Author

Topic: [ANN] [ASIC-RESISTANT] UltraCoin (UTC) - Ultrafast 6 second transactions!! - page 265. (Read 946650 times)

hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 501
FIRST WALLET UPDATE TONIGHT
jr. member
Activity: 63
Merit: 0
Guys, please help to compile working Ultracoin-qt client for Debian Linux. One which posted in start topic just doesn't work.
Code:
./Ultracoin-qt
error while loading shared libraries: libminiupnpc.so.9: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I checked all linked libraries with
Code:
ldd ./Ultracoin-qt|grep found
libminiupnpc.so.9 =>not found
libboost_filesystem.so.1.49.0 => not found
libboost_program_options.so.1.49.0 => not found
libboost_thread.so.1.49.0 => not found


and then created symlinks which are not found, for example
Code:
ln -s /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_thread.so.1.53.0 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_thread.so.1.49.0
but then got
Code:
$ ./Ultracoin-qt
./Ultracoin-qt: Symbol `_ZTVN5boost6detail16thread_data_baseE' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
./Ultracoin-qt: symbol lookup error: ./Ultracoin-qt: undefined symbol: _ZN5boost11filesystem34path21wchar_t_codecvt_facetEv

UPD.
Done. Successfully compiled Ultracoin wallet from source. Consider adding these steps to start post.

1. apt-get install qt4-qmake libqt4-dev build-essential libboost-dev libboost-system-dev \
    libboost-filesystem-dev libboost-program-options-dev libboost-thread-dev \
    libssl-dev libdb++-dev libminiupnpc-dev

2. git clone https://github.com/dx11/ultracoin

3. cd ultracoin

4. qmake "USE_UPNP=1" && make  (compiling should take around 5 - 10 mins, depending from CPU speed)

5. ./Ultracoin-qt
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
PaulR1: that is an amazing offer!  Cheesy

dcgirl and xwebnetwork offerd 0.5 btc per person, but i just cant make them do that, as they are already doing so much....

Yes you are right, 0,5 BTC is maybe to much asking for hard working community members like dcgirl and xwebnetwork.

But maybe they are willing to donate 0.1 BTC    Grin


@ Bumface AKA Micheal.....


I am proud of you...  Wink Grin

Finally you get the whole picture about marketing "our coin" ...and next to this as a fellow Dutchman, as a serious big UTC Miner since day one, as  UTC Bag Holder (still did didn't sell one of my +220K of UTC coins) and as a UTC Believer I feel good what the UTC community pull's together. Again and again...

Keep up the good work as our UTC Captain.
Our "Captain America" Tongue

If I can be of any sort of help pm me and maybe I can....



well

we still need some btc to pay these devs  Shocked


Well Micheal..

> We did that as community once: pay together to get on Mintpal

> We did that as community twice: pay together to get on Cryptsy

I started twice that action and many UTC community members followed and donated big.

>> We can start that action of donating again !!!!!

@ Bumface aka Micheal.... please add here the BTC address for donating for the UTC Dev's....
 
Then I will try to start for the third time to get our community to donate...

UTC adress : UV65rd1p2D5TcAihXm4vdSWy89tTLajoEf

http://bitgo.pw:3731/address/UV65rd1p2D5TcAihXm4vdSWy89tTLajoEf


BTC adress : 1H8rUGC3KMv7XnkJddD7XJRJQMDqmex7He

https://blockchain.info/address/1H8rUGC3KMv7XnkJddD7XJRJQMDqmex7He

yes those adresses are correct, the target this time is 2 btc for the payment of the new devs

I am putting 20k utc on top of this per agreement with the new devs

Dear UTC Community Members:  Miners, Bag Holders, Believers and Supporters.

We need our UTC coin to grow more and more.... and get awareness all around

Bumface have good plan's for the very near future.

The Dev team needs at least 2 BTC to make things happen on short term.

I am willing to donate 0,5 BTC myself if at least 10 more UTC community members are willing to donate each at least 0,1 BTC.

If 20 UTC members are willing to donate at least each 0,1 BTC then I will donate myself 1,0 BTC.....

So guy's and girl's ... what we going to do to help our coin more in realizing a uptrend Huh[/i]



Put me down for 0,10 BTC greets Fabietech

COME ON GUY's AND GIRLS.... PLEASE DONATE SMALL OR BIG FOR THE DEV TEAM.... AND FOR THE FUTURE OF OUR COIN



+ 1

I am willing to donate also 0,10 BTC .
So count me in please.

Don't ask what our coin can do for us (yet), but ask what we can do for our coin !

I just donate and send my first 0,5 BTC....

Common fellow community members...maybe your turn now Huh


"..........."

well said, all the wheels are in motion now. The new devs have already started coding yesterday.

But we are still short 1,4 btc guys, Paulgr and I are both putting 10k utc on it for the 20k utc that was part of deal....

So if UTC made you a nice profit in the past please donate some btc to 1H8rUGC3KMv7XnkJddD7XJRJQMDqmex7He




But we are still short 1,4 btc guys,
hero member
Activity: 693
Merit: 500
@plant you get HW errors.

I am a bit sleepy but I think you have 4x290s?

--scrypt-chacha -R 10240 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 3456 --lookup-gap 3 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600

I Have 4 x R9-290 Sapphire

I would agree with this, however, at LG=3 I would switch -R 10240 for -X 32 - everything else looks fine to me.


I have 3x 290x and 1x 290 in my rig with 8 GB of RAM.  I cannot run with LG=3.  I have to run it at LG=4 and a buffer size of 26xx or I get the dreaded "Error 4 - Cannot Enqueue...".

I only get about 58 KH/s out of each card in this setup.  Just an FYI for others with 4x 290 issues. 

I would play around with your setup - make sure you run the setx command for max alloc - I'm not allocating quite that much on my 4 cards (only need a touch over 3000 for mine), but another thing you could try is to set one batch file to launch two cards, re-enter the setx alloc command, and launch a second batch file that runs the other two cards.  I actually figured that out when trying to run 2 4GB and 2 2GB cards on a machine with 4 GB.  It may work for you.  Another thing you can try is to increase your swapfile size... 16 GB or more - couldn't hurt.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Anyone else having problems logging in from ultra.nitro.org?
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
@plant you get HW errors.

I am a bit sleepy but I think you have 4x290s?

--scrypt-chacha -R 10240 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 3456 --lookup-gap 3 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600

I Have 4 x R9-290 Sapphire

I would agree with this, however, at LG=3 I would switch -R 10240 for -X 32 - everything else looks fine to me.


I have 3x 290x and 1x 290 in my rig with 8 GB of RAM.  I cannot run with LG=3.  I have to run it at LG=4 and a buffer size of 26xx or I get the dreaded "Error 4 - Cannot Enqueue...".

I only get about 58 KH/s out of each card in this setup.  Just an FYI for others with 4x 290 issues. 
sr. member
Activity: 320
Merit: 250
PaulR1: that is an amazing offer!  Cheesy

dcgirl and xwebnetwork offerd 0.5 btc per person, but i just cant make them do that, as they are already doing so much....

Yes you are right, 0,5 BTC is maybe to much asking for hard working community members like dcgirl and xwebnetwork.

But maybe they are willing to donate 0.1 BTC    Grin


@ Bumface AKA Micheal.....


I am proud of you...  Wink Grin

Finally you get the whole picture about marketing "our coin" ...and next to this as a fellow Dutchman, as a serious big UTC Miner since day one, as  UTC Bag Holder (still did didn't sell one of my +220K of UTC coins) and as a UTC Believer I feel good what the UTC community pull's together. Again and again...

Keep up the good work as our UTC Captain.
Our "Captain America" Tongue

If I can be of any sort of help pm me and maybe I can....



well

we still need some btc to pay these devs  Shocked


Well Micheal..

> We did that as community once: pay together to get on Mintpal

> We did that as community twice: pay together to get on Cryptsy

I started twice that action and many UTC community members followed and donated big.

>> We can start that action of donating again !!!!!

@ Bumface aka Micheal.... please add here the BTC address for donating for the UTC Dev's....
 
Then I will try to start for the third time to get our community to donate...

UTC adress : UV65rd1p2D5TcAihXm4vdSWy89tTLajoEf

http://bitgo.pw:3731/address/UV65rd1p2D5TcAihXm4vdSWy89tTLajoEf


BTC adress : 1H8rUGC3KMv7XnkJddD7XJRJQMDqmex7He

https://blockchain.info/address/1H8rUGC3KMv7XnkJddD7XJRJQMDqmex7He

yes those adresses are correct, the target this time is 2 btc for the payment of the new devs

I am putting 20k utc on top of this per agreement with the new devs

Dear UTC Community Members:  Miners, Bag Holders, Believers and Supporters.

We need our UTC coin to grow more and more.... and get awareness all around

Bumface have good plan's for the very near future.

The Dev team needs at least 2 BTC to make things happen on short term.

I am willing to donate 0,5 BTC myself if at least 10 more UTC community members are willing to donate each at least 0,1 BTC.

If 20 UTC members are willing to donate at least each 0,1 BTC then I will donate myself 1,0 BTC.....

So guy's and girl's ... what we going to do to help our coin more in realizing a uptrend Huh[/i]



Put me down for 0,10 BTC greets Fabietech

COME ON GUY's AND GIRLS.... PLEASE DONATE SMALL OR BIG FOR THE DEV TEAM.... AND FOR THE FUTURE OF OUR COIN



+ 1

I am willing to donate also 0,10 BTC .
So count me in please.

Don't ask what our coin can do for us (yet), but ask what we can do for our coin !

I just donate and send my first 0,5 BTC....

Common fellow community members...maybe your turn now Huh


"..........."

well said, all the wheels are in motion now. The new devs have already started coding yesterday.

But we are still short 1,4 btc guys, Paulgr and I are both putting 10k utc on it for the 20k utc that was part of deal....

So if UTC made you a nice profit in the past please donate some btc to 1H8rUGC3KMv7XnkJddD7XJRJQMDqmex7He


sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
UTC adress : UV65rd1p2D5TcAihXm4vdSWy89tTLajoEf

http://bitgo.pw:3731/address/UV65rd1p2D5TcAihXm4vdSWy89tTLajoEf


BTC adress : 1H8rUGC3KMv7XnkJddD7XJRJQMDqmex7He

https://blockchain.info/address/1H8rUGC3KMv7XnkJddD7XJRJQMDqmex7He

yes those adresses are correct, the target this time is 2 btc for the payment of the new devs

I am putting 20k utc on top of this per agreement with the new devs
hero member
Activity: 661
Merit: 500
Hi all,
i have tryed Cgminer jane patch, cgminer-3.7.2-kalroth, YacMiner.
I can compile all this sw and i can start it but i always have Zero Accepted.

I have tryed difefrent pool.

Example:
{
"pools" : [
    {
            "url" : "stratum+tcp://ultra.nitro.org:3337",
            "user" : "virtual.1",
            "pass" : "x"
    }
],

"scrypt-chacha" : true,
"nfmin" : "4",
"nfmax" : "30",
"starttime" : "1388361600",
"worksize" : "64",
"shaders" : "2560",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"buffer-size" : "3624",
"rawintensity" : "10240",
"gpu-engine" : "300-940",
"gpu-fan" : "40-85",
"temp-cutoff" : "80",
"temp-overheat" : "75",
"temp-target" : "73",
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"api-listen" : true,
"expiry" : "10",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "3",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"

}

----------------------------------------

yacminer version 3.5.0-yac2 - Started: [2014-04-08 16:51:22]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):128.2K (avg):124.5Kh/s | A:0  R:0  HW:14  U:0.00/m  WU:108.41/m  FB:0
 ST: 1  SS: 0  NB: 2  LW: 49  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to ultra.nitro.org diff 64 NF 12 with stratum as user virtual.1
 Block: 2a099e83ed3df437...  Diff:64K  Started: [16:51:32]  Best share: 16
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [G]PU management ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  70.0C  85%    | 31.78K/34.20Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:4 U:0.00/m T:1 rI:10240
 GPU 1:  75.0C  85%    | 31.76K/34.20Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:6 U:0.00/m T:1 rI:10240
 GPU 2:  81.0C  85%    | 31.77K/34.20Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:2 U:0.00/m T:1 rI:10240
 GPU 3:  71.0C  85%    | 31.77K/33.64Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:3 U:0.00/m T:1 rI:10240
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 [2014-04-08 16:51:21] Started yacminer 3.5.0-yac2
 [2014-04-08 16:51:21] Loaded configuration file yacminer.conf
 [2014-04-08 16:51:21] Probing for an alive pool
 [2014-04-08 16:51:22] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 64
 [2014-04-08 16:51:22] GPU 0: bufsize for thread @ 3624MB based on buffer-size
 [2014-04-08 16:51:22] GPU 1: bufsize for thread @ 3624MB based on buffer-size
 [2014-04-08 16:51:22] GPU 2: bufsize for thread @ 3624MB based on buffer-size
 [2014-04-08 16:51:22] GPU 3: bufsize for thread @ 3624MB based on buffer-size
 [2014-04-08 16:51:22] Network diff set to 63K
 [2014-04-08 16:51:28] API running in local read access mode on port 4028 (19)
 [2014-04-08 16:51:32] Network diff set to 64K
 [2014-04-08 16:51:32] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
----------------------------------------

Many tahnks


Hi,

I have the same problem here my miner is working but nothing is accepted and on the pool dashboard nothing is showing !

I have 4 MSI 280x and i'm on xubuntu with catalyst 14.2 beta

That's the first coin that i cant mine after many test, i dont know why.



newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
What is the official word on resolution to this orphan problem?  I know stuhleman said something about a resolution within a week, but this is ridiculous.  Even nitro2 is at 28% orphans the last 24 hours.  Greekpool is at 26%.

You are effectively giving 75% of the miners a susbsidy right now and telling every new miner to go fuck himself as bonuses are for the old guard.  

The fix for this problem lays with the introduction of Level DB and other fixes into the client. I been working with Bumface behind the scenes to get the client fixed. When the update on the client comes we are removing any advantage that Nitro has over other pools, this advantage only exists because we could not sustain any growth with the coma bug. I am sure by now some of you have experienced a 10 to 15 minutes client slow slow start because of the bug, but I want you to consider that multiplied by 1000. When the fix is ready we will take severe measures to disallow the skewed hashrate at Nitro. I will be happy to have 30% of the total hash. I was hoping this will be done within a week time, but according to what Michael posted it might take three weeks. But now that things are in the open and there is a working strategy, we just need a little patience. I promise that as soon as this is fixed and all pools are updated and able to handle the traffic without any problems, I will start immediate action to resize Nitro even if it angers the miners, as this will be their responsibility for the community as well.

well said, all the wheels are in motion now. The new devs have already started coding yesterday.

But we are still short 1,4 btc guys, Paulgr and I are both putting 10k utc on it for the 20k utc that was part of deal....

So if UTC made you a nice profit in the past please donate some btc to 1H8rUGC3KMv7XnkJddD7XJRJQMDqmex7He
UTC needs more BTC!
hero member
Activity: 693
Merit: 500
@plant you get HW errors.

I am a bit sleepy but I think you have 4x290s?

--scrypt-chacha -R 10240 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 3456 --lookup-gap 3 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600

I Have 4 x R9-290 Sapphire

I would agree with this, however, at LG=3 I would switch -R 10240 for -X 32 - everything else looks fine to me.
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
@plant you get HW errors.

I am a bit sleepy but I think you have 4x290s?

--scrypt-chacha -R 10240 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 3456 --lookup-gap 3 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600

My Start scrypt:
------------------------------------------
 cat Start.sh
export DISPLAY=:0
export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1
export GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE=100

./yacminer --config yacminer.conf
------------------------------------------

Debian Jessy
amd-catalyst-14.2-betav1.3-linux-x86.x86_64
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
@plant you get HW errors.

I am a bit sleepy but I think you have 4x290s?

--scrypt-chacha -R 10240 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 3456 --lookup-gap 3 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600

I Have 4 x R9-290 Sapphire
legendary
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
@plant you get HW errors.

I am a bit sleepy but I think you have 4x290s?

--scrypt-chacha -R 10240 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 3456 --lookup-gap 3 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Hi all,
i have tryed Cgminer jane patch, cgminer-3.7.2-kalroth, YacMiner.
I can compile all this sw and i can start it but i always have Zero Accepted.

I have tryed difefrent pool.

Example:
{
"pools" : [
    {
            "url" : "stratum+tcp://ultra.nitro.org:3337",
            "user" : "virtual.1",
            "pass" : "x"
    }
],

"scrypt-chacha" : true,
"nfmin" : "4",
"nfmax" : "30",
"starttime" : "1388361600",
"worksize" : "64",
"shaders" : "2560",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"buffer-size" : "3624",
"rawintensity" : "10240",
"gpu-engine" : "300-940",
"gpu-fan" : "40-85",
"temp-cutoff" : "80",
"temp-overheat" : "75",
"temp-target" : "73",
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"api-listen" : true,
"expiry" : "10",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "3",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"

}

----------------------------------------

yacminer version 3.5.0-yac2 - Started: [2014-04-08 16:51:22]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):128.2K (avg):124.5Kh/s | A:0  R:0  HW:14  U:0.00/m  WU:108.41/m  FB:0
 ST: 1  SS: 0  NB: 2  LW: 49  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to ultra.nitro.org diff 64 NF 12 with stratum as user virtual.1
 Block: 2a099e83ed3df437...  Diff:64K  Started: [16:51:32]  Best share: 16
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [G]PU management ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  70.0C  85%    | 31.78K/34.20Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:4 U:0.00/m T:1 rI:10240
 GPU 1:  75.0C  85%    | 31.76K/34.20Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:6 U:0.00/m T:1 rI:10240
 GPU 2:  81.0C  85%    | 31.77K/34.20Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:2 U:0.00/m T:1 rI:10240
 GPU 3:  71.0C  85%    | 31.77K/33.64Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:3 U:0.00/m T:1 rI:10240
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 [2014-04-08 16:51:21] Started yacminer 3.5.0-yac2
 [2014-04-08 16:51:21] Loaded configuration file yacminer.conf
 [2014-04-08 16:51:21] Probing for an alive pool
 [2014-04-08 16:51:22] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 64
 [2014-04-08 16:51:22] GPU 0: bufsize for thread @ 3624MB based on buffer-size
 [2014-04-08 16:51:22] GPU 1: bufsize for thread @ 3624MB based on buffer-size
 [2014-04-08 16:51:22] GPU 2: bufsize for thread @ 3624MB based on buffer-size
 [2014-04-08 16:51:22] GPU 3: bufsize for thread @ 3624MB based on buffer-size
 [2014-04-08 16:51:22] Network diff set to 63K
 [2014-04-08 16:51:28] API running in local read access mode on port 4028 (19)
 [2014-04-08 16:51:32] Network diff set to 64K
 [2014-04-08 16:51:32] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
----------------------------------------

Many tahnks
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
What is the official word on resolution to this orphan problem?  I know stuhleman said something about a resolution within a week, but this is ridiculous.  Even nitro2 is at 28% orphans the last 24 hours.  Greekpool is at 26%.

You are effectively giving 75% of the miners a susbsidy right now and telling every new miner to go fuck himself as bonuses are for the old guard.  

The fix for this problem lays with the introduction of Level DB and other fixes into the client. I been working with Bumface behind the scenes to get the client fixed. When the update on the client comes we are removing any advantage that Nitro has over other pools, this advantage only exists because we could not sustain any growth with the coma bug. I am sure by now some of you have experienced a 10 to 15 minutes client slow slow start because of the bug, but I want you to consider that multiplied by 1000. When the fix is ready we will take severe measures to disallow the skewed hashrate at Nitro. I will be happy to have 30% of the total hash. I was hoping this will be done within a week time, but according to what Michael posted it might take three weeks. But now that things are in the open and there is a working strategy, we just need a little patience. I promise that as soon as this is fixed and all pools are updated and able to handle the traffic without any problems, I will start immediate action to resize Nitro even if it angers the miners, as this will be their responsibility for the community as well.

well said, all the wheels are in motion now. The new devs have already started coding yesterday.

But we are still short 1,4 btc guys, Paulgr and I are both putting 10k utc on it for the 20k utc that was part of deal....

So if UTC made you a nice profit in the past please donate some btc to 1H8rUGC3KMv7XnkJddD7XJRJQMDqmex7He
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
What is the official word on resolution to this orphan problem?  I know stuhleman said something about a resolution within a week, but this is ridiculous.  Even nitro2 is at 28% orphans the last 24 hours.  Greekpool is at 26%.

You are effectively giving 75% of the miners a susbsidy right now and telling every new miner to go fuck himself as bonuses are for the old guard. 

utc.pool.pm has much lower orphan rate AFAIK.
0% in the last 24 hours and only 6% over last 7 days.
https://utc.pool.pm/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks

But yeah, something drastic needs to be done.
Hopefully we'll see something by next week.

Wow almost 7.5 hours and still no blocks found! Something is wrong @pool.mn
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011
jakiman is back!
Can anyone at least reply to my request of the second block explorer, please?

I would love to have one that doesn't require a weird port # also as my work blocks it.
We could definitely do with at least 1 more block explorer as bitgo.pw goes down often.
legendary
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
Can anyone at least reply to my request of the second block explorer, please?
Jump to: