I will dig out some numbers as well
Topic: ANACS Casascius Grade Population Table (Updated: 18JAN16) - page 3. (Read 2287 times)
I will dig out some numbers as well
So, need one of each type in order to get a full report? (Or simply type in enough random cert numbers to get it?)
What I find interesting are the two MS62 coins, and I'd love to see what those look like exactly. These don't circulate and unless someone actually handles them quite a bit, they shouldn't be below (I would say) MS65.
And though ANACS is certainly a respected grading company, it'd be great if the other two of the big three (NGC, PCGS) would get into this and start grading physical bitcoins.
Thanks for posting.
And though ANACS is certainly a respected grading company, it'd be great if the other two of the big three (NGC, PCGS) would get into this and start grading physical bitcoins.
Thanks for posting.
Want me to post some cert #s?
2011 Brass - 4539807
2012 Brass - 4362007
2013 Brass Single - 4359096
2013 Brass Half - 4932755
5BTC - 4620876
10BTC - 4603809
25BTC - 4909059
Make a nice listing for us!!
2011 Brass - 4539807
2012 Brass - 4362007
2013 Brass Single - 4359096
2013 Brass Half - 4932755
5BTC - 4620876
10BTC - 4603809
25BTC - 4909059
Make a nice listing for us!!
Quote
Thanks for sharing. Are you able to pull the same for 2011 Casascius? Wondering how many ms68 or higher errors exist.., I entered a cert number but got an error.
User error....looks like there are 5 MS68 errors
ANACS cert lookup: http://www.anacs.com/Populations/CertVerification.aspx
DATA UPDATED ON 1/18/16
NOTES:
DATA UPDATED ON 1/18/16
| Type | Date | Mint/Variety | Super | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | Total |
| TOKEN | 2014 | NO TITLE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 18 | 15 | 81(+1) | 40 | 32(+1) | 0 | 190 | |
| TOKEN | 2014 | NO TITLE | DCAM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 17(+2) | 17(+2) | 6(+3) | 0 | 46 |
| TOKEN | 2013 | CASASCIUS 0.1 BITCOIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 7 | 17 | 19 | 35 | 11 | 107 | |
| TOKEN | 2013 | CASASCIUS 0.5 BITCOIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 26 | 47(+1) | 38 | 42(+2) | 18(+2) | 20 | 1 | 195 | |
| TOKEN | 2013 | CASASCIUS 1 BITCOIN | 0 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 34(+1) | 59 | 51 | 59(+1) | 44(+1) | 64(+2) | 12 | 341 | |
| TOKEN | 2013 | CASASCIUS 1 BITCOIN | DCAM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
| TOKEN | 2013 | NO TITLE | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 49 | 94 | 59 | 98(+2) | 65(+35) | 33(+12) | 1(+1) | 412 | |
| TOKEN | 2013 | NO TITLE | DCAM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 15 |
| TOKEN | 2012 | CASASCIUS 1 BITCOIN | 8 | 1 | 8 | 24 | 45 | 21 | 5 | 8(+2) | 1(+1) | 2 | 0 | 153 | |
| TOKEN | 2012 | CASASCIUS 5 BITCOINS | 9(+2) | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 29 | 7 | 8 | 5(+1) | 0 | 0 | 62 | |
| TOKEN | 2012 | CASASCIUS 5 BITCOINS | DETAILS | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| TOKEN | 2012 | NO TITLE (inc 10BTC) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 5(+1) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 16 | |
| TOKEN | 2012 | NO TITLE | DCAM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| TOKEN | 2011 | CASASCIUS 1 BITCOIN | 7 | 0 | 5 | 38 | 39 | 82 | 46 | 17(+1) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 239 | |
| TOKEN | 2011 | CASASCIUS 1 BITCOIN | DETAILS | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| TOKEN | 2011 | NO TITLE (inc 25BTC) | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 16 | 20 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 67 | |
| TOKEN | 2011 | NO TITLE | DETAILS | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
NOTES:
- System likely does NOT account for coins that have been cracked and regraded (thanks ducatitalia).
- 2014: No unique ID for the St Petersburg Bowl coin.
- 2013: Does NOT distinguish between brass, silver, and gilt silver coins (but VERY likely all MS70s are silver).
- 2012: Does NOT distinguish between S1 and S2 bitnickels, or uniquely identify 10BTC coins in any way.
- 2011: Does NOT distinguish between S1 error and S2 coins, or uniquely identify 25BTC coins in any way.
- "NO TITLE" coins in all years could be ANYTHING. I suspect limited to crypto-type "TOKENS".. but mint, denomination, type, etc are all unknown.
Jump to: