All eyes On Trump As Kamal Harris Gives Up On Bitcoin Conference Attendance - page 3.

South Park

hero member

Activity: 2884

Merit: 794

I am terrible at Fantasy Football!!!

Quote from: Kemarit on July 26, 2024, 05:05:14 AM

Quote from: mindrust on July 26, 2024, 02:35:08 AM

Makes sense. Kamala is anti-bitcoin and Trump is pro-bitcoin.

Why would Kama attend to the conference? People wouldn’t listen to her anti-bitcoin shilling. Lots of “Boooo”s and “Hooo”s would happen. In the end she would have to leave the conference with her tail between her legs.

It wouldn’t be a good look for her campaign.

Exactly, it will damage her and here political affiliations if suddenly he speaks on that conference. They are anti-bitcoin and imposing like taxes for the miners and even try to put pressure on SEC in the beginning to not approved a Bitcoin ETF.

In any case, the Bitcoin conference has started it's effect on the price, as we have a pump already from $65,000->$67,000.

Trump will be speaking on the last day, so we should be expecting that perhaps the price could go to $70,000, I reckon.

Not attending will still damage her, it is just that this is the lesser out of two evils, as you can make sure the Trump campaign will make sure to let people know that Trump is now in favor of bitcoin, or at least that is what he claims right now, and I have no doubts that this can have an effect on the independent voters, since more than anything what people care about right now is their own finances, and many of them have obtained great profits thanks to bitcoin and a strict regulation will damage their interests.

DeathAngel

legendary

Activity: 3234

Merit: 1613

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Be really interesting to see what he says tomorrow. I believe Saylor & Cathy Wood speak at the conference foday but everybody wants to see what the potential new President says. Bitcoin price has clawed back to $67000 so starting from a good point. Can we get a Trump pump tomorrow I wonder.

Kemarit

legendary

Activity: 3080

Merit: 1353

Quote from: mindrust on July 26, 2024, 02:35:08 AM

Makes sense. Kamala is anti-bitcoin and Trump is pro-bitcoin.

Why would Kama attend to the conference? People wouldn’t listen to her anti-bitcoin shilling. Lots of “Boooo”s and “Hooo”s would happen. In the end she would have to leave the conference with her tail between her legs.

It wouldn’t be a good look for her campaign.

Exactly, it will damage her and here political affiliations if suddenly he speaks on that conference. They are anti-bitcoin and imposing like taxes for the miners and even try to put pressure on SEC in the beginning to not approved a Bitcoin ETF.

In any case, the Bitcoin conference has started it's effect on the price, as we have a pump already from $65,000->$67,000.

Trump will be speaking on the last day, so we should be expecting that perhaps the price could go to $70,000, I reckon.

mindrust

legendary

Activity: 3276

Merit: 2442

Makes sense. Kamala is anti-bitcoin and Trump is pro-bitcoin.

Why would Kama attend to the conference? People wouldn’t listen to her anti-bitcoin shilling. Lots of “Boooo”s and “Hooo”s would happen. In the end she would have to leave the conference with her tail between her legs.

It wouldn’t be a good look for her campaign.

FinneysTrueVision

sr. member

Activity: 1680

Merit: 379

Top Crypto Casino

It was obvious she was not going to accept a last minute invitation. Vice Presidents don’t have much power to affect policy, so it’s a huge stretch to say she “actively” imprisoned developers. I’m not saying she’d be better than Biden but there are plenty of things to criticize her for during her time as California attorney general and US senator that it is not necessary to resort to political spin and propaganda.

Aside from being an Ordinal shitcoin scammer David Bailey is also a Trump bootlicker and will say whatever to promote Trump. If Trump wins, it will likely result in favorable business deals for his companies. Bailey’s concern isn’t with who Kamala might have imprisoned. If he could benefit financially from her presidency he would be the first to endorse her and any inconvenient details would be overlooked, just like how the Trump administration's persecution of Julian Assange has quickly been forgotten.

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

Quote from: uneng on July 25, 2024, 07:48:59 PM

Lol, to speak anything at a conference anyone can do, especially a candidate during the elections. So much adulation on Trump by crypto community these days, as if he had given any contribution to Bitcoin adoption and acceptance during his previous government. Not only he didn't give a shit about Bitcoin, as he also spoke against Bitcoin. But these sockpuppets just ignore the facts. The search for the truth doesn't mean anything these days. This circus is just ridiculous.

So called social influencers leading a mass of sheep directly to the slaughterhouse voluntarily. These fools are trying to create a kind of Holy Trinity consisting of Donald Trump, Elon Musk and Bitcoin. Tongue

Not sure why Trump would go speak at a Bitcoin conference, which are mostly attended by libertarians, when he was loudly booed and jeered at the last libertarian conference he want to.

It would not be political suicide, but you would have to say it would be a very poor campaigning choice from Trump's staff. The news would be all over it.

tread93

hero member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 568

Quote from: Marvell1 on July 25, 2024, 11:49:24 AM

Quote from: un_rank on July 25, 2024, 11:10:49 AM

I am honestly bored of the Trump and Bitcoin talk, but I can also admit that the Biden administration with Kamala Harris as vice has been anti-bitcoin for the most part of it. There has been to many policies designed to frustrate bitcoin mining, privacy and decentralization. It would have been an ironic surprise for her to speak at a bitcoin conference.

The 4 years of Trump was better than the last 4 years but was also not exactly pro-bitcoin. Leaving nothing to suggest that he will push the network forward if he wins.

- Jay -

Not only our forum, topics about Trump and bitcoin are flooding social networks, especially X, the social network where the majority of users are cryptocurrency investors.

Indeed, we have no guarantee that Trump will push the network forward if he is elected, but as you also acknowledge, the Biden administration is anti-bitcoin and Kamala Harris may maintain that position. The topic of Trump may become boring but clearly supporting him can create new opportunities for us beyond what the current administration is creating.

This is a big conference, the attendees are mostly strong bitcoin supporters, so let's wait and see what Trump will say and how people will react to it.

I would rather call this conference "YUGE, the greatest bitcoin conference in the world. There is no conference that is bigger or better than the Bitcoin Conference here in beautiful Nashville" Hopefully you read that in Donald Trump's accent lmao. We will see what he has to say at 2pm Central Time US coming live from Nashville, TN!

potatotom

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

Yeah I do agree uneng...

However what we should not forget is that at least sows another seed of "safety" or perhaps "acceptance". I'm all in for Bitcoin going a bit more mainstream, it will be safer for all of us.

And then lightning please, the legal uncertainty pertaining lightning for private operators in the US has to stop!

uneng

hero member

Activity: 2044

Merit: 784

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Lol, to speak anything at a conference anyone can do, especially a candidate during the elections. So much adulation on Trump by crypto community these days, as if he had given any contribution to Bitcoin adoption and acceptance during his previous government. Not only he didn't give a shit about Bitcoin, as he also spoke against Bitcoin. But these sockpuppets just ignore the facts. The search for the truth doesn't mean anything these days. This circus is just ridiculous.

So called social influencers leading a mass of sheep directly to the slaughterhouse voluntarily. These fools are trying to create a kind of Holy Trinity consisting of Donald Trump, Elon Musk and Bitcoin. Tongue

AmoreJaz

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 1102

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: un_rank on July 25, 2024, 02:54:18 PM

Quote from: Marvell1 on July 25, 2024, 11:49:24 AM

The topic of Trump may become boring but clearly supporting him can create new opportunities for us beyond what the current administration is creating.

The way I see it now, it is Trump who needs Bitcoin more. It fits into the attempt to sell himself as a progressive candidate. Bitcoin will be fine for 4 years whoever is the president during that period.

Quote from: tranthidung on July 25, 2024, 12:17:42 PM

It's another reason Kamala should not join the conference, at least don't join it will help her to avoid additional damage on her election program for very last months before the election.

She should have not been invited at all, except it was an attempt to hurt her campaign by asking her some tough, difficult to get out of questions.
- Jay -

With politicians or not, bitcoin market continues to exist. However, with the endorsement of the next US President would create further demand and so the increase of price is imminent. Trump may be pro-crypto but once he is elected, do you really think it would be easy to pass a crypto-related bill?

At the end of the day, whether the leader is pro-crypto or not, you are the one shaping your life and so it is still on you how you will deal with your everyday life to improve your economic status.

snerd

member

Activity: 17

Merit: 1

Quote from: legiteum on July 25, 2024, 11:57:31 AM

While Trump is happy to take money from suckers who will donate to his campaign in hopes of special favors after he's elected, the "Bitcoin vote" doesn't exist in any significant quantity in this election.

This year's election in the USA is going to be about abortion and whether it should remain legal like it has been or whether it should be criminalized nationwide.

Republicans think abortion is "baby murder", and would do anything to stop it, including voting for somebody who would ban Bitcoin that's what it took.

Democrats see the abortion criminalization Republicans want as a fundamental attack on their bodily autonomy, and more practically speaking, the end of safe sex in the United States because there's no recourse if one's birth control fails--so every act of sex in the country Republicans want must necessarily consider the possibility of there being a baby. And most people aren't in the position to have (another) baby. So hence Republicans are basically trying to... outlaw sex.

So it's "baby murder" versus the end of sex. Compared to those stakes, Bitcoin isn't even remotely on any voter's radar.

Dude! Give it a rest! This is a BITCOIN topic!

nelson4lov

hero member

Activity: 2184

Merit: 798

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: un_rank on July 25, 2024, 11:10:49 AM

~Snipped

The 4 years of Trump was better than the last 4 years but was also not exactly pro-bitcoin. Leaving nothing to suggest that he will push the network forward if he wins.

- Jay -

The fact that he wasn't a Pro-Bitcoin supporter duruing his tenure doesn't mean he isn't now. Bitcoin have come a long way in the last 4 years, withstanding plenty of attacks even though the policies have been terrible to say the least. I know politicians usually lie during their campaigns and flip upon winning but it's worth noting that among all recent US president, Trump has been the most informed about crypto. I think the guy already has about 3 NFT collections so far.

348Judah

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 521

PredX - AI-Powered Prediction Market

When it comes to bitcoin adoption, some will by theirself willingly succumb to the decentralized network with bitcoin because its going to get to a stage whereby they can't do without the need of the influence from the bitcoin community, if what makes someone like trump to back off the anti-bitcoin attack on bitcoin and support for it use, then any other person can change and anything is willing or possible to happen in regards to change over anyone's take on bitcoin.

coolcoinz

legendary

Activity: 2744

Merit: 1174

Quote from: buwaytress on July 25, 2024, 01:29:33 PM

Never in good taste to try and curry favour with someone, and then when it fails, turn on them. Come on, we're better than this, aren't we? If she were imprisoning developers, why would you invite her in the first place?

Surely we're supposed to be better than this (I know we're not, but heh).

I agree. This looks like a money grab by the organizers. They want to kiss everyone's asses so much only to get their names on the list. Since inviting Trump paid off, why not invite Kamala, right? While we're at it, let's invite Brad Sherman and Elizabeth Warren. There's freedom of speech. If people like that want to attend and speak their mind they should be allowed to do so, but I wouldn't invite them.

I like politics, but I feel like we could use less politics in bitcoin.

irhact

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 749

Quote from: Wakate on July 25, 2024, 01:17:57 PM

For now, we can all see that she has no interest in supporting Bitcoin and we are not surprised about that. We are going to keep supporting the candidates that want to see cryptocurrency surge high and have lots of adoption. There had been speculations that she did not believe in Bitcoin and she has admitted that Bitcoin is for criminals which I think is quite wrong and that would not give us the interest to support her ambition. Whether she likes it or not, we can't be seeing other countries supporting the growth of Bitcoin while the United States is at far length. We'll going to see how this election is going to work out for her is she still insists to give a thumb for Bitcoin adoption.

There was nothing that she was going to say that'll convince us to support her as she didn't show any interest in Bitcoin from the beginning. It was always Donald Trump that has been saying good things about Bitcoin and I can't wait to hear him speak at the conference. I don't have the chance to attend but I'll be watching on the internet and I am hoping that everything he says be something worth believing in and gains alot of supporters for him Trump isn't going to throw saw this opportunity of him becoming a US president again. They didn't allow him to finish his last tenor and he probably will have some unfinished business that he will have to handle.

un_rank

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 661

- Jay -

Quote from: Marvell1 on July 25, 2024, 11:49:24 AM

The topic of Trump may become boring but clearly supporting him can create new opportunities for us beyond what the current administration is creating.

The way I see it now, it is Trump who needs Bitcoin more. It fits into the attempt to sell himself as a progressive candidate. Bitcoin will be fine for 4 years whoever is the president during that period.

Quote from: tranthidung on July 25, 2024, 12:17:42 PM

It's another reason Kamala should not join the conference, at least don't join it will help her to avoid additional damage on her election program for very last months before the election.

She should have not been invited at all, except it was an attempt to hurt her campaign by asking her some tough, difficult to get out of questions.

- Jay -

Zlantann

legendary

Activity: 896

Merit: 1020

Quote from: cabron on July 25, 2024, 01:11:59 PM

If she speaks at the conference then she has to be in favor of BTC and otherwise, there is no reason for her to be there. Avoiding this event is better for her campaign than speaking at this conference. It's obviously for people who like BTC. It's not believable in any way if Kamala starts to become a Bitcoiner too.

A big percentage of US voters are crypto users so there's that which is like Trump securing his win. The social media people are just streaming Trump.

There are many versions of the story about her invitation and later decline. But if she had accepted the invitation at first, it might indicate that she might not be as strict as Joe Biden. I believe she was advised not to attend because sharing the same podium with Donald Trump can harm her reputation the way it happened to Joe Biden. She knows little about Bitcoin, so she might end up speaking ignorantly which will not be too good.

It could also be that she doesn't want to mend fences with the crypto community because she is not a supporter of the technology. If this was the case, then the crypto industry should be prepared for harsher policies if she eventually wins. It will be nice to hear what Trump wants to say in the conference.

buwaytress

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 3603

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Never in good taste to try and curry favour with someone, and then when it fails, turn on them. Come on, we're better than this, aren't we? If she were imprisoning developers, why would you invite her in the first place?

Surely we're supposed to be better than this (I know we're not, but heh).

Wakate

hero member

Activity: 1106

Merit: 535

fillippone - Winner contest Pizza 2022

For now, we can all see that she has no interest in supporting Bitcoin and we are not surprised about that. We are going to keep supporting the candidates that want to see cryptocurrency surge high and have lots of adoption. There had been speculations that she did not believe in Bitcoin and she has admitted that Bitcoin is for criminals which I think is quite wrong and that would not give us the interest to support her ambition. Whether she likes it or not, we can't be seeing other countries supporting the growth of Bitcoin while the United States is at far length. We'll going to see how this election is going to work out for her is she still insists to give a thumb for Bitcoin adoption.

cabron

hero member

Activity: 2800

Merit: 595

https://www.betcoin.ag

If she speaks at the conference then she has to be in favor of BTC and otherwise, there is no reason for her to be there. Avoiding this event is better for her campaign than speaking at this conference. It's obviously for people who like BTC. It's not believable in any way if Kamala starts to become a Bitcoiner too.

A big percentage of US voters are crypto users so there's that which is like Trump securing his win. The social media people are just streaming Trump.

Topic: All eyes On Trump As Kamal Harris Gives Up On Bitcoin Conference Attendance - page 3. (Read 727 times)