[ANN] 42-coin Development Discussion Thread - page 99.

Lasergun

legendary

Activity: 1155

Merit: 1174

https://t.me/laser9un

Quote from: M8BWNNRFMNdak68c on June 09, 2016, 12:50:57 AM

okay.. but it does not really help.. i used the addnodes from this topic here.. i now only have correct nodes.. i deleted all except wallet.dat.. i downloaded all the blocks again.. i see that the other have correct heights.. but i also get stuck!
might there be a problem with my linux compilation?

~~Try to download blockchain from here: https://tr.im/42blockchain and replace all files in your 42 database directory.~~

It seems that you have compiled your wallet after funkenstein "limited edition" patch has been applied, that is why it stuck at block #990381. Actual code source is here: https://github.com/Laser9un/42.

M8BWNNRFMNdak68c

sr. member

Activity: 373

Merit: 250

Quote from: Lasergun on June 08, 2016, 03:21:21 AM

This is a well known problem with all 42 clients (included the latest v. 8.0.0, compiled by soopy452000). It is appear when your client established connections with clients from alien chains ("subver" : Satoshi:0.6.3, Satoshi:0.8.5, DigitalcoinV3.0:3.0.1, WorldcoinFoundation:0.8.6.2...), you can avoid such problem by blocking their ports (9538, 9556, 9336, 7999, 11081). Will be fixed in client on a new codebase.

okay.. but it does not really help.. i used the addnodes from this topic here.. i now only have correct nodes.. i deleted all except wallet.dat.. i downloaded all the blocks again.. i see that the other have correct heights.. but i also get stuck!
might there be a problem with my linux compilation?

Quote

getinfo
{
   "version" : 70000,
   "protocolversion" : 60001,
   "walletversion" : 60000,
   "balance" : 0.00000000,
   "blocks" : 990381,
   "connections" : 3,
   "proxy" : "",
   "difficulty" : 6.54806459,
   "testnet" : false,
   "keypoololdest" : 1450018601,
   "keypoolsize" : 101,
   "paytxfee" : 0.00000001,
   "mininput" : 0.00000001,
   "errors" : "WARNING: Displayed transactions may not be correct! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade."
}

Quote

getpeerinfo
[
   {
   "addr" : "85.24.169.215:24242",
   "services" : "00000001",
   "lastsend" : 1465451008,
   "lastrecv" : 1465451355,
   "conntime" : 1465397686,
   "version" : 60001,
   "subver" : "/42:0.7.0/",
   "inbound" : false,
   "releasetime" : 0,
   "startingheight" : 1636368,
   "banscore" : 0
   },
   {
   "addr" : "70.163.93.46:24242",
   "services" : "00000001",
   "lastsend" : 1465451379,
   "lastrecv" : 1465451379,
   "conntime" : 1465412503,
   "version" : 60001,
   "subver" : "/42:0.7.0/",
   "inbound" : false,
   "releasetime" : 0,
   "startingheight" : 1636745,
   "banscore" : 0
   },
   {
   "addr" : "46.127.57.167:24242",
   "services" : "00000001",
   "lastsend" : 1465451379,
   "lastrecv" : 1465451378,
   "conntime" : 1465446603,
   "version" : 60001,
   "subver" : "/42:0.7.0/",
   "inbound" : false,
   "releasetime" : 0,
   "startingheight" : 1637549,
   "banscore" : 0
   }
]

grandpix

full member

Activity: 256

Merit: 100

It's like a dream within a dream! Come one, we can go one more tier here. 1 Inceptcoin is worth 1000 - 42coins... This is just madness.

kahir

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

damn i still remember when this coin got out and premine got dumped in cryptsy at 1300 btc for each 42 coins LOOL was so cool back in the days

MickyCOB

full member

Activity: 252

Merit: 100

I remeber 42 Coin from way back, Good to see it up and going again

rajeshgarnaik

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

reserved.

tolikkk

hero member

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

www.pumpmycoin.com

I think, we need to leave only 42 coins to start intense marketing campaign to enhance the status of the coins and to attract potential investors and to coin continued to live

Lasergun

legendary

Activity: 1155

Merit: 1174

https://t.me/laser9un

Quote from: M8BWNNRFMNdak68c on June 07, 2016, 11:55:44 PM

i tried the last version ( https://github.com/fourtytwo42/42 ) several times last year.. i was never able to fetch up the the highest blocks.. the chain always got stuck.. i also heard there were different chains.. hendo wanted to fix that, but actually did nothing.. it also consumes a lot of cpu and reacts very slow.. so what are you going to do against that?

here my actual getinfo, what are your numbers?

Code:

{
"version" : 70000,
"protocolversion" : 60001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 1636180,
"connections" : 5,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 3.72573365,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1452611907,
"keypoolsize" : 100,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00000001,
"errors" : ""
}

This is a well known problem with all 42 clients (included the latest v. 8.0.0, compiled by soopy452000). It is appear when your client established connections with clients from alien chains ("subver" : Satoshi:0.6.3, Satoshi:0.8.5, DigitalcoinV3.0:3.0.1, WorldcoinFoundation:0.8.6.2...), you can avoid such problem by blocking their ports (9538, 9556, 9065, 9336, 9333, 7999, 11081, 28753, 9526, 19904, 9771). Will be fixed in client on a new codebase.

M8BWNNRFMNdak68c

sr. member

Activity: 373

Merit: 250

i tried the last version ( https://github.com/fourtytwo42/42 ) several times last year.. i was never able to fetch up the the highest blocks.. the chain always got stuck.. i also heard there were different chains.. hendo wanted to fix that, but actually did nothing.. it also consumes a lot of cpu and reacts very slow.. so what are you going to do against that?

here my actual getinfo, what are your numbers?

Quote

{
   "version" : 70000,
   "protocolversion" : 60001,
   "walletversion" : 60000,
   "balance" : 0.00000000,
   "blocks" : 990381,
   "connections" : 2,
   "proxy" : "",
   "difficulty" : 6.54806459,
   "testnet" : false,
   "keypoololdest" : 1450018601,
   "keypoolsize" : 101,
   "paytxfee" : 0.00000001,
   "mininput" : 0.00000001,
   "errors" : "WARNING: Displayed transactions may not be correct! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade."
}

here some random output:

Quote

ERROR: FetchInputs() : 97071ce3a3 mempool Tx prev not found b28ca71d1b
ignoring large orphan tx (size: 35427, hash: 97071ce3a3)
ERROR: FetchInputs() : ad6070b410 mempool Tx prev not found 02531a55cf
ignoring large orphan tx (size: 64619, hash: ad6070b410)
ERROR: FetchInputs() : 3ebf809fd8 mempool Tx prev not found d5764cff71
ignoring large orphan tx (size: 41975, hash: 3ebf809fd8)
ERROR: FetchInputs() : d8d88a5666 mempool Tx prev not found cfa29d5e2e
ignoring large orphan tx (size: 40913, hash: d8d88a5666)
ERROR: FetchInputs() : fbb9fc6b30 mempool Tx prev not found 1cc54df938
ignoring large orphan tx (size: 51720, hash: fbb9fc6b30)
connection timeout
trying connection 82.192.198.114:24242 lastseen=0.9hrs
connect() failed after select(): Connection refused
trying connection 88.206.187.1:24242 lastseen=0.9hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 82.29.4.122:24242 lastseen=0.9hrs
received block 8a0db20952f8fc9dfa43
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=537d02746a18232b4929
connection timeout
trying connection 82.29.4.122:24242 lastseen=0.9hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 73.211.90.130:24242 lastseen=0.9hrs

Lasergun

legendary

Activity: 1155

Merit: 1174

https://t.me/laser9un

Thank you for the support, guys!
The first priority now is to choose the emission model, so don't forget to submit your vote.

docker

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: Lasergun on June 07, 2016, 06:32:01 AM

Quote from: docker on June 07, 2016, 06:11:36 AM

So we can use our old 42 coins or everything will be new?

Actually, all depends of the community and desirable changes. I propose redemption (swap), during which old 42-s will be redeemable for new 42-s on a 1:1 basis, old 42-s will be destroyed at the same time.

Thanks for the quick answer mate good luck

funkenstein

legendary

Activity: 1066

Merit: 1050

Khazad ai-menu!

Cool. Wishing y'all good luck!

You might want to check my post on 42coin from last year.

http://frass.woodcoin.org/the-42coin-saga/

There's also this one:

https://github.com/funkshelper/42-limited-edition

All it would take would be for a couple of you to start mining using that one and hey presto - a limited supply coin. Kind of antisocial to recommend forking from a year old point but hey - altcoins are about experimentation aren't they? Cheesy

Not that scrypt coin on its own could tread water today.. move algos? switch to mergemined like doge?

Lasergun

legendary

Activity: 1155

Merit: 1174

https://t.me/laser9un

Quote from: Edkemper on June 07, 2016, 11:19:56 AM

Wasn't 42 coin one of the most expensive coin ever made so far, about 2 to 3 years ago?

You are right, 42 was the most expensive coin ever made, at its peak value in 2014, 42 was traded at the highest rate at 1900.00 btc:

and the current price is 0.0654 btc, I made a screenshot for the future reference:

Edkemper

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

I love to trade

Wasn't 42 coin one of the most expensive coin ever made so far, about 2 to 3 years ago?

Woody20285

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1002

Supporting DMD, ERC & PIO

Hey Lasergun - Thank you for picking this up - look forward to
your leadership.

Lasergun

legendary

Activity: 1155

Merit: 1174

https://t.me/laser9un

Quote from: docker on June 07, 2016, 06:11:36 AM

So we can use our old 42 coins or everything will be new?

Actually, all depends of the community and desirable changes. I propose redemption (swap), during which old 42-s will be redeemable for new 42-s on a 1:1 basis, old 42-s will be destroyed at the same time.

docker

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: Lasergun on June 07, 2016, 06:04:41 AM

Quote from: jwiz168 on June 07, 2016, 05:26:33 AM

Is this a re-issue of the 42 coins way back in 2013?

Yes, it is. The genesis block was created on 7th Jan 2014 01:09:14. But I plan to make a new client on modern codebase and migrate to it due to the large number of issues with the original codebase.

So we can use our old 42 coins or everything will be new?

Lasergun

legendary

Activity: 1155

Merit: 1174

https://t.me/laser9un

Quote from: axxo on June 07, 2016, 05:19:26 AM

I thought hendo420 was trying to revive this coin late last year, what happened then?

I contacted him two weeks ago regarding this matter, his answer was: "I tried to revive the coin but was trolled pretty bad so decided not to do a revival."

Quote from: jwiz168 on June 07, 2016, 05:26:33 AM

Is this a re-issue of the 42 coins way back in 2013?

Yes, it is. The genesis block was created on 7th Jan 2014 01:09:14. But I plan to make a new client on modern codebase and migrate to it due to the large number of issues with the original codebase.

jwiz168

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Is this a re-issue of the 42 coins way back in 2013?

Lasergun

legendary

Activity: 1155

Merit: 1174

https://t.me/laser9un

Last Updated: 24-Apr-2021

OLD CHAIN!

Specifications
(v0.7.5.0-gbff08fa-beta)

Launch Date: January 7, 2014
Mining Method: PoW
Algo Type: Scrypt
Total Supply: Unlimited
Block Time: 42 sec
Transaction Confirmation: 2
Transaction Fee: 0.00000001
Difficulty Retarget: 420 sec
Block Reward: #1 - 0.42, #2-419 - 0.00000010, #>421 - 0.000042,
suberblocks (#420, 4242, 42424, 424242, 4242424) - 0.00042
JSON-RPC Port: 4242
Default Listen Port: 24242

Source: https://github.com/42-coin/42OLD
Wallet Download: https://github.com/42-coin/42OLD/releases
Blockchain Snapshot: https://mega.nz - 1020MB/7z (04.2021#2092288-final)

Old Thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-42-super-rare-only-42-coins-to-be-mined-394212 [preANN]
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-42-time-to-revive-42-coin-everyone-get-in-here-399658 [ANN]

SWAP IS FINISHED!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17027381

42OLD: 63.65106601 - burned, 10.33189588 stuck on Cryptopia (9.97228062 + 0.35961526), 6.71561506 sold out, TTL:-80.69857695
42NEW: 1.65231223 - spent, -0.0016107 - left

Topic: [ANN] 42-coin Development Discussion Thread - page 99. (Read 105475 times)