Pages:
Author

Topic: (AndySt) The next abuser of stake campaign? - page 3. (Read 1012 times)

hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 556
You can report to the campaign manager or you can also report being marked as spam, if the edited posts don't add anything.
No, what I mean is

The user firstly quoted a post without wrote anything or replied with "Yes" only, in the next day he edited it and express his own opinion about the quoted post.

Example:
Unedited post
A very good decision made by the management of Man United by making Carrick as interim coach. Since Carrick was in control, Man United has continued to show positive results so far. Will it be better after Rangnick takes over, because in terms of quality and experience Rangnick is much better. At least for the time being Man United supporters can be happy with Man United's performance which is getting better after being left by Solskjaer. Ralf Rangnick has finally received a work permit from the British government, so when Man United face Crystal Palace this will be Rangnick's debut as Man United manager. After the excellent results shown by Carrick, will put pressure on Rangnick to be able to continue the positive results obtained by Man United. It's really interesting to see Rangnick's debut, Man United should be able to beat Crystal Palace easily, if we look at Crystal Palace's recent bad performance with two consecutive defeats.
Well, Carrick still remains at the club and will continue to work in the coaching staff of Manchester United already as an assistant to Rangnik. In any case, the decision has already been made and the contract with the Rangnik has already been signed and obtaining a work permit was no longer such an essential detail. Given Manchester United's not the greatest stability in the results, I would personally be wary of claiming an easy victory over Crystal Palace in the upcoming match. Another question is that Manchester United should continue to gain points to improve their standings and where else but in matches with such opponents it is worth doing.

I hope you will understand my point, the thing is all of his post has been edited and no one on gambling discussion noticed that.
legendary
Activity: 2086
Merit: 1759
You can report to the campaign manager or you can also report being marked as spam, if the edited posts don't add anything.

If you have reported it as spam, it is not marked properly, you can quote @AndySt's post here, which you think is a spam post, I will help to report it manually.
maybe other members here can help, if the post is really zero or low value.
The rules explain:
1. No zero or low value, pointless or uninteresting posts or threads. [1][e]

2. No off-topic posts.

3. No trolling.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 556
User : AndySt

This user is interesting about his posting behavior, almost of his posts were edited in the next day, I'm surprised no one noticed this because he have doing this for a year and a half. It's not suspicious if he only edited some words or even add more explanation from his current post, but he's quoting a post without wrote anything or giving a mark "Yes". What's the reason he doing this? it's for abusing the campaign rules of must active for 5 days or want to hide from LoyceV and TryNinja for archiving unedited posts? I think he's high likely want to abuse the campaign rules since most of his posts created per week are around 25-28 and spread for 5 days.

He quoted the post that he think he can comment about it, but since he doesn't have enough time, he quoted the post and edited it tomorrow when he have free time. I think this is behind of his behavior.

RULES
♦️ Must make at least 25 quality posts per week
♦️ You must be an active forum user in daily basis (or at least 5 days a week)
The stake campaign spreadsheet
And for those that (I honestly have no idea why) want to know about the campaign members, here is the list.. but, as I said, no new members are shown in that list until they get their first payment.

Here I will show it based on his latest 10 weeks:
June/13 = He posted on date June 13, 12, 10, 9, 8 (32 posts, spread for 5 days)
June/6 = He posted on date June 6,5, May 31 (25 posts, spread for 3 days)
May/30 = He posted on May 30, 29, 27, 26, 25 (26 posts, spread for 5 days)
May/23 = He posted on May 23, 22, 20, 19, 18 (27 posts, spread for 5 days)
May/16 = He posted on May 16, 15, 13, 12, 11 (29 posts, spread for 5 days)
May/09 = He posted on May 9, 8, 6, 5, 4 (28 posts, spread for 5 days)
May/02 = He posted on May 2, 1, April 30, 29, 28, 27 (28 posts, spread for 6 days)
April/25 = He posted on April 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20 (27 posts,  spread for 6 days)
April/18 = He posted on April 18, 17, 15, 14, 13 (27 posts, spread for 5 days)
April/11 = He posted on April 11, 10, 8, 7, 6 (27 posts, spread for 5 days)

This mean in 10 weeks, only 2 weeks he spread one more day, the rest is hit the minimum requirement while the June/6 he failed to met it (perhaps he already communicate with Caroll)

Here is the example where he quoted a post without add anything

More example with such post can be viewed here:
https://ninjastic.space/post/60232037
https://ninjastic.space/post/60232059
https://ninjastic.space/post/60232095
https://ninjastic.space/post/60232121
https://ninjastic.space/post/60238769

Here is the example where he quoted a post and only mark it with "Yes"

More example with such post can be viewed here:
https://ninjastic.space/post/58613461
https://ninjastic.space/post/58603807
https://ninjastic.space/post/58573425
https://ninjastic.space/post/58573461
https://ninjastic.space/post/58603849

Obviously I will PM Caroll about this thread and look how his response about this.
Pages:
Jump to: