Topic: AI Spam Report Reference Thread - page 45. (Read 24836 times)

Yes, I also send reports with a note that the text is written by an AI tool.
Notably, the first report showed the user several deleted posts, and he was flagged as an AI spammer. But the person did not understand, wrote me a question, what is the reason for deleting his posts, and after that, he continued to use AI.





He is currently inactive, and I don't know if he had a temporary ban or not. We'll check it out in a few days.

Here are the report results for the above examples, each post was reported as "AI spam":



Would they have been deleted without the additional link reference appended to each report? Hard to say. Just to make it clear what I'm putting in each report, it looks like this:



with the link being to the post that contains the results of the AI analysis.

---

I chose them for a few reasons:

- in my testing they seem to provide the most reliable results, although they're still not perfect
- they give a % as a result, which is more granular than something like "Your text is likely to be written entirely by AI"
- they are free of charge and don't require registration


gptzero.me seems to do a fairly good job but the problem is the results are hard to compare to analyzers that return percentages; same thing with platform.openai.com which additionally requires creation of an account

---

Also, for posts like these:


I don't think its necessary to run them through the analyzers -- hopefully the mod will see this giveaway text written in the post. I will, however, be using this post as a reference for a neutral feedback... not sure if I'm gonna do that for every account mentioned here but I might.

Some AI detectors.

https://contentdetector.ai/
https://writer.com/ai-content-detector/
https://contentatscale.ai/ai-content-detector/
https://x.writefull.com/gpt-detector
https://hivemoderation.com/ai-generated-content-detection
https://paraphrasingtool.ai/ai-content-detector/

@nutildah
Is there a particular reason you suggest using those AI detectors and not some others? Are they more likely to detect automated content compared with some competitors.
I wanted to suggest two more AI classifiers that can get the job done and don't require you to register an account, pay for the service, etc. If you have any comments on their quality, don't hesitate to speak up.

https://gptzero.me/
https://platform.openai.com/ai-text-classifier

Example #2:


Username: Sethrey

Post #1:


Hivemoderation: 89.1% likely to contain AI
Writer: 7% human


Post #2:


Hivemoderation: 99.9% likely to contain AI
Contentatscale: 11% human
Writer: 4% human


Post #3:


Hivemoderation: 99.1% likely to contain AI
Writer: 12% human

Post format example:


Username: cryptodude

Post #1:


Hivemoderation: 99.9% likely to contain AI
Writer: 28% human


Post #2:


Hivemoderation: 99.8% likely to contain AI
Contentatscale: 28% human


Post #3:


Hivemoderation: 99.9% likely to contain AI
Contentatscale: 25% human

This thread will serve as a repository for AI spam references in instances where posts written using AI (ChatGPT) cannot immediately be recognized as so.

The thread works like this:

When you wish to report a post as being "AI spam," particularly for posts that might not be explicit spam but still generated by AI, you can include a reference link in the report to your own post in this thread, which will contain results from AI detector analyses of the post. When adding an offending account to this thread for the first time, your post should include three or more examples of AI-generated posts by that account. Subsequently, each time the account makes an AI-generated post, those posts can be individually added to this thread, if necessary.

Here are the criteria that will be used to determine whether or not a post was either wholly or partially made using AI (as originally referenced in this thread):

• At least 2 of the 6 AI content detectors mentioned below must give a result of the post having a strong likelihood of containing AI-written material (with "strong likelihood" defined for each one):
  
  1. Hive Moderation* - 70% likely to contain AI generated text or above
  2. Writefull GPT Detector - 70% likely to come from GPT-3, GPT-4 or ChatGPT or above
  3. Writer AI Detector - 30% human-generated content or below
  4. Copyleaks AI Content Detector - 70% probability for AI or higher
  5. Contentatscale AI Detector - 30% likely to be human or below
  6. Sapling AI Detector - 70% Fake or above
  
  (Pay-to-use AI detectors have been excluded to keep verification accessible to all)

.

• There must be at least 3 posts by the account that meet the requirements specified in A. If its just a one-off or even two-off, the poster may deserve some leniency, but if they make a habit of it, their posts should be reported as "AI spam."

.

• Clues to help identify an AI poster before putting their posts through the detection process include:
  
  
  Quote from: nutildah on May 26, 2023, 09:34:56 PM
  - using perfect English & punctuation when the poster's previous posts did not
  - writing long texts in rapid succession, when it was unlikely to be possible manually
  - their posts are frequently riddled with phrases mentioned here.

This approach primarily reinforces reports concerning "AI written" or "AI spam" content. It also serves as a public means to highlight accounts engaging in such behavior, potentially discouraging others from doing so in the future.


*Note that if a post does not meet the minimum word/character count for analysis by a AI detection tool, you can simply repeat the post (double-paste) until it reaches it (this does not affect the quality of the analysis). Longer posts are of course better for this purpose.