@iamnotback (last reply, i promise)
the fact that you keep calling my opinion "leftist" makes clear how your "limited intellect" actually stops you to get out of the box
i have to agree with you when you say "leftism results in megadeath every damn time throughout human history", this is damn right! every social structure that allows centralized power is doomed to fail.
we are here because we are fascinated by decentralization but we still make the same mistake and we are still the same humans that created the need for centralization.
this thread makes me sick!
the rampant and ignorant sexism together with limited personal views makes me think that we are still very far from a Change.
if you don't get what i mean i would not be surprised.
the fact that you keep calling my opinion "leftist" makes clear how your "limited intellect" actually stops you to get out of the box
i have to agree with you when you say "leftism results in megadeath every damn time throughout human history", this is damn right! every social structure that allows centralized power is doomed to fail.
we are here because we are fascinated by decentralization but we still make the same mistake and we are still the same humans that created the need for centralization.
this thread makes me sick!
the rampant and ignorant sexism together with limited personal views makes me think that we are still very far from a Change.
if you don't get what i mean i would not be surprised.
The term sexism is only uttered by a leftist. There are two axis on a typical political philosophy chart. You can be economically conservative and socially liberal (but this is lying because social liberalism destroys economic conservatism).
Stand back and let nature do its thing.
Sexism is natural because it is a fact that women and men are not equal. Statistically women are greater at what women do best and men are greater at what men do best. There are probably exceptions on an individual basis. If this damned fact offends you, then it isn't my fault that you are irrational.
Sexism doesn't mean I condone any violence against women. It just means I rationally don't try to lie to myself about damned facts. You prefer to lie to yourself. The common trait of a leftist is irrationality and lying.
It is a fact that women are going to use their assets just as men use their assets. This is nature. No amount of leftist bullshit is going to change nature.
So stop berating me for your own fucking ignorance and irrationality. You are so fucking arrogant which associates you with the other pinheads here who are below your apparent intellect. Maybe you can correct this deficiency if you can objectively read.
I actually love women more than you do, because I don't lie to them about the reality of nature. You leftists lie to them and destroy them. That is a statistical fact. (I make no claims about whether I have ever lied about anything, rather I am speaking to issue of lying to women about statistical equality of men and women, or even equality between any two people as no one is equal)
Japan has an existential crisis. The youth don't procreate. The economy is deflating.
DooMAD went to one of those sites that produces a political philosophy profile and I think this is a useful taxonomy. CoinCube would I guess be on the right, upper quadrant. Eric S Raymond would be closer to me I think.
Thank you. I think that chart is a reasonably accurate representation of my perspective. Thank for putting in the effort to make that.
I don't think it is accurate to say that I wouldn't praise some of the traits of those who are on the same side of either axis as myself, even though they are on the other side of the other axis from values. So while I might condone some of the social liberalism of Gandhi, I would disagree with the economic totalitarianism. Ditto while I admire some of Thatcher's views, I wouldn't agree with totalitarian restriction of social values. Having said that, I do admire some conservative social values, such as I think abortion and birth control are self-destructive on a statistical basis, but I am not going to join some religion which tries to control the freewill of people.
Note however, there is distinction between having these values and needing to interact in a society that for the most part doesn't share these values.
My values free me from needing to control what other people do on a societal level (might be different in my interpersonal relationships). Economic right means I accept the natural law will impact the outcome, so nothing I need to control. Ditto my interpretation of social liberalism is that we all reap what we sow. Abort your children, you'll likely end up in a life lacking meaning.
The view of the world through the eyes of Anonymint:
The only "justifiable" standpoint in your view is at the very "right" of the chart from your (literally) skewed perspective. Everyone and everything else is communist. Your bitter tone implies frustration that the rest of the world doesn't share this perspective. So you lash out at all the "leftists" even though you apparently mean to include people who would be viewed as right by those on the left. The only ones who aren't "leftists" are the hardline libertarians. The average person will never see it, but in your world Hitler and Gandhi are two peas in a pod. Augusto Pinochet and the Dalai Lama are equally authoritarian. They're all communists.
The only "justifiable" standpoint in your view is at the very "right" of the chart from your (literally) skewed perspective. Everyone and everything else is communist. Your bitter tone implies frustration that the rest of the world doesn't share this perspective. So you lash out at all the "leftists" even though you apparently mean to include people who would be viewed as right by those on the left. The only ones who aren't "leftists" are the hardline libertarians. The average person will never see it, but in your world Hitler and Gandhi are two peas in a pod. Augusto Pinochet and the Dalai Lama are equally authoritarian. They're all communists.
Thank you. I think that chart is a reasonably accurate representation of my perspective. Thank for putting in the effort to make that.
I don't think it is accurate to say that I wouldn't praise some of the traits of those who are on the same side of either axis as myself, even though they are on the other side of the other axis from values. So while I might condone some of the social liberalism of Gandhi, I would disagree with the economic totalitarianism. Ditto while I admire some of Thatcher's views, I wouldn't agree with totalitarian restriction of social values. Having said that, I do admire some conservative social values, such as I think abortion and birth control are self-destructive on a statistical basis, but I am not going to join some religion which tries to control the freewill of people.
Note however, there is distinction between having these values and needing to interact in a society that for the most part doesn't share these values.
My values free me from needing to control what other people do on a societal level (might be different in my interpersonal relationships). Economic right means I accept the natural law will impact the outcome, so nothing I need to control. Ditto my interpretation of social liberalism is that we all reap what we sow. Abort your children, you'll likely end up in a life lacking meaning.
The social conservatism and liberalism axis seems to not capture accurate the distinction between those who lie and those are objective. Why is that? The liberals lie to women about equality. The conservatives lie about the diversity of strategies in nature.
