Pages:
Author

Topic: All altcoins without proof of work will be destroyed (Read 377 times)

hero member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 503
the world is ruled by energy sellers, coins threatening coins with proof of work will be destroyed like this car https://youtu.be/Jivb7lupDNU

The higher the hashrate (kilowatt to be exact) - the better the coin, the technology does not matter

We should be able to accept every new experimentation and think out of the box if we really want cryptocurrency and blockchain tech to succeed.
Tokens can never replace mineable coin while they may serve a different purpose. We need to have ever diverse form of proving a transaction.
It's about talking whether a car is better than an airplane. Both serves different purpose.

yes, i agree with you,,
i believe non mineable cryptocurrencywith solid team and active development will survive in this industry,
because this is not about car, but this is about cryptocurrencies a digital assets my friend
We already have a coin that can prove non mineable coins would be able to survive in cryptocurrency space, the coin is IOTA which is rank 16 in coinmarketcap.
full member
Activity: 562
Merit: 101
the world is ruled by energy sellers, coins threatening coins with proof of work will be destroyed like this car https://youtu.be/Jivb7lupDNU

The higher the hashrate (kilowatt to be exact) - the better the coin, the technology does not matter

We should be able to accept every new experimentation and think out of the box if we really want cryptocurrency and blockchain tech to succeed.
Tokens can never replace mineable coin while they may serve a different purpose. We need to have ever diverse form of proving a transaction.
It's about talking whether a car is better than an airplane. Both serves different purpose.

yes, i agree with you,,
i believe non mineable cryptocurrencywith solid team and active development will survive in this industry,
because this is not about car, but this is about cryptocurrencies a digital assets my friend
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1069
the world is ruled by energy sellers, coins threatening coins with proof of work will be destroyed like this car https://youtu.be/Jivb7lupDNU

The higher the hashrate (kilowatt to be exact) - the better the coin, the technology does not matter

We should be able to accept every new experimentation and think out of the box if we really want cryptocurrency and blockchain tech to succeed.
Tokens can never replace mineable coin while they may serve a different purpose. We need to have ever diverse form of proving a transaction.
It's about talking whether a car is better than an airplane. Both serves different purpose.
sr. member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 453
I am not going in to an argument to prove PoW is better than PoS or vice-versa. But we have a decentralized, unbiased and free market, and the market conditions, demand and merit will decide which one of these coins will survive. Just because you don't like PoS, it is not fair to kill all such coins (which is not possible for you anyway).
full member
Activity: 798
Merit: 101
Start arguing about the good or bad of POW and POS? I think this is still handed over to the time test. Both have their own shortcomings and advantages. Perhaps, more advanced algorithms will appear in the future.
hero member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 593
the company controls the hashrate, the government controls the company, energy sellers control the government  Smiley

now the most interesting question is whether China will be able to ban mining, in which 80% of the bitcoin hashrate, I think that it can not, money is more expensive than the environment for energy sellers even for Communist China

an interesting coincidence: at coal in China is also 80% of power plants
sr. member
Activity: 966
Merit: 274
the world is ruled by energy sellers, coins threatening coins with proof of work will be destroyed like this car https://youtu.be/Jivb7lupDNU

The higher the hashrate (kilowatt to be exact) - the better the coin, the technology does not matter

Well, basically, hashrate also increases the security of a token or coin, in some sense, there are projects before that gets hacked because a huge hashrate volume is held by a just one entity miner, and that is risky for the project, I will not going to name that company since I know, many here know that well.
hero member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 593
not confuse pow and pos
hero member
Activity: 3108
Merit: 537
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
This technology continues to evolve and developments continue. Every change will certainly produce a new one as well as a new consensus mechanism that will be born and overcome problems and shortcomings in the previous one. POW is still a preferred choice, but the current development of POS is also an option by considering various advantages and disadvantages of each. But it does not mean that altcoin with a mechanism other than POW will not survive, precisely with these changes and developments, the new consensus mechanism will try to overcome the shortcomings of the previous mechanism.
surely you are right. POS-staking has been and remains one of the most reliable and affordable ways to generate passive income for most investors.
and remember while at the same time POW consumes a lot of energy and that gives a lot of contribution to the global warming. both are good system but it will be a perfect system when both getting implemented at the same time.
Not so many coins are interested in POW consider the asic miners.
full member
Activity: 644
Merit: 101
It may be so, but I think that such tokens will be valued more today, because this protocol has really great prospects, namely, that the very idea of ​​the protocol is really transparent! And I think that everything will develop further.
sr. member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 251
Trident Protocol | Simple «buy-hold-earn» system!
I do not think that the coins on the PoW algorithm will be destroyed. The technology is developing and I think that they will come up with better solutions. I like the POS algorithm that ETH has switched to.


POW and POS algorithms are basically both good and have their own advantages and disadvantages, so their technology has indeed developed and has its own interests, if in my opinion both are good.
sr. member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 310
the world is ruled by energy sellers, coins threatening coins with proof of work will be destroyed like this car https://youtu.be/Jivb7lupDNU

The higher the hashrate (kilowatt to be exact) - the better the coin, the technology does not matter

So the Proof of Stake big coin like DASH will be destroyed in the future ?
What are your opinion based on ? All coins without Proof of Work doesn't mean they have no place in the crypto sphere.
I don't think that gonna be happening, and more coins without proof of work will be created.

If I'm not mistaken, I think technically DASH is implementing a Proof of Work consensus algorithm with its X11 hashing algorithm and not Proof of Stake. Though its a little bit confusing, DASH also employs masternode technology to further improve its functions and services which oftentimes referred as POS but in reality, its not. And since DASH also employs POW and other useful features I think its very likely to survive long term. Imho.
jr. member
Activity: 393
Merit: 1
Coinsbit exchange
This technology continues to evolve and developments continue. Every change will certainly produce a new one as well as a new consensus mechanism that will be born and overcome problems and shortcomings in the previous one. POW is still a preferred choice, but the current development of POS is also an option by considering various advantages and disadvantages of each. But it does not mean that altcoin with a mechanism other than POW will not survive, precisely with these changes and developments, the new consensus mechanism will try to overcome the shortcomings of the previous mechanism.
surely you are right. POS-staking has been and remains one of the most reliable and affordable ways to generate passive income for most investors.
member
Activity: 574
Merit: 10
This technology continues to evolve and developments continue. Every change will certainly produce a new one as well as a new consensus mechanism that will be born and overcome problems and shortcomings in the previous one. POW is still a preferred choice, but the current development of POS is also an option by considering various advantages and disadvantages of each. But it does not mean that altcoin with a mechanism other than POW will not survive, precisely with these changes and developments, the new consensus mechanism will try to overcome the shortcomings of the previous mechanism.
full member
Activity: 966
Merit: 111
Both algorithm and proof of work to ascertain level of hashrate isn't enough, leave all the shitcoins and the valuable coins to keep going, in the short or long run we will know who's is who and the fake coins will be sieved and the good ones will remain, the technology is not enough, Crypto itself will evolve and few digital currency will stand out like dollars and yuan are among the reserve currency because of its value
Maybe what you say is true too. Usually it is, if a project or coin that does not develop in the future will surely die too. And a really good project or coin will certainly survive with future developments. So it must be left alone.
full member
Activity: 896
Merit: 103
it is interesting, but if it could be fair almost? I think that need to create a few regulative structures to check the projects
hero member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 505
the world is ruled by energy sellers, coins threatening coins with proof of work will be destroyed like this car https://youtu.be/Jivb7lupDNU

The higher the hashrate (kilowatt to be exact) - the better the coin, the technology does not matter
Well, in as much as am not really a fan of POS, but one thing we should know is that this is the crypto space and the crypto space is a free market where everyone have the right to create anything they want as long as they see it as an upgrade, so I don't think POS is going to die but It would be upgraded because I can see that it still has a lot of faults that needs to be solved before it can be pushed out to the world fully for mass adoption.
sr. member
Activity: 714
Merit: 251
the world is ruled by energy sellers, coins threatening coins with proof of work will be destroyed like this car https://youtu.be/Jivb7lupDNU

The higher the hashrate (kilowatt to be exact) - the better the coin, the technology does not matter

Technology always matters! There are several PoW coins doing well in the market irrespective of hash rate and in future, with room for crypto evolution and improvement, PoW coins can be better
jr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 1
Both algorithm and proof of work to ascertain level of hashrate isn't enough, leave all the shitcoins and the valuable coins to keep going, in the short or long run we will know who's is who and the fake coins will be sieved and the good ones will remain, the technology is not enough, Crypto itself will evolve and few digital currency will stand out like dollars and yuan are among the reserve currency because of its value
hero member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 593
cars are much more pollute the air, but still gasoline is not changed to water!



the world is ruled by energy sellers, coins threatening coins with proof of work will be destroyed like this car https://youtu.be/Jivb7lupDNU

The higher the hashrate (kilowatt to be exact) - the better the coin, the technology does not matter
I dont think so, It's different thing. There are two options when the whole POW coin supply already mined. The first option is using Proof of Stake to validate the transactions. The second option is still using POW but the miner won't get coin from the block but from the fee of transactions. Then, coins without POW should not just die like that but it depends on the developer which method to use. Just like the car you mentioned, people just love other cars that's why that car is not really popular. Simple think.

water instead of gasoline is the dream of any motorist!
Pages:
Jump to: