Is the project targeting a well established market or attempting to create a new market? this is not a question of ‘better’ or ‘worse’ it’s a question of risk. targeting a well established market is lower risk, attempting to create a new market is higher risk. There are many similar projects in this sphere (gaming ecosystem)...
To the already existing. Game developers and app markets can easily enter the crypto-economy with BGX. By using the internal token, they can monetize their games and access a large market, while paying only 10% commissions on their revenue. The commission structure is one third of what Play Market and App Store often charge. In exchange, the developers and marketers can access a variety of game-related revenue channels that these larger platforms lack and can use many financial capabilities formerly only possible in the crypto-economyThe BGX platform has several key advantages.
(1) It uses advanced self-learning artificial intelligence fuzzy network that eliminates fraud.
(2) The off-chain hybrid approach to processing transactions enables the BGX platform to process more than 4,000 transactions per second, at a speed and capacity far superior to the Ethereum blockchain.
(3) The double-token system separates the interests of the investors and the users, so that the investors can benefit from significant rise in token price, while the economy remains stable through a stable coin.
(4) The revenue sharing club enables BGX token holders to share in the revenue of the platform, while the tiered system incentivizes holding of the token, raising its price.
(5) BGX is an open-sourced, truly decentralized project. At the same time, it is a technology — not a protocol.
