Topic: Altcoins founders need hire one that complement their efforts, please. - page 2. (Read 293 times)

Good points OP.
It is not as if most of the founders do not know what to do, particularly when it comes to getting more professionals to foster the development of their projects, but their major problem is lack of fund. This is why I am also concerned that, a lot of them are not ready financially for the project to kick-off, even if they intend to raise more funds.
A project found should have startup capital. If he doesn't have what to start with but has idea, he can approach those who have it one-on-0ne first, before coming to the crypto space to raise more funds.
So, having funds will give them the enablement to hire the needed professionals.

Candidly speaking, they need to hire those who can compliment their business.  How can a project stand out without the right team? Its impossible, you can't be a business oriented founder and still expert in tech.


Those with long-term goals are those founders hiring to compliment their vision in a project.
Here's is the point, how on earth can a founder with limited knowledge have a long-term vision? Its not possible. This'd reason why we have SCRAP's called Altcoins today.

They don't actually have to hire one, they need to stand out and be with the project they have started but if they have no choice and they want to leave, that suggestion of yours is good. I guess this has been detailed seen by other tech starters and they only want to start but only a few of them does have vision for long term goal. They lack of goal setting as well and the investors are left hanging once they leave and the sad part is they don't care about them.

Sometimes ago I was asked a simple question about some altcoins projects existence that fade away with time. In other word, why are many altcoins founders decided to focus on tech undermining what they are called for in life, some are good in generating business ideas but aren't good in tech.  We have seem cases of such with many projects without a tangible result, names withheld.

For any altcoin project to survive and succeed, the founder should understand what his call is concerning the project, they should know where they are good at and participate,  not interfering into others areas of specialization. Probably, Satoshi has business ideas and was also good on tech but others should not follow suits like him/her. This has destroyed many good projects from the surface of cryptosphere and should be voice out. Let every founder place priority over the area he or she specializes in and not doing all things at the same time without a good result.

Here are good examples: Google boys has Eric Schmidt, Facebook has Sheryl and Microsoft has Steve B. Looking at these projects, they survived and still surviving because of the hiring.

Therefore, altcoins founders should hire those techs to complement them on the techs side of the project. We are tired of half baked projects around us without a good case use.

What do you think we should emphasis in this matter?