurrency market functions, opting for the long-term investment plan is the best way to yield profit.
Choose the Right Platform to Trade
Even if you have picked a cryptocurrency in mind to trade, choosing the right platform also matters. While picking the platform, make sure it abides by all the regulations of the country you are living in. Other factors like exchange liquidity, asset liquidity, and fees need to be clarified before investment. Explore the other features in the platform while you are trading in it.
Use Trading Bots
Trading bots are becoming a common thing in the cryptocurrency market. They are automated software tools investors use to buy and sell financial instruments at a preconfigured time or when predefined conditions are met to maximize profits. Generally, trading bots identify the market trends and suggest investors invest in cryptocurrencies that give increased profits and reduced loses and risks.
Cryptocurrencies Can’t be Completely Wiped Out
Although countries might try to bring regulations on cryptocurrencies and their trading, a complete ban is impossible because anybody can own a wallet. Even if the country bans digital tokens, people can still use foreign accounts to trade them. Tech-savvy investors are also in the top of following such tactics. However, major countries won’t even consider banning cryptocurrencies as they know how much people have invested in them.
Digital Tokens can Come Under Taxation
When Bitcoin made its debut in 2009, the whole concept of cryptocurrency was new to even government agencies. But over the decade, central authorities have become more aware of digital tokens and the profit investors yield. Therefore, many countries are coming up with effective taxation regulations that could come into effect in the coming months or years.
Keep the Asset Safe at the Right Place
Currently, there are two types of storage in the market. One is hot storage and the other is cold storage. While hot storage refers to an online digital wallet, cold is an offline wallet that is typically stored on a hard drive. According to experts, keeping your cryptocurrency in a cold wallet is the safest way to protect it from hacks and mishaps.
Try Out Technical Analysis
If you are a pro in investing, then try out technical analysis tools to choose the right cryptocurrency. Technical analysis involves using mathematical indicators and chart patterns to try and predict which way the process will move next.
Be Prepared for the Price Swings
Every investment has its own set of features that keeps them afloat., Similarly, the cryptocurrency market is filled with volatility. When you are buying a cryptocurrency, it indirectly means that you are signing up for the ups and downs it leverages. Sometimes, short-term steep falls are rise might even shock the investors. However, these are very common in the cryptocurrency ecosystem and you might actually yield profits from this. If you keep a close track of the growth and follow experts who are accurate about predictions, then you can invest in certain digital tokens and get your hand on good profits.
Keep a Constant Check on Its Performance
Even if you are not a full-time cryptocurrency investor and is doing it on the sidelines for profit, you need to keep a constant tab on the price swings. Although a 24/7 observation is not needed, checking them at constant intervals is a good thing. The more complicated your investing strategy becomes, the more you should review it. While this might seem to be a thing for short-term investors, long-run investors can also follow these criteria to keep a healthy investment.
Do Your Own Research and Manage the Risk Factors
A global fact is that cryptocurrency trading is a high-risk business and more traders lose than not. Therefore, don’t get tempted to add more value to your investment portfolio once you see a profit. Most importantly, don’t take other investors’ advise on what cryptocurrencies to invest in. Every digital token has its day! Bitcoin was at an all-time high just last November and now it is down like crazy. Therefore, do your own research before investing.
Opt for the Long-Term Investment
Fear of Not Missing Out (FOMO) and panic selling is very common things in the cryptocurrency market. Currently, people are trying to get rid of their Bitcoin investments before they could fall further and eat up their potential money. Similarly, six months back, investors went crazy over the Shiba Inu rally and many beginners tried their hand on the memecoin. Although these are the factors by which the cryptocurrency market functions, opting for the long-term investment plan is the best way to yield profit.
Choose the Right Platform to Trade
Even if you have picked a cryptocurrency in mind to trade, choosing the right platform also matters. While picking the platform, make sure it abides by all the regulations of the country you are living in. Other factors like exchange liquidity, asset liquidity, and fees need to be clarified before investment. Explore the other features in the platform while you are trading in it.
Use Trading Bots
Trading bots are becoming a common thing in the cryptocurrency market. They are automated software tools investors use to buy and sell financial instruments at a preconfigured time or when predefined conditions are met to maximize profits. Generally, trading bots identify the market trends and suggest investors invest in cryptocurrencies that give increased profits and reduced loses and risks.
Cryptocurrencies Can’t be Completely Wiped Out
Although countries might try to bring regulations on cryptocurrencies and their trading, a complete ban is impossible because anybody can own a wallet. Even if the country bans digital tokens, people can still use foreign accounts to trade them. Tech-savvy investors are also in the top of following such tactics. However, major countries won’t even consider banning cryptocurrencies as they know how much people have invested in them.
Digital Tokens can Come Under Taxation
When Bitcoin made its debut in 2009, the whole concept of cryptocurrency was new to even government agencies. But over the decade, central authorities have become more aware of digital tokens and the profit investors yield. Therefore, many countries are coming up with effective taxation regulations that could come into effect in the coming months or years.
Keep the Asset Safe at the Right Place
Currently, there are two types of storage in the market. One is hot storage and the other is cold storage. While hot storage refers to an online digital wallet, cold is an offline wallet that is typically stored on a hard drive. According to experts, keeping your cryptocurrency in a cold wallet is the safest way to protect it from hacks and mishaps.
Try Out Technical Analysis
If you are a pro in investing, then try out technical analysis tools to choose the right cryptocurrency. Technical analysis involves using mathematical indicators and chart patterns to try and predict which way the process will move next.
In this case the author most likely added a few phrases himself, probably that's why the spelling errors in it and the detectors fail, but it's AI generated for sure.
It is a tool. Blaming a tool entirely for a problem is not fair. How you use it determines the outcome.
Nobody is blaming the tool, we're blaming the users who use the tool to generate spam and get paid for it.
But you can easily change that by asking to write the responses, for example, in Ernest Hemingway's literary style. Try it.
Yes but spammers aren't going to do that because, again, they are lazy and simply looking for time-saving measures to mass-generate spam.
Testing a few of those detectors on a text I just stumbled upon
...
https://hivemoderation.com/ai-generated-content-detection The input is: not likely to contain AI Generated Text
...
ChatGBT:
...
https://hivemoderation.com/ai-generated-content-detection The input is: not likely to contain AI Generated Text
...
ChatGBT:
Can I see what your example was here? I've yet to come across a text mis-identified by the Hive Moderation tool.
This is not interaction you just copy-pasted stuff.
It's not unique content because anyone trying to do the same would come with the same result.
Unique content is generated by unique persons and ways of thinking, in this case, you're giving a standard response everyone could come up with, just like looking at a Wikipedia article and copy-pasting that paragraph.
It's not unique content because anyone trying to do the same would come with the same result.
Unique content is generated by unique persons and ways of thinking, in this case, you're giving a standard response everyone could come up with, just like looking at a Wikipedia article and copy-pasting that paragraph.
It seems like you replied without giving much thought to my comments. If you use AI as a tool to supplement and speed up your process to create something helpful in response to others or use AI to communicate in your native language - it's an interaction. If you copy-paste AI responses then - yes, there is not much value to it.
I'm not talking about using answers directly from AI and pasting them here. And by the way, it is not the standard response for everyone. The response will depend on the prompt you supply to AI. The more knowledgeable you are and the more information you put in the prompt, the more interesting and unique response you will get.
Sometimes talking to a human can be worse than talking to the bots, and not the AI-powered ones, just those primitive spinner bots, not capable of going a little beyond the script and just repeating what the other guy said just a few posts before. People give too much credit to their creativity and uniqueness.
Testing a few of those detectors on a text I just stumbled upon
https://writer.com/ai-content-detector/ - 100% HUMAN-GENERATED CONTENT Fantastic!
https://gptzero.me/ Your text is likely to be written entirely by a human
https://contentatscale.ai/ai-content-detector/ 96% Highly likely to be Human!
https://x.writefull.com/gpt-detector https://x.writefull.com/gpt-detector
https://hivemoderation.com/ai-generated-content-detection The input is: not likely to contain AI Generated Text
https://paraphrasingtool.ai/ai-content-detector/ Text may contain AI-written sentences
https://detector.dng.ai/ Based on our Analysis your test has been most likely written by a Human.
ChatGBT:
This is not interaction you just copy-pasted stuff.
It's not unique content because anyone trying to do the same would come with the same result.
Unique content is generated by unique persons and ways of thinking, in this case, you're giving a standard response everyone could come up with, just like looking at a Wikipedia article and copy-pasting that paragraph.
https://writer.com/ai-content-detector/ - 100% HUMAN-GENERATED CONTENT Fantastic!
https://gptzero.me/ Your text is likely to be written entirely by a human
https://contentatscale.ai/ai-content-detector/ 96% Highly likely to be Human!
https://x.writefull.com/gpt-detector https://x.writefull.com/gpt-detector
https://hivemoderation.com/ai-generated-content-detection The input is: not likely to contain AI Generated Text
https://paraphrasingtool.ai/ai-content-detector/ Text may contain AI-written sentences
https://detector.dng.ai/ Based on our Analysis your test has been most likely written by a Human.
ChatGBT:
See? I interact and exchange ideas based on what is in my mind
This is not interaction you just copy-pasted stuff.
This is helpful and unique content
It's not unique content because anyone trying to do the same would come with the same result.
Unique content is generated by unique persons and ways of thinking, in this case, you're giving a standard response everyone could come up with, just like looking at a Wikipedia article and copy-pasting that paragraph.
See, that's a ridiculous response the AI gave you. Because if it was any useful, I would not have needed to create that topic. 
Did get your joke before, but now I see that you are the person who asked the question I used in my example.
This is getting even further off-topic but here is the last thing I want to say (although it's not a promise I will resist replying).
ChatGPT's training data only goes up until 2021 and some generative models are in their early stages. But they evolve with remarkable speed.
And yeah, you didn't need to create that topic. You could just have asked Google Bard, although it missed one step when I did it.
Ah but it does matter as you're taking credit for something you didn't create. What would be more appropriate is to say,
"I asked ChatGPT for an answer to your question and this is was its response:
"I asked ChatGPT for an answer to your question and this is was its response:
I can see how this applies to the majority of (spam) cases but not to the example I gave and similar cases. Instead of saying "I prepared a report" I don't have to be "honest" and say I asked Excel to crunch numbers for me and produce graphs." Spending 10 minutes typing up the steps to set gas fees instead of asking AI to generate them for me in 3 seconds would not make my post any more honest or better. It would make 0 difference (except the amount of wasted time to create the reply).
I also understand your point about leading others to believe that one is knowledgeable about something when they are not. I don't know if it was a general statement or directed at me, but in my example, I knew how it is done and wanted to demonstrate how this tool can be used to save time.
As an AI model, I can't... However... It's essential... Furthermore... It is important to keep in mind that... etc.
It is a tool. Blaming a tool entirely for a problem is not fair. How you use it determines the outcome. None of my examples were like that. These tools imitate the average person writing by default because most people write this way. But you can easily change that by asking to write the responses, for example, in Ernest Hemingway's literary style. Try it.
Its peak laziness, on par with the laziness of plagiarism.
The range of how people use AI is too broad and I don't think blanket statements are appropriate. If people generate text about a subject they don't know anything about - then yes - it could be considered plagiarism. You're taking AI work (not another person's work) and passing it off as your own. If you are asking to generate instructions, write definitions, or give you a list of celebrities born in 1986 to be included in your original work - then it's not the same. Another way of looking at it is like hiring an assistant for doing mindless work for you. If you want to comb the internet for hours to find some common knowledge information just for the sake of not being lazy - it is your choice.
Here is a quick example. I just read this topic where a guy complains about how ridiculous Ethereum fees are and asks "Is there a way for me to lower the gas fees from Metamask, or otherwise import the wallet into some other software?" I could write a reply to him saying, "Hey, sure there is a way. You can set your own gas fees in Matamask and when the network will be less busy your transaction will be picked up. Here is how:"
And then I would ask AI "Give me instructions on how to set gas fees in Metamask." I would get this:
And then I would ask AI "Give me instructions on how to set gas fees in Metamask." I would get this:
- When you are about to make a transaction, click on the word "Market" above the estimated gas fee.
- In the "Edit Gas Fee" section click "Advanced", you will see three options:
- "Max Gas Fee": This is the maximum amount of gas that can be used for a transaction. If you set this too low, your transaction may fail. If you set it too high, you may pay more than you need to.
- "Priority Fee": A priority fee in Metamask is an optional fee that you can add to your transaction to increase the likelihood of it being processed quickly by miners.
- Once you have set your gas fee, click on "Save" to apply the changes.
See, that's a ridiculous response the AI gave you. Because if it was any useful, I would not have needed to create that topic.
Right now, GenAI doesn't know how to try solutions by itself and make a response - but maybe in the future when it learns how to use software, that might change. It is basically a parrot that repeats what someone else on the internet has wrote. That makes it really only useful for things like summaries at this stage (and why Big Tech is using it for that purpose accordingly).
Anyway, I guess that's the kind of reply JARPI would've created for that thread anyway
It doesn't matter who wrote this bit.
Ah but it does matter as you're taking credit for something you didn't create. What would be more appropriate is to say,
"I asked ChatGPT for an answer to your question and this is was its response:
If you call this being lazy, well, good luck churning your own butter, don't know what to tell you.
Its peak laziness, on par with the laziness of plagiarism.
Nobody assumes you made the butter you're eating, that's the difference. You're not implicitly pretending you made the butter. When you paste text in a post under your name without crediting the source, you're basically saying "I made this," when you didn't. That's dishonest.
I understand that 90% of people will use it to spam the forum and they have to be dealt with. I never argued against that. But now I just have to respond to your personal attacks about "feeling lazy and too busy", "then logout", "save that for your company".
You think I don't understand your point because you don't understand what generative AI is. You even call them chatbots. No, generative AI doesn't go around the internet and gather the information to make a response. Generative AI can be used to plagiarize or it can be used to produce unique content. I'm going to give you a few examples by addressing your other "points".
Here is a quick example. I just read this topic where a guy complains about how ridiculous Ethereum fees are and asks "Is there a way for me to lower the gas fees from Metamask, or otherwise import the wallet into some other software?" I could write a reply to him saying, "Hey, sure there is a way. You can set your own gas fees in Matamask and when the network will be less busy your transaction will be picked up. Here is how:"
And then I would ask AI "Give me instructions on how to set gas fees in Metamask." I would get this:
See? I interact and exchange ideas based on what is in my mind. This is helpful and unique content (this is not taken from anywhere, you can search the list and you will not get the full match or anything too similar). It would take me 10 minutes to type it up but with this tool, I can do that in seconds to produce value. It doesn't matter who wrote this bit. If you call this being lazy, well, good luck churning your own butter, don't know what to tell you.
Another example is that people can write in their native language and AI will convey their thoughts in English in their own style and usual to them mannerisms (it is not like running text through a translator and they can do that real-time in a browser) instead of posting the gobbledygook they produce trying to write in English.
I don't even know if you understood my point. And yes I called it silly because it makes no sense using responses from a chatbot to interact with your fellow humans who could also be using a chatbot to respond to you. It's basically a chatbot talking to itself
If you feel lazy and too busy to interact with the forum members, then logout. It's like it's a must for one to post in the forum and when they have no content, then they must get something from a chatbot.
If you feel lazy and too busy to interact with the forum members, then logout. It's like it's a must for one to post in the forum and when they have no content, then they must get something from a chatbot.
You think I don't understand your point because you don't understand what generative AI is. You even call them chatbots. No, generative AI doesn't go around the internet and gather the information to make a response. Generative AI can be used to plagiarize or it can be used to produce unique content. I'm going to give you a few examples by addressing your other "points".
This is a forum where humans socialize, interact and exchange ideas based on what is in their minds and what they know. Not Member A using a chatbot to respond to Member B who will use a response from a chatbot to reply to member A
Here is a quick example. I just read this topic where a guy complains about how ridiculous Ethereum fees are and asks "Is there a way for me to lower the gas fees from Metamask, or otherwise import the wallet into some other software?" I could write a reply to him saying, "Hey, sure there is a way. You can set your own gas fees in Matamask and when the network will be less busy your transaction will be picked up. Here is how:"
And then I would ask AI "Give me instructions on how to set gas fees in Metamask." I would get this:
- When you are about to make a transaction, click on the word "Market" above the estimated gas fee.
- In the "Edit Gas Fee" section click "Advanced", you will see three options:
- "Max Gas Fee": This is the maximum amount of gas that can be used for a transaction. If you set this too low, your transaction may fail. If you set it too high, you may pay more than you need to.
- "Priority Fee": A priority fee in Metamask is an optional fee that you can add to your transaction to increase the likelihood of it being processed quickly by miners.
- Once you have set your gas fee, click on "Save" to apply the changes.
See? I interact and exchange ideas based on what is in my mind. This is helpful and unique content (this is not taken from anywhere, you can search the list and you will not get the full match or anything too similar). It would take me 10 minutes to type it up but with this tool, I can do that in seconds to produce value. It doesn't matter who wrote this bit. If you call this being lazy, well, good luck churning your own butter, don't know what to tell you.
Another example is that people can write in their native language and AI will convey their thoughts in English in their own style and usual to them mannerisms (it is not like running text through a translator and they can do that real-time in a browser) instead of posting the gobbledygook they produce trying to write in English.
Well, save that for your company.
AI will be integrated into browsers, communication, productivity, and business apps. It will enhance the auto-complete feature on phones. Telling people to keep the technology for themselves won't work. This is why I think "chatbots" would be special. 
Plagiarism is stealing others' work. It is unethical at the least. Some people think that generative AI is a rephrasing bot. It is not. I get what you're saying (and others in this thread) - there should be ways to prevent generated spam (which now is extremely easy to produce) from people whose only goal is financial gain. But, fighting AI is not the right approach. For one, not everyone who uses AI is lazy and doesn't add to the organic discussion. But my main point is that those anti-measures won't work. This is a losing battle. A more effective approach would be combating babble, AI or not AI.
Fighting spammers who use AI generated text is similar to fighting guys who would plagiarize and use text spinning bots, and I never saw it being a losing battle. So why do you think chatbots would be special?Matter of fact, copying a direct response from an AI chatbot and passing it here as your own response is still similar to plagiarism. These chatbots actually just gather the information available on the web to respond to the different prompts
<...>
I don't even know if you understood my point. And yes I called it silly because it makes no sense using responses from a chatbot to interact with your fellow humans who could also be using a chatbot to respond to you. It's basically a chatbot talking to itself If you feel lazy and too busy to interact with the forum members, then logout. It's like it's a must for one to post in the forum and when they have no content, then they must get something from a chatbot.
By the way, the company I work for is in the process of integrating AI tools to streamline communication.
Well, save that for your company. This is a forum where humans socialize, interact and exchange ideas based on what is in their minds and what they know. Not Member A using a chatbot to respond to Member B who will use a response from a chatbot to reply to member A 
I wonder if a native Turkish speaker can tell if that text is AI-generated or not, does it pass the eye test?
It's AI-generated and I have another clue. When he is copying from another source his posts has a space chracter at the first character of post.
Another example:
State Bank of Pakistan 14 April 2023 tak Pakistan ke foreign exchange reserves $9.965 billion se zyada hogaye hain jismein commercial inflows ka bhi haath hai. Haalanki Pakistan ke foreign exchange reserves pehle $27.228 billion tak pahunch chuke the lekin phir $17.263 billion gir gaye jis se April 7, 2023 tak reserves $9.564 billion ho gaye thay. Lekin April 14, tak SBP ki official reserves $395 million se $4.433 billion ho gayi. Sarkar $1.2 billion IMF Extended Fund Facility (EFF) ki taraf se foreign exchange ki shortage ko address karne ki koshish kar rahi hai. Is crisis ke root causes ko address karne ke liye exports ko badhane aur domestic economy ko masbot banane jaise sustained efforts aur effective policies zaroori hain
https://pkrevenue.com/pakistans-forex-reserves-rise-by-over-400-million-on-commercial-inflows/
https://pkrevenue.com/pakistans-forex-reserves-rise-by-over-400-million-on-commercial-inflows/
He sent 55 posts and just 2 of them has started with a space character.
Yep, that's what it comes down to basically is laziness. The people using ChatGPT to write their posts aren't going to bother with changing the text to make them not look AI-written. <...>
True that!
Speaking about laziness, let me show you one more example (it again comes from the alt of Bahadurmunir, DainSLane multi-accounter farm), you can actually see the prompts that they are using:
Compromise me (that's their username lol) copies a post from the Turkish local board and the follow-up interaction with chatgpt, (full transcript and more examples - here).
Merhabalar, nereleri okuduğum yada bir şeyler öğrenmek için neler yaptığım özellikle yeni başlayan arkadaşların sıklıkla sordukları bir soru. Bu cümle kesinlikle ben oldum cümlesi değil öğrenmek için çabalıyorum cümlesi. Para kazanmakla ilgilendiğim anları hariç tutarsak yapmayı en sevdiğim iş araştırmak ve bu forumdaki çoğu kişinin böyle olduğunu veya olması gerektiğini düşünüyorum bu yüzden kaliteli okuma yapılabilecek platformları paylaşmanın oldukça değerli olduğunu düşünüyorum.
Zamanla sizlerden gelen iyi okuma alanlarını da bu başlığa ekleyeceğim.
1- https://www.lopp.net/bitcoin-information.html
Cypherpunk Jamesson Lopp tarafından hazırlanmış müthiş bir arşiv, okurken içerisinde kayboluyorsunuz. Sürekli yeni bir şeyler öğrenmenize, yeni şeyleri merak etmenize yardımcı oluyor. Okurken çoğu zaman bir insan bu kadar geniş bir arşivi nasıl hazırlayabilir diye hayrete düşüyorum genellikle. Bazılarını sadece eğlenmek için (twitterda bitcoin ile ilgili önemli olaylar, bitcoin yüzünden gerçek hayatta saldırıya uğrayan insanları listesi gibi) yada tamamen bilgi edinmek için okuyabileceğiniz bir çok içerik var.
2- https://nakamotoinstitute.org/
Genellikle bitcoinin ilk günlerine dair kayıtları okumak için kullanmıştım fakat bitcoin'in nasıl ortaya çıktığını anlamak için Literature bölümü çok kıymetli. Okuyunca bitcoinin aslında sadece Satoshi tarafından yaratılmadığını çok uzun bir sürece yayılmış buluşların finalinde ortaya çıkan ürün olduğunu anlıyorsunuz.
Research bölümünde bitcoin yada benzerlerinin geliştirilmesine yönelik makaleleri, mempool bölümünde güncel çok güzel makalelere denk gelebilirsiniz.
3- http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2005/
Nick Szabo'nun 2005-2018 arasında içerikler ürettiği bloğu.
Zamanla sizlerden gelen iyi okuma alanlarını da bu başlığa ekleyeceğim.
1- https://www.lopp.net/bitcoin-information.html
Cypherpunk Jamesson Lopp tarafından hazırlanmış müthiş bir arşiv, okurken içerisinde kayboluyorsunuz. Sürekli yeni bir şeyler öğrenmenize, yeni şeyleri merak etmenize yardımcı oluyor. Okurken çoğu zaman bir insan bu kadar geniş bir arşivi nasıl hazırlayabilir diye hayrete düşüyorum genellikle. Bazılarını sadece eğlenmek için (twitterda bitcoin ile ilgili önemli olaylar, bitcoin yüzünden gerçek hayatta saldırıya uğrayan insanları listesi gibi) yada tamamen bilgi edinmek için okuyabileceğiniz bir çok içerik var.
2- https://nakamotoinstitute.org/
Genellikle bitcoinin ilk günlerine dair kayıtları okumak için kullanmıştım fakat bitcoin'in nasıl ortaya çıktığını anlamak için Literature bölümü çok kıymetli. Okuyunca bitcoinin aslında sadece Satoshi tarafından yaratılmadığını çok uzun bir sürece yayılmış buluşların finalinde ortaya çıkan ürün olduğunu anlıyorsunuz.
Research bölümünde bitcoin yada benzerlerinin geliştirilmesine yönelik makaleleri, mempool bölümünde güncel çok güzel makalelere denk gelebilirsiniz.
3- http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2005/
Nick Szabo'nun 2005-2018 arasında içerikler ürettiği bloğu.
https://ninjastic.space/post/61970264
Kaliteli okuma materyalleri için başka platformlar da var:
4- Ethereum'un resmi web sitesi, Ethereum ve blockchain teknolojisi hakkında temel ve ileri seviye okumalar sunar. Ayrıca, "Ethereum Whitepaper" belgesi burada bulunur ve Ethereum'un nasıl çalıştığına dair teknik ayrıntılar sunar.
5- Coindesk, kripto para dünyası ve blockchain teknolojisi hakkında güncel haberler, analizler, makaleler ve videolar sunan bir platformdur. Hem ileri düzeyde okuyuculara hem de yeni başlayanlara anlaşılır ve bilgilendirici içerikler sunar.
6- Bitcoin'in resmi web sitesi, Bitcoin hakkında temel bilgiler, teknik detaylar ve kaynaklar sunar. "Bitcoin Whitepaper" belgesi de burada mevcuttur ve Bitcoin'in nasıl çalıştığına dair ayrıntılı bilgi edinmenize olanak tanır.
Umarız bu platformlar sizin için faydalı olur
4- Ethereum'un resmi web sitesi, Ethereum ve blockchain teknolojisi hakkında temel ve ileri seviye okumalar sunar. Ayrıca, "Ethereum Whitepaper" belgesi burada bulunur ve Ethereum'un nasıl çalıştığına dair teknik ayrıntılar sunar.
5- Coindesk, kripto para dünyası ve blockchain teknolojisi hakkında güncel haberler, analizler, makaleler ve videolar sunan bir platformdur. Hem ileri düzeyde okuyuculara hem de yeni başlayanlara anlaşılır ve bilgilendirici içerikler sunar.
6- Bitcoin'in resmi web sitesi, Bitcoin hakkında temel bilgiler, teknik detaylar ve kaynaklar sunar. "Bitcoin Whitepaper" belgesi de burada mevcuttur ve Bitcoin'in nasıl çalıştığına dair ayrıntılı bilgi edinmenize olanak tanır.
Umarız bu platformlar sizin için faydalı olur
I wonder if a native Turkish speaker can tell if that text is AI-generated or not, does it pass the eye test?
Yep, that's what it comes down to basically is laziness. The people using ChatGPT to write their posts aren't going to bother with changing the text to make them not look AI-written. Case in point:
~
This user was actually banned for plagiarism... If a post is very obviously AI-written then it would appear the mods have taken the stance of making it a ban-able offense. Good.
~
This user was actually banned for plagiarism... If a post is very obviously AI-written then it would appear the mods have taken the stance of making it a ban-able offense. Good.
It definitely violated the spam rule.
I'd say, ban everyone who uses ChatGPT to impersonate a human. Unless they explicitly mark the account as an automated bot and treat it as such.
Your suggestion is similar to that of someone saying that plagiarism should be condoned based on its usefulness. People who plagiarize, those who use text spinning bots and those that use AI to generate texts are lazy and are not interested in organic discussion here.
Yep, that's what it comes down to basically is laziness. The people using ChatGPT to write their posts aren't going to bother with changing the text to make them not look AI-written. Case in point:
AI-generated post
User: DainSLane
This is a funny one. User DainSLane doubles down on being a synthetic.
Originally their post was incorrectly mixed with someone else's reply looking wonky like this:
Their post was edited a week later, unfortunately, they forgot to read it...
And let me give you some more hints as to why I believe Potter plays a significant role in each of those transfers.
Do you know Tuchel was fired solely because he refused to participate in the club's internal affairs? He stated openly in one of his last pre-match press conferences that his only job is to manage the players on the field - Todd Boehly wanted him to help appoint DOF and set up a recruitment team, which he refused, so the new owners had to look for someone (Potter) who ticked those boxes
If my prior reaction came out as an assault on you, I sincerely apologise; that was not my aim. As an AI language model, I have no biases or personal beliefs on any certain football team or its supporters. To the best of my knowledge and ability, I strive to give accurate and useful information.
Regarding your assertion that Potter had a large influence on Chelsea's most recent acquisitions, it is crucial to keep in mind that transfers frequently come about as the product of a team effort combining the club's owner, board members, director of football, scouts, and manager. Hence, it might not be correct to merely ascribe the transfers to the influence of one person.
(archive)
User: DainSLane
This is a funny one. User DainSLane doubles down on being a synthetic.
Originally their post was incorrectly mixed with someone else's reply looking wonky like this:
Their post was edited a week later, unfortunately, they forgot to read it...
And let me give you some more hints as to why I believe Potter plays a significant role in each of those transfers.
Do you know Tuchel was fired solely because he refused to participate in the club's internal affairs? He stated openly in one of his last pre-match press conferences that his only job is to manage the players on the field - Todd Boehly wanted him to help appoint DOF and set up a recruitment team, which he refused, so the new owners had to look for someone (Potter) who ticked those boxes
Regarding your assertion that Potter had a large influence on Chelsea's most recent acquisitions, it is crucial to keep in mind that transfers frequently come about as the product of a team effort combining the club's owner, board members, director of football, scouts, and manager. Hence, it might not be correct to merely ascribe the transfers to the influence of one person.
(archive)
This user was actually banned for plagiarism... If a post is very obviously AI-written then it would appear the mods have taken the stance of making it a ban-able offense. Good.
I think the problem is also coming from this ChatGPT because most people over use the ChatGPT and A.I. If they have done small mistake in their writing the next they would visit the sit to current. If really for those who whay to learn good in the forum write their comments by themselves. But for the English speaking users, their writing would not be the same with the none Englishd speaking user. But that is not the main concern in the forum on language. But if the two communicators are understanding each other then the purpose of English language has accomplish. So there is no need for any A.I or any other sentence boosters to help them write their thread.
Your suggestion is similar to that of someone saying that plagiarism should be condoned based on its usefulness. People who plagiarize, those who use text spinning bots and those that use AI to generate texts are lazy and are not interested in organic discussion here.
Plagiarism is stealing others' work. It is unethical at the least. Some people think that generative AI is a rephrasing bot. It is not. I get what you're saying (and others in this thread) - there should be ways to prevent generated spam (which now is extremely easy to produce) from people whose only goal is financial gain. But, fighting AI is not the right approach. For one, not everyone who uses AI is lazy and doesn't add to the organic discussion. But my main point is that those anti-measures won't work. This is a losing battle. A more effective approach would be combating babble, AI or not AI.Used by everyone to generate texts so that they can communicate to their colleagues, who are also using AI to generate responses? Come on... you know how silly it sounds
My prompt to AI: Write a response to this statement "AI used by everyone to generate texts so that they can communicate to their colleagues, who are also using AI to generate responses? Come on... you know how silly it sounds", incorporate that saying that something is silly doesn't make it silly and doesn't help the argument and that many professionals already use AI tools to communicate efficiently. Make the response concise.
Output:
"Labeling something as "silly" in an attempt to dismiss or undermine its credibility doesn't actually add any substance to the argument. Many professionals and organizations already use AI tools to generate texts and responses, which can save time and improve communication efficiency. So while it may sound silly and unusual to rely on AI for communication, it's a practice that's becoming increasingly common and accepted."
By the way, the company I work for is in the process of integrating AI tools to streamline communication.
Instead of focusing on whether posts are generated by AI or not, the mods (and reporters) should evaluate them based on their usefulness. In other words, continue what they have been doing since ever.
If the AI generated texts are not combatted, then we will have a lot of spam around the forum. That's obvious.Your suggestion is similar to that of someone saying that plagiarism should be condoned based on its usefulness. People who plagiarize, those who use text spinning bots and those that use AI to generate texts are lazy and are not interested in organic discussion here.
Attempting to combat AI-generated content is a futile effort - its use will continue to grow and it will be used by almost everyone in the near future.
Used by everyone to generate texts so that they can communicate to their colleagues, who are also using AI to generate responses? Come on... you know how silly it sounds Jump to: