VMC and AMC will be making a join announcement this coming Thursday about
their Research And Development.
their Research And Development.
Trying to build up some hype!!! (stock prices)
Topic: [AMC]-The Official Active Mining Cooperative Discussion - page 107. (Read 223316 times)
Trying to build up some hype!!! (stock prices)
VMC and AMC will be making a join announcement this coming Thursday about
their Research And Development.
their Research And Development.
Anticipation building up...
VMC and AMC will be making a joint announcement this coming Thursday about
their Research And Development.
Timer removed. End time: 2013-06-27+18:00:00
their Research And Development.
Timer removed. End time: 2013-06-27+18:00:00
No votes require comments. The voting mechanism has a facility to make the comment either public or private though. So the public might not see them, but the issuer will get them via email.
Cheers.
Cheers.
Good, but I'm sure you guys can do better.
Remember that from Anonimity to Impunity it's just a small step.
Making the process open and transparent will help to achieve reasonable and fundamented decisions, and will help to make sure the voting is as imparcial as possible.
Voting is to the benefit of btct.co as a whole and should not be able to be exploited by anyone who holds their best personal interests first.
While it would be nice to have AMC listed on btct.co, I won't be surprised if it takes a long time to get approved or even doesn't.
Allowing anonymous moderator votes is as transparent as someone judging you while you wait outside the court. You never know what's coming and what are their true motives.
Every moderator should also be required to comment on their vote.
Allowing anonymous moderator votes is as transparent as someone judging you while you wait outside the court. You never know what's coming and what are their true motives.
Every moderator should also be required to comment on their vote.
No votes require comments. The voting mechanism has a facility to make the comment either public or private though. So the public might not see them, but the issuer will get them via email.
Cheers.
Yes, that is the main point/issue.
Im also considering how it must feel for established and experienced operators, to know that their venture could be decided by an 18 year old, who currently has shown themselves to have questionable judgement.... he is 18, of course his judgement is going to let him down! Despite the fact that he is a smart cookie, who has attempted to right a wrong, and will surely go far, why afford him that much influence?
He owns enough share to have the right to vote, that's it.Im also considering how it must feel for established and experienced operators, to know that their venture could be decided by an 18 year old, who currently has shown themselves to have questionable judgement.... he is 18, of course his judgement is going to let him down! Despite the fact that he is a smart cookie, who has attempted to right a wrong, and will surely go far, why afford him that much influence?
Frankly, he apologized and showed himself genuinely sorry. What he did was wrong, he knows it, he won't do it again, what can he do more ? He made a mistake, everybody does mistakes. Next mistake will be fatal of course, but I'm pretty confident he learned a lesson kind of the hard way.
He cant do any more. Its no longer about him.
Unless Ken has an opinion, best we leave it there.
Yes, that is the main point/issue.
Im also considering how it must feel for established and experienced operators, to know that their venture could be decided by an 18 year old, who currently has shown themselves to have questionable judgement.... he is 18, of course his judgement is going to let him down! Despite the fact that he is a smart cookie, who has attempted to right a wrong, and will surely go far, why afford him that much influence?
He owns enough share to have the right to vote, that's it.Im also considering how it must feel for established and experienced operators, to know that their venture could be decided by an 18 year old, who currently has shown themselves to have questionable judgement.... he is 18, of course his judgement is going to let him down! Despite the fact that he is a smart cookie, who has attempted to right a wrong, and will surely go far, why afford him that much influence?
Frankly, he apologized and showed himself genuinely sorry. What he did was wrong, he knows it, he won't do it again, what can he do more ? He made a mistake, everybody does mistakes. Next mistake will be fatal of course, but I'm pretty confident he learned a lesson kind of the hard way.
Ive just noticed garr255 (Cognitive) had/has a vote. If anyone followed the 'Shillgate' affair, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/garr255werner-auction-shilling-238474 ,its at best highly questionable, at worst, a complete farce.
Everything considered, he did apologize and offered reparation. I just hope he realized that it's never worth it.
Anyway, you do raise an important issue, similar to what I said above. Why would any moderator that is also the issuer of a competing asset would want another competitor in there? Especially since votes can be anonymous, so true motives can be hidden.
Yes, that is the main point/issue.
Im also considering how it must feel for established and experienced operators, to know that their venture could be decided by an 18 year old, who currently has shown themselves to have questionable judgement.... he is 18, of course his judgement is going to let him down! Despite the fact that he is a smart cookie, who has attempted to right a wrong, and will surely go far, why afford him that much influence?
Thats a rhetorical question, as ive kinda adjusted my expectations of the mods, issuers, and operators of late, and dont feel the need to make it an issue anymore.
Sorry if off topic, but needed to be high-lighted.
that´s true... get AMC listed on cryptostocks then...
Ive just noticed garr255 (Cognitive) had/has a vote. If anyone followed the 'Shillgate' affair, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/garr255werner-auction-shilling-238474 ,its at best highly questionable, at worst, a complete farce.
Everything considered, he did apologize and offered reparation. I just hope he realized that it's never worth it.
Anyway, you do raise an important issue, similar to what I said above. Why would any moderator that is also the issuer of a competing asset would want another competitor in there? Especially since votes can be anonymous, so true motives can be hidden.
Yes, that is the main point/issue.
Im also considering how it must feel for established and experienced operators, to know that their venture could be decided by an 18 year old, who currently has shown themselves to have questionable judgement.... he is 18, of course his judgement is going to let him down! Despite the fact that he is a smart cookie, who has attempted to right a wrong, and will surely go far, why afford him that much influence?
Thats a rhetorical question, as ive kinda adjusted my expectations of the mods, issuers, and operators of late, and dont feel the need to make it an issue anymore.
Sorry if off topic, but needed to be high-lighted.
Ive just noticed garr255 (Cognitive) had/has a vote. If anyone followed the 'Shillgate' affair, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/garr255werner-auction-shilling-238474 ,its at best highly questionable, at worst, a complete farce.
Everything considered, he did apologize and offered reparation. I just hope he realized that it's never worth it.
Anyway, you do raise an important issue, similar to what I said above. Why would any moderator that is also the issuer of a competing asset would want another competitor in there? Especially since votes can be anonymous, so true motives can be hidden.
While it would be nice to have AMC listed on btct.co, I won't be surprised if it takes a long time to get approved or even doesn't.
Allowing anonymous moderator votes is as transparent as someone judging you while you wait outside the court. You never know what's coming and what are their true motives.
Every moderator should also be required to comment on their vote.
Allowing anonymous moderator votes is as transparent as someone judging you while you wait outside the court. You never know what's coming and what are their true motives.
Every moderator should also be required to comment on their vote.
Yes, It is just like when Ukto required AMC to do a poll here in the forums.
Ive just noticed garr255 (Cognitive) had/has a vote. If anyone followed the 'Shillgate' affair, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/garr255werner-auction-shilling-238474 ,its at best highly questionable, at worst, a complete farce.
While it would be nice to have AMC listed on btct.co, I won't be surprised if it takes a long time to get approved or even doesn't.
Allowing anonymous moderator votes is as transparent as someone judging you while you wait outside the court. You never know what's coming and what are their true motives.
Every moderator should also be required to comment on their vote.
Allowing anonymous moderator votes is as transparent as someone judging you while you wait outside the court. You never know what's coming and what are their true motives.
Every moderator should also be required to comment on their vote.
Yes, It is just like when Ukto required AMC to do a poll here in the forums.
While it would be nice to have AMC listed on btct.co, I won't be surprised if it takes a long time to get approved or even doesn't.
Allowing anonymous moderator votes is as transparent as someone judging you while you wait outside the court. You never know what's coming and what are their true motives.
Every moderator should also be required to comment on their vote.
Allowing anonymous moderator votes is as transparent as someone judging you while you wait outside the court. You never know what's coming and what are their true motives.
Every moderator should also be required to comment on their vote.
What does one need in order to vote on these kind a things ?
Only owners of 10+ shares of LTC-global can vote. 
What does one need in order to vote on these kind a things ?
Hey Ken, I just seen an AMC-PT listing on BCT-TC. Looking at the details, I noticed that the contact details was for an address in London. Did you list this yourself or has someone else beaten you to the punch?
https://btct.co/security
I don't see it on the securities list. Am i missing something?
It is getting voted on, Please lobby anyone that can vote for our approval.
get news on frontpage of btct.to, I guess it will not take so much effort to be approved... I do not have enough shares to vote unfortunately. Will you get AMC on cryptostocks as well? I like this web due to fast trading, btct.to and bitfunder are usually too slow to launch charts on iphone
Hey Ken, I just seen an AMC-PT listing on BCT-TC. Looking at the details, I noticed that the contact details was for an address in London. Did you list this yourself or has someone else beaten you to the punch?
https://btct.co/security
I don't see it on the securities list. Am i missing something?
It is getting voted on, Please lobby anyone that can vote for our approval.
I found it. So how does this work? It is a PT from the Bitfunder security?
PT ?
Passthrough shares.
Hey Ken, I just seen an AMC-PT listing on BCT-TC. Looking at the details, I noticed that the contact details was for an address in London. Did you list this yourself or has someone else beaten you to the punch?
https://btct.co/security
I don't see it on the securities list. Am i missing something?
It is getting voted on, Please lobby anyone that can vote for our approval.
I found it. So how does this work? It is a PT from the Bitfunder security?
PT ?
If this gets approved on BTCT, what do you plan the IPO price to be?
Will be announced later.
Currently have 2 of the minimum 5 needed approval votes on BTC-TC
Jump to: