Pages:
Author

Topic: AMT users thread. - page 37. (Read 60119 times)

hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
August 01, 2014, 10:02:37 AM
I wonder if AMT customers should start pinging Bitmine for delivery of their miners.

Afterall Bitmine should accept some responsibility considering that they've advertised that AMT was (and still is?) their exclusive distributor in the U.S.A.



I contacted them requesting a refund because AMT was their distributor and the let me know I'd have to go through AMT. Even though I had explained in the e-mail that AMT was non-communicative and that they refuse to process refunds.

But if anyone else wants to give it a go on the front of them delivering miners to us I'd be interested in hearing how that turned out. They were essentially supposed to be churning out the same product just manufactured here.

I think every defrauded AMT customer needs to send an email to Bitmine.

Bitmine should shoulder some responsibility after all they directed U.S.A. customers to AMT.
I said that in late March... And more than 'some' responsibility. CM issues aside AMT was trying to use Bitmine board designs as-given to them by BM.ch. The BOM and pcb layouts were revised at least 4 times during production. Even then BM.ch still had not figured out how badly they blew the top heat sink needs. (ergo the TechnoBit boards) And that is after the delays BM.ch had in getting any remotely workable 8-chip design to begin with.

As for the many other levels of messed up - AMT all the way on those points.

No matter what the product, for something this seriously fucked up the company behind the distributor should be bound to be Liable for said distributors actions and inaction's. Can't say I've looked at the Bitmine thread in ages so don;t know how folks are over ther but if Bitmine has/is taken care of them then they need to spread the love to here across the Pond.

Definitely,  the said AMT was an *EXCLUSIVE* distributor,  that should mean something in terms of responsibility to deliver.

Regarding the Technobit boards..... what ever happened to them?

No we supposedly have boards coming from China.  

Yea from what it appears it seems the technobit designs are being assembled in China. Even Marto confirmed that AMT was licensing the design and they would provide design support (not end user tech support). These are not technobit boards perse just the design is technobit. Manufacturing is done by someone else (Chinese in this case). Least that is how it seems from the various posts on the matter.

Either way technobit designs are solid so if we do get those, that would not be such a bad thing so long as the design itself is not borked during assembly. But the biggest thing really is actually getting them at this point....but yea I agree with NotFuzzy on the whole bitmine thing. They caused some of the delays as well with their design issues that led to a domino effect of delays. That said the communications and delays since though do fall on AMT and they are accountable for that themselves.
legendary
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Cryptotalk.org - Get paid for every post!
August 01, 2014, 05:28:58 AM
I wonder if AMT customers should start pinging Bitmine for delivery of their miners.

Afterall Bitmine should accept some responsibility considering that they've advertised that AMT was (and still is?) their exclusive distributor in the U.S.A.



I contacted them requesting a refund because AMT was their distributor and the let me know I'd have to go through AMT. Even though I had explained in the e-mail that AMT was non-communicative and that they refuse to process refunds.

But if anyone else wants to give it a go on the front of them delivering miners to us I'd be interested in hearing how that turned out. They were essentially supposed to be churning out the same product just manufactured here.

I think every defrauded AMT customer needs to send an email to Bitmine.

Bitmine should shoulder some responsibility after all they directed U.S.A. customers to AMT.
I said that in late March... And more than 'some' responsibility. CM issues aside AMT was trying to use Bitmine board designs as-given to them by BM.ch. The BOM and pcb layouts were revised at least 4 times during production. Even then BM.ch still had not figured out how badly they blew the top heat sink needs. (ergo the TechnoBit boards) And that is after the delays BM.ch had in getting any remotely workable 8-chip design to begin with.

As for the many other levels of messed up - AMT all the way on those points.

No matter what the product, for something this seriously fucked up the company behind the distributor should be bound to be Liable for said distributors actions and inaction's. Can't say I've looked at the Bitmine thread in ages so don;t know how folks are over ther but if Bitmine has/is taken care of them then they need to spread the love to here across the Pond.

Definitely,  the said AMT was an *EXCLUSIVE* distributor,  that should mean something in terms of responsibility to deliver.

Regarding the Technobit boards..... what ever happened to them?

No we supposedly have boards coming from China.   
legendary
Activity: 3822
Merit: 2703
Evil beware: We have waffles!
July 31, 2014, 10:51:48 PM
I wonder if AMT customers should start pinging Bitmine for delivery of their miners.

Afterall Bitmine should accept some responsibility considering that they've advertised that AMT was (and still is?) their exclusive distributor in the U.S.A.



I contacted them requesting a refund because AMT was their distributor and the let me know I'd have to go through AMT. Even though I had explained in the e-mail that AMT was non-communicative and that they refuse to process refunds.

But if anyone else wants to give it a go on the front of them delivering miners to us I'd be interested in hearing how that turned out. They were essentially supposed to be churning out the same product just manufactured here.

I think every defrauded AMT customer needs to send an email to Bitmine.

Bitmine should shoulder some responsibility after all they directed U.S.A. customers to AMT.
I said that in late March... And more than 'some' responsibility. CM issues aside AMT was trying to use Bitmine board designs as-given to them by BM.ch. The BOM and pcb layouts were revised at least 4 times during production. Even then BM.ch still had not figured out how badly they blew the top heat sink needs. (ergo the TechnoBit boards) And that is after the delays BM.ch had in getting any remotely workable 8-chip design to begin with.

As for the many other levels of messed up - AMT all the way on those points.

No matter what the product, for something this seriously fucked up the company behind the distributor should be bound to be Liable for said distributors actions and inaction's. Can't say I've looked at the Bitmine thread in ages so don;t know how folks are over ther but if Bitmine has/is taken care of them then they need to spread the love to here across the Pond.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
July 31, 2014, 08:30:50 PM
the only reason bitmine stays associated with AMT is because they are related to one another (family). im sure bitmine is embarrassed by the fact they have to be associated with AMT.  Joshua Zipkin is a disgrace to the bitcoin community.
legendary
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Cryptotalk.org - Get paid for every post!
July 31, 2014, 08:30:45 PM
I wonder if AMT customers should start pinging Bitmine for delivery of their miners.

Afterall Bitmine should accept some responsibility considering that they've advertised that AMT was (and still is?) their exclusive distributor in the U.S.A.



I contacted them requesting a refund because AMT was their distributor and the let me know I'd have to go through AMT. Even though I had explained in the e-mail that AMT was non-communicative and that they refuse to process refunds.

But if anyone else wants to give it a go on the front of them delivering miners to us I'd be interested in hearing how that turned out. They were essentially supposed to be churning out the same product just manufactured here.

I think every defrauded AMT customer needs to send an email to Bitmine.

Bitmine should shoulder some responsibility after all they directed U.S.A. customers to AMT.
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 500
Just a regular guy who likes his fiber.
July 31, 2014, 05:09:11 PM
It would be nice if they would just send us the miners and then invoice AMT.
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 500
Just a regular guy who likes his fiber.
July 31, 2014, 05:08:37 PM
I wonder if AMT customers should start pinging Bitmine for delivery of their miners.

Afterall Bitmine should accept some responsibility considering that they've advertised that AMT was (and still is?) their exclusive distributor in the U.S.A.



I contacted them requesting a refund because AMT was their distributor and the let me know I'd have to go through AMT. Even though I had explained in the e-mail that AMT was non-communicative and that they refuse to process refunds.

But if anyone else wants to give it a go on the front of them delivering miners to us I'd be interested in hearing how that turned out. They were essentially supposed to be churning out the same product just manufactured here.
legendary
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Cryptotalk.org - Get paid for every post!
July 31, 2014, 02:28:45 PM
I wonder if AMT customers should start pinging Bitmine for delivery of their miners.

Afterall Bitmine should accept some responsibility considering that they've advertised that AMT was (and still is?) their exclusive distributor in the U.S.A.

sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
July 31, 2014, 01:42:52 PM
It looks like Bitmine.ch has in stock their generation 2 coin desk models:

http://bitmine.ch/product/coincraft-desk-gen2/

"Hashing speed in nominal mode of 1000 GH/s (1 TH/s) minimum guaranteed."

in stock and shipping at the price of $1,599.

At these prices,  AMT owes us four of these models for the $6,000 we paid for one.

yes. At least 4 machines is what is currently owed.
legendary
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Cryptotalk.org - Get paid for every post!
July 31, 2014, 01:09:51 PM
It looks like Bitmine.ch has in stock their generation 2 coin desk models:

http://bitmine.ch/product/coincraft-desk-gen2/

"Hashing speed in nominal mode of 1000 GH/s (1 TH/s) minimum guaranteed."

in stock and shipping at the price of $1,599.

At these prices,  AMT owes us four of these models for the $6,000 we paid for one.
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 500
Just a regular guy who likes his fiber.
July 31, 2014, 12:36:00 PM
And to think if those machines actually worked when they arrived, I might have actually broken even.
legendary
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Cryptotalk.org - Get paid for every post!
July 31, 2014, 12:24:19 PM
My order at 961 was delivered badly damaged.  It never worked.

Are you sure you didn't take a crowbar to it? Your machine looked like it got drunk and started running it's mouth. I think it was almost better not to receive it in a case.


Mrpark was shipped with a case and it also looked in terrible shape.

hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 500
Just a regular guy who likes his fiber.
July 31, 2014, 12:17:31 PM
My order at 961 was delivered badly damaged.  It never worked.

Are you sure you didn't take a crowbar to it? Your machine looked like it got drunk and started running it's mouth. I think it was almost better not to receive it in a case.
legendary
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Cryptotalk.org - Get paid for every post!
July 31, 2014, 11:46:51 AM
My order at 961 was delivered badly damaged.  It never worked.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
July 31, 2014, 10:39:32 AM
Since the few machines that were delivered do not work, everyone has been placed back on 'to be delivered'.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
July 30, 2014, 06:39:26 PM
Might as well add me back. I sent my back RMA. Somehow mine was managed to be accepted.

But yea all our orders minus the one received should be back on as not delivered.
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 500
Just a regular guy who likes his fiber.
July 30, 2014, 01:41:53 PM
Might as well add me back. I sent my back RMA. Somehow mine was managed to be accepted.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
July 30, 2014, 01:16:44 PM
Bump: A reminder this is the non-moderated user thread for AMT hardware and the company's thread appears to be heavily moderated.

thanks to YOU
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
July 30, 2014, 01:08:39 PM
Might want to add me, order 958 of a 1.2T miner. I got a broken miner which I shipped back three times and it was returned three times.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
July 30, 2014, 11:21:01 AM
Might want to re-add all the received orders as all of those had to be RMAed due to the bad boards. I know my order is on that received list but broken and its a safe bet all the others minus the one received partial order in the last couple of weeks.

Mine was also received but was not working. I sent a RMA but it was refused my AMT.
Pages:
Jump to: