Topic: All about bounty payments and its effect to the project - page 10. (Read 2133 times)
What else can we do? Bounty Hunter is impatient and immediately sells it at cheap prices. if they want to sell with other people, no one wants to buy and they say "it's better to sell in the market".
Every coin has different potential and not all coins are like that. Many coins that have a solid Team and when they enter the market the price is very good. Maybe we have to work hard to get a project like that. But your idea of paying bounty hunters using Ethereum is very good and there have been many projects like that.
But project team is ready to take that kind of risk that pay money from their pocket by trusting their project more,I don't think 99% of team won't do this that is why ICO related signature campaigns are now fully wiped of from bitcointalk.
I subscribe to this because it will go a long way to reduce the drop in price of tokens. Critically looking at it, prices of tokens drops as soon the bounty hunters are been paid. It is very few of them can hold a coin for a long time. They are always pessimistic about project prices.
I dont believe bounty hunters are to be held responsible for a drop in price of tokens or coins. In most cases distribution to investors both private and public happens way before the bounty hunter gets his or her share of that token, but you we still discover that the price has gone 60% below the ICO price and that says a lot about projects like that and has nothing to do with bounty hunters
Of course, a few percent of manufactured tokens, which are paid to bounty hunters, do not so much affect the decrease in price after listing on the stock exchange compared to the mass of tokens that investors throw into the market. Most of them, buying tokens at a discount of 40-50 percent, immediately sell them as soon as such an opportunity presents themselves and receive up to 200 percent of the profits. This is the main reason for the fall of the new token after entering the stock exchange.Sometimes ICO teams block tokens to bounty hunters in their wallets for a certain time, but this does not save the token from being lowered in price.
If the ICO team is so worried about the fall in the price of their token, they can pay bounty hunters to ethereum, I think that almost all bounty hunters would be glad of that.
But until now it didn't do much. Make payments using eth, btc or USDT. Actually this is a solution so that when the listing does not occur, a dump occurs because the bounty hunter sells at a low price. I really hope that in the future this project can be done.
If they are serious and wanted not to let the project being harmed by the hunters, allocating this types of funds can be a good answer, knowing that bounty hunters immidiately dumped the coins after receiving it, if they have enough funds to pay in btc or any other available coins, people who
participate and invest will have a much better chance to grow as they won't think about dumped that will lead to unsuccessful projects.
im a bounty hunter before but i dont dumped my tokens after i recieved them and how come that a bounty hunter will dump their coins if the value is only low ? that is bad idea because they will only pay more on the gas or the eth and on the trading fee as well .
how can they possibly withdrew thier coins that way ? dont judge the bounty hunters next time meyt because they arent the ones that dumped the price but the whales are maybe the real suspek on why ico coins can get dumped after listing .
Every coin has different potential and not all coins are like that. Many coins that have a solid Team and when they enter the market the price is very good. Maybe we have to work hard to get a project like that. But your idea of paying bounty hunters using Ethereum is very good and there have been many projects like that.
But until now it didn't do much. Make payments using eth, btc or USDT. Actually this is a solution so that when the listing does not occur, a dump occurs because the bounty hunter sells at a low price. I really hope that in the future this project can be done.
If they are serious and wanted not to let the project being harmed by the hunters, allocating this types of funds can be a good answer, knowing that bounty hunters immidiately dumped the coins after receiving it, if they have enough funds to pay in btc or any other available coins, people who
participate and invest will have a much better chance to grow as they won't think about dumped that will lead to unsuccessful projects.
But until now it didn't do much. Make payments using eth, btc or USDT. Actually this is a solution so that when the listing does not occur, a dump occurs because the bounty hunter sells at a low price. I really hope that in the future this project can be done.
it is true that a coin price also influences enthusiasts and makes a project successful but now there are many tokens that have low prices and not even prices, surely participants who join sometimes are sad over conditions like this, but it can also go up sometime and give profit, the most important thing is if you hold a coin for now there is a good thing to save it as a long-term savings. Hopefully it will have a price and provide good benefits.
I don't agree that a falling price is necessarily a failing project. Usually coins list on exchange at the time when the project is still under development and coin is not having value yet. It tends to rise up again especially after the project is fully developed so don't be afraid if the price falls after listing, and dump your bounty tokens cheap
Sometimes the falls on the price usually after the bounty campaign, but if the project has not done on their roadmap and couple of months the price are still on the bottom then that is the time to withraw your holdings on that coin.
I dont believe bounty hunters are to be held responsible for a drop in price of tokens or coins. In most cases distribution to investors both private and public happens way before the bounty hunter gets his or her share of that token, but you we still discover that the price has gone 60% below the ICO price and that says a lot about projects like that and has nothing to do with bounty hunters
It is right, that usually the supply for bounty hunters will not be too much and this will not affect the price changes when the coin is listed in the market. But this is different when the supply of allocations for computer bounties is at a high percentage. Actually what will affect is how a developer divides the percentage of the project they make. 
I was once an investor had few gains to some ICO/crowdsale but made many losses so I decided to stop participating in ICO instead I do bounties and buy it thru exchanges from bounty hunters dumping it.
I know for a fact that most of you know this situation and are guilty of it, price tends to tank due to bounty hunters selling their share of tokens for cheap. I think its better to pay hunters in eth or other alts rather than risking the price of their token or coin in that way they could also help their investors and boost confidence to their future and their project. Well for me a falling price is a mark of a failing project "ICO's"
We know that bounty hunters often sell tokens they get from bounties because they don't want to wait too long and we know the first token distribution is for investors and most investors also choose to sell it, when the token reaches the bounty hunters the price is even lower. So, I think there is always a cause for what happened.I know for a fact that most of you know this situation and are guilty of it, price tends to tank due to bounty hunters selling their share of tokens for cheap. I think its better to pay hunters in eth or other alts rather than risking the price of their token or coin in that way they could also help their investors and boost confidence to their future and their project. Well for me a falling price is a mark of a failing project "ICO's"
Yes, this is absolutely right, mate! I don't know why people can't see the investor dumpers! Everyone loves to blame the bounty hunters, even many bounty hunters blame each other about dumping the price! Bounty hunters worked hard and get paid! So, selling or holding decisions are their's personal! People should stop blaming them, they just got only 1% of total sale tokens!
I don't agree that a falling price is necessarily a failing project. Usually coins list on exchange at the time when the project is still under development and coin is not having value yet. It tends to rise up again especially after the project is fully developed so don't be afraid if the price falls after listing, and dump your bounty tokens cheap
I dont believe bounty hunters are to be held responsible for a drop in price of tokens or coins. In most cases distribution to investors both private and public happens way before the bounty hunter gets his or her share of that token, but you we still discover that the price has gone 60% below the ICO price and that says a lot about projects like that and has nothing to do with bounty hunters
Price does not matter for bounty hunter, if the team had good product and know everything could after distributing the shares of the participant, they think for the solution not the bounty hunters need to adjust, as a bounty hunter we have the right to sell it right away.
What i mean is, there will be no problem at price in any good project right, development make it rise up again
What i mean is, there will be no problem at price in any good project right, development make it rise up again
Bounty hunters who sell their rewards in an ICO in a cheap orice do not have effect in a project and the coin , it only affects the price of the token because most of the bounty hunters sell cheap because they want to have money instantly even if the coin is not that much in value. And the number one reason why a coin is cheap in value is beacuse of the bounty hunters dumping it in exchanges .
The effect of dump from bounty hunters only temporary. If the project is good and worth to invest, i am believe the price will keep profitable and if hunters dump their reward, i think its an opportunity for buying below ICO price
more demand and more liquidity
Do you seriously think that 1-2% of people who pay bounty to hunters of the total number of tokens sold can somehow affect the price of tokens of a promising project? You are a stupid person if you think so.
Often the price is torn down either by early investors or the project developers themselves.
Often the price is torn down either by early investors or the project developers themselves.
not always . if the project is great. and really worth it, it will not fall much after the bounty hunters sell their coins. And then everything will return and will grow.
Bounty hunters mostly will just have a small percentage in the tokens distributed and even if they would dump it will not affect the market because there are more big factors to consider like the investors themselves. Investors would either buy the cheap tokens being sold by the bounty hunters nor sell theirs to get profit from bonuses they had got from buying too many.
It is a good business to buy coins on sale from the companies of Bounty companies. I used to try to do this, it was quite profitable. I was once an investor had few gains to some ICO/crowdsale but made many losses so I decided to stop participating in ICO instead I do bounties and buy it thru exchanges from bounty hunters dumping it.
I know for a fact that most of you know this situation and are guilty of it, price tends to tank due to bounty hunters selling their share of tokens for cheap. I think its better to pay hunters in eth or other alts rather than risking the price of their token or coin in that way they could also help their investors and boost confidence to their future and their project. Well for me a falling price is a mark of a failing project "ICO's"
As a bounty Hunter, I would have preferred it more if bounty rewards are paid in eth and other grounded altcoin. But the statement bounty hunters dumping a token is not always true as we have seen cases where none of the token have reached bounty hunters and in few hours of listing the prices has crashed. The substance of the project matter a lot and not all the time bounty hunters should bear the blame. I know for a fact that most of you know this situation and are guilty of it, price tends to tank due to bounty hunters selling their share of tokens for cheap. I think its better to pay hunters in eth or other alts rather than risking the price of their token or coin in that way they could also help their investors and boost confidence to their future and their project. Well for me a falling price is a mark of a failing project "ICO's"
Jump to: