Topic: All about bounty payments and its effect to the project - page 5. (Read 2133 times)

Well, participation in the bounty does not require much experience. After 2017, many people became greedy, they want to earn thousands of dollars from one project, which they chose almost at random in 5 minutes.

Yes in fact ico coins and tokens are undervalued after it gets listed. Only few of the project had succeeded to increase their coins and tokens after listed in an exchange.

Bounty payments are relatively smaller shares but it is essential in promoting the project. At first, bounty team are good at bounty hunters but later on some of them will become snobber knowing that their ICO period is almost done and bounty hunters work is not anymore.important to them. Sad reality!

In addition to what you said, I don't any reason why 7% which was the highest allocated token pay for bounty hunters this days will affect the price of a project after exchange listing but what most project owners ignore is that what usually lead to the dump in price of project after exchange listing are causes by the early miners.
Like you said only ICOs with weak team management are the project that usually dump in price after exchange listing.

A lot of big effects tru the project as investors will assure the tokens will not be dumped after listing and it will not be killed after listing as we know bounty hunters has been res for token dumping but i think they are not i see investors dump price also,so to assure bounty hunters and investors will benefit the project must lock a payment on bounty hunters and project will benefited more about this as investors will be attracted to join the project.so the developers and managers must think about it.

Some people say, bounty hunters will dump token/coin price, but if the project have a good development, thats no problem!, they can wait the market move and sometimes team will buyback their tokens/coins. Actually tokens/coins will not dumped by bounty hunters if rewarded with ETH or BTC. 

Hello guys,

I think bounties are fine. I would actually go further and say that well thought out and managed, they can make a project almost entirely. They allow a project to use the strength of their community. Think about what a project can do once they have hundreds of people actively working for them. This is what LTO Network is doing btw.

We have a quiz about them soon. Nearly $1,000 in prizes.

🚨AMAZING Event incoming 🚨

👊 We are very happy and excited to tell the world we are partnering with LTO Network to bring you the best! We will be hosting the...

🔥🔥 LTO Network Quiz on Tuesday 30th of April 🔥🔥

ℹ️ LTO Network is a Hybrid blockchain built for business. The trust layer for every business application. Easy, scalable & GDPR compliant.

🚀 Come finally learn about this very promising project that's been talked about in almost every channel now 😉

💰 Research the project and compete to win 10,000 LTO 😱 that will be evenly split among winners.

✅ There will be between 5 and 8 questions about LTO Network. The best answers will be selected by the team.

🌐 LTO Network (https://lto.network/) 🌐 

🕑 The quiz will start in GAINS Quizzes (https://t.me/GainsQuizzes) Tuesday the 30th of April at 18h UTC+2.

😎 Do your resarch 📚 and see you there for a fun event! May the best win 🏆

This is all real, no scam. We've been thriving with our amazing community for nearly a year and a half now. Come check it out.
Main channels:
Telegram Community - https://t.me/GainsChat
Telegram Announcements - https://t.me/GainsANN
Telegram Quizzes - https://t.me/GainsQuizzes
Twitter - https://twitter.com/GainsAssociates
Discord - Discord - https://discord.gg/WebCxR3

I think that's not matter with regards bounty hunters dumping their tokens after they received their part from bounty. Because its only around 2 to 5% were only allocated from bounties, so it just a small part compare to those who invested from a project. If the project was really a good one it will last like some top altcoins who still profitable to invest.

Bounty payments do not have any big influence on the project. Only ICOs with a very weak team management, can allow a price drop after exchange listing. There were so much examples of hunters getting real money, without any price drops after the listing.

The only effect i see is that hunters payment affect market because of the mass dumping,most hunters dont hold all they do is to receive and dump immediately which do affects investors and affect the project as well.but what i observe and will keep saying is project with good foundation will keep going no matter how the dumping may be.they will keep moving and nothing will affect them. this market issues really affect some project to the extent that they cant even pay hunters.

why do we mostly consider bounty hunters dumping their tokens is the main reason for the fall of a project? only 1-5% are mostly allocated for bounties but bounty hunters are the most blamed. the amount reserved for bounty is not enough to bring the price of a coin down and also the fall of a coin does not mean its the end or failure of the project.

Bounty payments are usually a small percent of total supply of the coins and long term they can not have price impact but short term they could. Demand for the product is the key for the price.

Another scenario of token getting dumped is a situation when the team are not truthful with the amount money raised.. they'll make bogus claims of how they've raised millions of dollar.. from investors only to get listed on exchange and then you'll notice those investors they claim to have are imaginary

I think you're wrong in this one.. Most of the time.. when a token is listed on exchange it looks as if hunters are the ones doing the dumping. But it has been proven times without number that private sales and presale investors are the real dumpers not bounty hunters... hunters in most cases... do not have enough token to bring down the price of a coin

The CRYPTO space is evolving therefore several evolution is taking place which have an impact on bounty and payment, base on the development from ICO to IEO, lots of developers now feels bounty is not necessary to have a successful fund raising and also the bear market has an influence on payment to bounty hunters.

This is not always truth because I have participated in many bounty campaigns before delay the time of paying bounty hunters yet the price sank. Bsse on my opinion, bounty allocation is not enough to sank the value of a project, there are many factors that come to play when it comes to this.

Huge bonuses is normal and almost all the ico that i see do always have that feature  .that is thier key strategy to attract potential investors and this was also the reason why ico got alot of investors . investor came for the bonus in order to earn a profit , thats why its normal for them to dump the coins whatever they like because they invested a capital with it ( they invested money )  while you/us bounty hunters didnt invest any single penny so why we are the ones who complains the most  ?

Actually it does not seem fair to blame the bounty hunters for these eventual falls in the prices of the tokens, because the amount of tokens given in a bounty campaign rarely exceed 1 or 2% of the total, and that amount compared to the remaining 98% seems to me too small to move the market so massively.

I have no doubt that there is a market manipulation that makes almost all ICOs collapse as soon as they are listed in the exchanges, otherwise this erratic behavior in prices could not be explained.

Until now, not many projects have paid bounty hunters using eth or other altcoins. Because those who carry out ICO also need funds for the development of their projects. Of course if payment uses eth, the project is very difficult to do that. Therefore they allocate their tokens to bounty hunters. For the problem of falling prices, of course all decisions are in the hands of coin holders and some project teams must also maintain the price of their coins.

We should learn to live with and we should be ready to face anything about the market, I think quitting bounty is not good decision because we know it does not charge anything to spend time with bounty so even if they pay low amount of money we should be ready to take part and to be part of it, system will come to the track very soon.

project developers certainly expect the tokens to be launched to be able to be promoted by many people, so that if bounty hunters can be paid in other eth or alt forms, of course this cannot be utilized by the promotion program they carry out, because it aims to increase investors who are interested in investing in it.