congratulations Bumface !!
No1 wants to see your trash talk its pointless
alltho what you have just said is great stuff carry on
Topic: [ANN] [ASIC-RESISTANT] UltraCoin (UTC) - Ultrafast 6 second transactions!! - page 277. (Read 946650 times)
April 06, 2014, 07:38:05 AM
congratulations Bumface !!
No1 wants to see your trash talk its pointless
alltho what you have just said is great stuff carry on
April 06, 2014, 07:36:01 AM
the developer has deleted my message 3 times
THE TRUTH THAT ANGRY lol
UTC is the best unfair coin ever !!!
the parameters on the retarget nfactor are not communicated and a pool have more than 51% of hasrate network
congratulations dev !!
THE TRUTH THAT ANGRY lol
UTC is the best unfair coin ever !!!
the parameters on the retarget nfactor are not communicated and a pool have more than 51% of hasrate network
congratulations dev !!
Other coins such as Heavycoin has a pool with over 51% hash rate also...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6095032
The reason for Ultracoin and the like have such issues is for one due to lack of multipools.
Other Scrypt coins are mined by tons of auto profit switching pools. So it can't have this problem.
But Ultracoin cannot be mined like that as N factor schedule varies between different coins.
In the meantime, I have requested some unique pool operators such as 1GH to consider opening a pool for Ultracoin.
I love sites like hashing.at and xhash.net
April 06, 2014, 07:34:37 AM
1) my 3 x 290 miner has a WU of 153 kh/s
2) my 4 x 280X miner has a WU of 154 kh/s
which make me think i should be able to tweak miner 2 a bit more
2) my 4 x 280X miner has a WU of 154 kh/s
which make me think i should be able to tweak miner 2 a bit more
April 06, 2014, 07:32:33 AM
Does it still work with the modded CG Miner? I kept lowering my TC settings but still only getting hardware error
It will work simply by lowering the Intensity by 1.
But it won't get you the most optimal hash rate.
April 06, 2014, 07:31:50 AM
the developer has deleted my message 3 times
THE TRUTH THAT ANGRY lol
UTC is the best unfair coin ever !!!
the parameters on the retarget nfactor are not communicated and a pool have more than 51% of hasrate network
congratulations dev !!
THE TRUTH THAT ANGRY lol
UTC is the best unfair coin ever !!!
the parameters on the retarget nfactor are not communicated and a pool have more than 51% of hasrate network
congratulations dev !!
Other coins such as Heavycoin has a pool with over 51% hash rate also...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6095032
The reason for Ultracoin and the like have such issues is for one due to lack of multipools.
Other Scrypt coins are mined by tons of auto profit switching pools. So it can't have this problem.
But Ultracoin cannot be mined like that as N factor schedule varies between different coins.
In the meantime, I have requested some unique pool operators such as http://max.1gh.com/ to consider opening a pool for Ultracoin.
April 06, 2014, 07:30:49 AM
Does it still work with the modded CG Miner? I kept lowering my TC settings but still only getting hardware error
April 06, 2014, 07:29:19 AM
guys we are aware of the hashrate distribution,and we are working on solutions.
but at the end of the day its the miners that choose were to mine, this is not nitro`s fault....
this is a self perpetuating situation, nobody leaves nitro becasue they dont want orphans at other pools, but if enough people left, those other pools wont even have any orphans..
I can not force people to switch, i paid 5000 UTC to move people......
If miners refuse to leave my hands are tied
but at the end of the day its the miners that choose were to mine, this is not nitro`s fault....
this is a self perpetuating situation, nobody leaves nitro becasue they dont want orphans at other pools, but if enough people left, those other pools wont even have any orphans..
I can not force people to switch, i paid 5000 UTC to move people......
If miners refuse to leave my hands are tied
+1 miners move ya ass spread the hash
April 06, 2014, 07:28:58 AM
What have I missed? Why has the hashrate halved on UTC? Sorry if it's been discussed I don't want to read 592 pages.
April 06, 2014, 07:28:14 AM
guys we are aware of the hashrate distribution,and we are working on solutions.
but at the end of the day its the miners that choose were to mine, this is not nitro`s fault....
this is a self perpetuating situation, nobody leaves nitro becasue they dont want orphans at other pools, but if enough people left, those other pools wont even have any orphans..
I can not force people to switch, i paid 5000 UTC to move people......
If miners refuse to leave my hands are tied
but at the end of the day its the miners that choose were to mine, this is not nitro`s fault....
this is a self perpetuating situation, nobody leaves nitro becasue they dont want orphans at other pools, but if enough people left, those other pools wont even have any orphans..
I can not force people to switch, i paid 5000 UTC to move people......
If miners refuse to leave my hands are tied
set the fee's to 3% on nitro1 and 1% on nitro2, at least you balance between your two pools
April 06, 2014, 07:27:01 AM
guys we are aware of the hashrate distribution,and we are working on solutions.
but at the end of the day its the miners that choose were to mine, this is not nitro`s fault....
this is a self perpetuating situation, nobody leaves nitro becasue they dont want orphans at other pools, but if enough people left, those other pools wont even have any orphans..
I can not force people to switch, i paid 5000 UTC to move people......
If miners refuse to leave my hands are tied
but at the end of the day its the miners that choose were to mine, this is not nitro`s fault....
this is a self perpetuating situation, nobody leaves nitro becasue they dont want orphans at other pools, but if enough people left, those other pools wont even have any orphans..
I can not force people to switch, i paid 5000 UTC to move people......
If miners refuse to leave my hands are tied
April 06, 2014, 07:23:43 AM
Is there a site that shows the hash balance? Just like that graph i just quoted.
April 06, 2014, 07:12:19 AM
As it stands if Ultra Nitro doesn't slash the hash rate, it IS INDEED AN ATTACK ON THE NETWORK.
As you are stealing completed work from other pools and thus in - effect canceling out legitimate UTC TRANSACTIONS IN FAVOR OF YOUR OWN (pretty much the very definition of a 51% attack).
"you solved that block 20 minutes ago? well F@#* YOU i just solved mine, yours doesn't count" that's what nitro essentially is doing atm.
The way the network is structured atm , there is no point in even having any other pools, and all the pools will die.
Some people are fine with that, but honestly thats not healthy for the coin, the entire idea is decentralization for the purpose of security and preventing forks.
You are attacking legitimate miners and pools causing them to slip bellow profitability thresholds required to maintain the pool, thus far other pools have been generous slashing rates, lowering %'s and doing promo periods, but they can't keep it up forever they have costs.
What kind of coin only has "one pool"?
FIX YOUR SHIT.
And if words are too hard to comprehend here is a picture.
At the very least make a "nitro 2" or something and have different work assigned to it, and use a server to balance the hash rate to different stratums to decrease orphans and possibility of forks.
Simply moving 25% of nitros hash to a "nitro2" network would improve the situation.
As you are stealing completed work from other pools and thus in - effect canceling out legitimate UTC TRANSACTIONS IN FAVOR OF YOUR OWN (pretty much the very definition of a 51% attack).
"you solved that block 20 minutes ago? well F@#* YOU i just solved mine, yours doesn't count" that's what nitro essentially is doing atm.
The way the network is structured atm , there is no point in even having any other pools, and all the pools will die.
Some people are fine with that, but honestly thats not healthy for the coin, the entire idea is decentralization for the purpose of security and preventing forks.
You are attacking legitimate miners and pools causing them to slip bellow profitability thresholds required to maintain the pool, thus far other pools have been generous slashing rates, lowering %'s and doing promo periods, but they can't keep it up forever they have costs.
What kind of coin only has "one pool"?
FIX YOUR SHIT.
And if words are too hard to comprehend here is a picture.
At the very least make a "nitro 2" or something and have different work assigned to it, and use a server to balance the hash rate to different stratums to decrease orphans and possibility of forks.
Simply moving 25% of nitros hash to a "nitro2" network would improve the situation.
There is a nitro2 i noticed, but i just switched to utc.greekpool.eu with my 2 miners doing around 450 Kh/s
Lets hope Orphan's are going to be less!
April 06, 2014, 07:05:30 AM
it is some good people here? i want some cfg for my 4x 290 for UTC, never have used Scrypt-Jane, can somebody write for me cfg? before i have mined vertcoin and go 1750 with my 4x290 and maybe somebody can offer best pool to mine those UTC? Thnks people 
and maybe somebody can offer best pool to mine those UTC? Thnks people April 06, 2014, 07:00:34 AM
Hilarious orphanfest.
April 06, 2014, 06:58:39 AM
Any yac or cg miner settings for a 270X?
April 06, 2014, 06:33:42 AM
Does it really need to be 8GB RAM? anyone here tried 4GB RAM on YacMiner?
4GB works with YACMiner also.
But I had to use lower buffer and rawintensity or it would disable my GPUs.
My last successful 4GB setting was -R 6144 and -buffer-size 1760.
Getting HW in this settings... "-R 6144 and -buffer-size 1760" and the max hashrate is only 47.
First, try to increase the buffer size a little until you hit the limit where it fails. (In increments of 64)
If it fails to go up, then try either lowering the buffer size a little or try lowering the -R a little. (Increments of 64 for each will do for both)
Basically, more R will fit into a larger buffer. Goal is to fit as much R into the buffer size without it going over. (end up with HW or fails)
April 06, 2014, 06:19:10 AM
Albert, try these and see what you get for hashrate and if any HW errors, all these 7950 are different. I see you have Elpida memory. I have six of those and they work better than the ones with Hynex, although I think it is the vrm that is less quality. After each setting open up GPU-Z and check the sensors tab to see how much memory you are using on the card, more is better and usually gives a better WU. I have learned that using HWInfo is better and more accurate than GPU-Z for win8.1
1) -g 2 --thread-concurrency 19712 --lookup-gap 2 -I 12
2) -g 2 --thread-concurrency 23296 --lookup-gap 3 -I 12
3) -g 2 --thread-concurrency 16128 --lookup-gap 2 -I 12
NOTE: The n-factor is about to change so these settings might not work, you have about an hour! so maybe just wait.
1) -g 2 --thread-concurrency 19712 --lookup-gap 2 -I 12
2) -g 2 --thread-concurrency 23296 --lookup-gap 3 -I 12
3) -g 2 --thread-concurrency 16128 --lookup-gap 2 -I 12
NOTE: The n-factor is about to change so these settings might not work, you have about an hour! so maybe just wait.
I tried and the best is the number 2, I am getting 18kh/s
April 06, 2014, 06:18:30 AM
Does it really need to be 8GB RAM? anyone here tried 4GB RAM on YacMiner?
4GB works with YACMiner also.
But I had to use lower buffer and rawintensity or it would disable my GPUs.
My last successful 4GB setting was -R 6144 and -buffer-size 1760.
Getting HW in this settings... "-R 6144 and -buffer-size 1760" and the max hashrate is only 47.
April 06, 2014, 06:13:00 AM
Hey some 290 settings, this will give 62khash at 977core :
--scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 -I 16 -g 1 -w 64 --thread-concurrency 85000 --lookup-gap 3
This is better than going 90000 TC with lookup-gap 4. Itensity of 17 and higher slows the system by a huge amount(at least for me). There may be room for improvement but I have already achieved 280x/290 ratio of 0.81. I have 8gb of ram + 16gb of pagefile(set as a constant).
If helped
: UmC3d5BemAaKDhEwpiGo2EQuyYMvWDpS1r
--scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 -I 16 -g 1 -w 64 --thread-concurrency 85000 --lookup-gap 3
This is better than going 90000 TC with lookup-gap 4. Itensity of 17 and higher slows the system by a huge amount(at least for me). There may be room for improvement but I have already achieved 280x/290 ratio of 0.81. I have 8gb of ram + 16gb of pagefile(set as a constant).
If helped
: UmC3d5BemAaKDhEwpiGo2EQuyYMvWDpS1rGetting 66khs with 0 HW on 1040/1400 with 3 times r290
April 06, 2014, 06:08:27 AM
Does it really need to be 8GB RAM? anyone here tried 4GB RAM on YacMiner?
4GB works with YACMiner also.
But I had to use lower buffer and rawintensity or it would disable my GPUs.
My last successful 4GB setting was -R 6144 and -buffer-size 1760.
Jump to: