How low do you realistically think we are going? $500? $400? $250? $100?
I suspect that the bulls will start putting up a real fight at around $530. The daily 300 SMA sits at around $470 and this has not been breached for more than 24 hours since 2011. 2011. Think about that.
Then, lets say that gets breached, then I think we will have a real dog fight down to $400. Same at $380.
Anything below $380 and I will be putting another $200k into the market myself. You think I'm the only one?
I know you are all happy go lucky with your bear calls. But I would not get to overconfident if I was you. There is a literal shit ton of fiat sitting on the sidelines on exchanges right now. There is more than $16 million on Bitfinex alone.
Not to mention, there are a ton of shorts.
So how low do you REALLY think we are going?
As I said in another thread, ~ 530 is a pretty key support level, so I would expect a nice bounce in the 520-540 range. Then again, I expected much more bounce on the 50% retrace to 555. I am amazed at how little buy pressure we're seeing at key supports. We've just been walking down the stairs here. I'd love to see signs of a trend reversal -- I really would. I'll take a bottom in the 520s. I'll take a bottom at $541. But we are back in an established down trend and the question is, will momentum pick up? In that case, I wouldn't count on long term MAs in this market during extreme volatility. There is just not enough price history here. Daily momentum (RSI, TSI) tells me that if this is going to play out like 2013, then we have
lots of room to fall. Never mind 2011. Having said that, a break of 400 on a retest would surprise me. But I can't justify ruling out sub-380 at this point, either. Not at all.
Regarding shorts -- IIRC, BTC swaps still down a fair bit from the 640s (from 8.5k or so), and yet USD swaps have hardly changed. Still almost $16.5 million in USD swapped. BFX says "very bullish." There's a lot of people in pain right now. You think there is more pressure for shorts to cover?
I don't necessarily trust those swap numbers. Also, that is margin trading only. In an oversold market, a lot of people have sold their coins hoping to buy in lower.
However, I don't understand this statement exactly "I wouldn't count on long term MAs in this market during extreme volatility. There is just not enough price history here." First, historically these moving averages have been great indicators of bottoms. So there is historical consistency there. Do we need 10 years of data to make it valid? Second, on the final day of "capitulation" in July the market fell 21%. A couple of weeks ago when we tested $400 again, the market fell 23% and crossed the 300 SMA for a few hours. So, in that way, I don't trust the MAs during "extreme volatility." However, we are "stair stepping" down as you say. We have 7 daily red candles and have fallen $75. That is not extreme volatility.
Are you suggesting not to trust the MAs if we crash in one day down to $350? If so, I agree. But do you REALLY see this happening. Is there any historical basis for you to predict this. I do not see one. A flash crash?
But, I'm not talking about a flash crash, I am talking about a bottom. I think the bottom is in at $400.
If it goes lower, it will be following the case from 2011. Which is the bears wet dream.
Like I said, I expect money to come in when the price is right. I just think some bears idea of when the price is right, is magical "to the moon" type thinking. And I am more than willing to put my dollars where my mouth is.
Also, in comparing the daily RSI from the two 2013 bubbles, the current RSI is trending right above the oversold line. It got overly inflated from the snapback from $400. But it doesn't actually have a lot of room to fall to reach the bottom July levels. In fact, I think it will reach there long before $400 is seen again.
So, what's the RSI case for going lower than $380? I do not see it if it is there.
The blanket statement that we are oversold does not address broader sentiment. Sure, many have sold coins. Looking here and at TV, many traders have bought back expecting retail investors to follow. Many have leveraged long. I am not interested in these sweeping statements like "we are oversold, so the bottom is in." Stochastics on longer time frames say we should bounce, sure.
Yes, regarding long term MAs, there is not enough history. The sample size is laughable for these kind of movements. Frankly, I think bitcoin's extremely short history of massive gains and untested price levels skews how one should approach long term MAs. I observe them, they have predictive power, but I cannot rely on them. I just put more emphasis on other metrics. The historical basis for breaking an MA just isn't very important to me. You say that it is -- fine. Agree to disagree. I have my methods and have done very well without such emphases. I am obviously not talking about extreme volatility in reference to stair stepping. I am talking about flash crashes / flash recoveries within a down trend.
When you say, "But, I'm not talking about a flash crash, I am talking about a bottom. I think the bottom is in at $400" ...wasn't the bottom at $400 a flash crash? No despair. Pure fear-based panic and flash recovery.
I don't care what anyone's wet dreams are. I am just trying to keep an open mind while I wait for signs of confirmation that the down trend is over. You expect money to enter when the price is right. You expect that at current or slightly lower levels. Some bears expect $400. Many expect much, much lower than that. So take your pick. I also don't care for the constant tendency on here to label some target as the consensus and say,
obviously buyers will front run and so you will never see $xxx coins. Maybe that is true -- but then, what is the consensus target? It is much less clear than people around here like to claim, I think.
Regarding daily RSI, that we are hovering above oversold doesn't strengthen the bull case in comparison to the April collapse. In early July 2013 we were extremely oversold -- RSI under 12 and TSI at -60 (on standard inputs, anyway). Regarding "it will reach there long before $400 is seen again" I am not sure I can agree, and this largely depends on the scope of price action between now and then. It is worth noting, I think, that the post-April decline was clearly less protracted than post-November, and this is illustrated pretty clearly looking at RSI and TSI.
It can go either way. I agree with your original post, if that wasn't clear. I just have no interest in proclaiming that the bottom is in at this time, or at these levels.